Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 23:04 UTC

netresearch / ldap-selfservice-password-changer

A simple and fast self-service LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) / AD (Active Directory) password changer written in Golang.

Go · TypeScriptMIT★ 33 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

netresearch/ldap-selfservice-password-changer holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (56/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Netresearch DTT GmbHOrganization · verified domain
43 followers287 public repossince Nov 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/netresearch/ldap-selfservice-password-changerv1.6.2-2420 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume910 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year910
human_commit_share0.6
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year50

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases24 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 20 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~22.5 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 7 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv1.6.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases22.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
24.4/60Stars33 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars33
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 74% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.744
How it's scored
33/42Issue resolution79% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance625/665 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs625
open_issues3
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.786
closed_unmerged_prs40
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
11.8/25Owner reach43 followers of netresearch
25/25Track record287 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers43
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginnetresearch
public_repos287
account_age_days6,153

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 20 days ago
20/20Version history24 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/netresearch/ldap-selfservice-password-changer
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish20

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgolang, ldap, activedirectory, account-management, password, active-directory, go, gopher, password-change, password-reset, self-service, netresearch, application
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

85Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

81Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 7 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0.8/7.5Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate8.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages1
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages12
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 24 resolved dependencies against OSV. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

91Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, internal/AGENTS.md, internal/CLAUDE.md, internal/GEMINI.md, internal/web/AGENTS.md, internal/web/CLAUDE.md, internal/web/GEMINI.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://bun.sh/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history60 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://bun.sh/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, internal/AGENTS.md, internal/CLAUDE.md, internal/GEMINI.md, internal/web/AGENTS.md, internal/web/CLAUDE.md, internal/web/GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes18,338
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance29 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.29
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/76 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes33,020
source_files_sampled76
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

33GitHub stars
2contributors
910commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
3open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package '@netresearch/ldap-selfservice-password-changer' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.1 / 10
8.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 23:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 7 signed artifacts.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
1Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/gofiber/fiber/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/netresearch/simple-ldap-gov1.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/valyala/fasthttpv1.74.0go.mod
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 31 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/gofiber/fiber/v3v3.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/netresearch/simple-ldap-gov1.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Gogithub.com/valyala/fasthttpv1.74.0direct
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ntlmsspv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-asn1-ber/asn1-berv1.5.8indirect
Gogithub.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3v3.4.14indirect
Gogithub.com/gofiber/schemav1.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/gofiber/utils/v2v2.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/molecule-man/go-brrrv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/philhofer/fwdv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tinylib/msgpv1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/bytebufferpoolv1.0.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
npm@eslint/js^10.0.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/postcss^4.3.3indirect
npmeslint^10.9.1indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier^10.1.8indirect
npmpostcss^8.5.26indirect
npmpostcss-cli^11.0.1indirect
npmprettier^3.9.6indirect
npmprettier-plugin-go-template^0.0.15indirect
npmprettier-plugin-tailwindcss^0.8.1indirect
npmtailwindcss^4.3.3indirect
npmtypescript~7.0.2indirect
npmtypescript-eslint^8.68.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 24 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 12 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirectunknown30.56.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.