Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-30 23:30 UTC

networknt / json-schema-validator

A fast Java JSON schema validator that supports draft V4, V6, V7, V2019-09 and V2020-12

JavaApache-2.0★ 1,073 stars⑂ 349 forkssince Sep 2016View on GitHub ↗

networknt/json-schema-validator holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (56/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

networkntOrganization
50 followers57 public repossince Sep 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavencom.networknt:json-schema-validator3.0.6-14823 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence24/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18Commit volume49 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year49
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 23 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~22.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag3.0.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release23
mean_days_between_releases22.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49.2/60Stars1,073 stars
21.2/25Forks349 forks
8.7/15Watchers37 watchers
Inputs used
forks349
stars1,073
watchers37
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 51% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.514
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance506/550 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs506
open_issues7
closed_issues677
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.99
closed_unmerged_prs44
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
12.3/25Owner reach50 followers of networknt
24.8/25Track record57 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers50
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnetworknt
public_repos57
account_age_days4,340
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 23 days ago
20/20Version history148 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescom.networknt:json-schema-validator
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish23

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configtox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjson-schema-validator, json-schema, fast, java8, draft, v4, jackson, java, v6, v7, v2019-09, draftv4, draftv6, draftv7, json, yaml, openapi3, v2020-12
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.2/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
16.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind 3.1.4 (moderate 6.5)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages7
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the maven:com.networknt:json-schema-validator@3.0.6 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 7 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.5/40Legible commit history61 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.61
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrappom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configtox.ini
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes2/422 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes112,822
source_files_sampled422
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

1,073GitHub stars
99contributors
49commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
7open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 349 ⇿
0Stars
349Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037534752016-102021-092026-07
Major 2Minor 5Patch 93

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-30 23:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5CI-Tests10 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.ethlo.time:itu${version.itu}pom.xml
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databind${version.jackson}pom.xml
Maventools.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml${version.jackson}pom.xml
Mavenorg.jruby.joni:joni${version.joni}pom.xml
Mavenorg.graalvm.js:js-language${version.graaljs}pom.xml
Mavenorg.graalvm.truffle:truffle-runtime${version.graaljs}pom.xml
Mavenorg.graalvm.sdk:graal-sdk${version.graaljs}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api${version.slf4j}pom.xml
Mavenme.fabriciorby:maven-surefire-junit5-tree-reporter${version.maven-surefire-junit5-tree-reporter}pom.xml
All dependencies 25

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 16 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.ethlo.time:itu1.14.0direct
Mavenme.fabriciorby:maven-surefire-junit5-tree-reporter1.5.1direct
Mavenorg.graalvm.js:js-language25.0.1direct
Mavenorg.graalvm.sdk:graal-sdk25.0.1direct
Mavenorg.graalvm.truffle:truffle-runtime25.0.1direct
Mavenorg.jruby.joni:joni2.2.6direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.17direct
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databind3.1.4direct
Maventools.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml3.1.4direct
Mavench.qos.logback:logback-classic1.5.22indirect
Mavenorg.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin6.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.14.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.7indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-report-plugin3.5.4indirect
Mavenorg.hamcrest:hamcrest3.0indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.14indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine6.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params6.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.moditect:moditect-maven-plugin1.2.2indirect
Mavenorg.openjdk.jmh:jmh-core1.37indirect
Mavenorg.openjdk.jmh:jmh-generator-annprocess1.37indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.7.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing maven:com.networknt:json-schema-validator@3.0.6 pulls in 7 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind3.1.4directmoderate13.2.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.