Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 20:05 UTC

nickderobertis / allowlister-remote

TypeScript · Rust · JavaScriptNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceCommand-line toolNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

nickderobertis/allowlister-remote holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 21 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Nick DeRobertisPersonal account
87 followers158 public repossince May 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-web0.15.384940 days ago
npm@nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin0.15.32032040 days ago
npm@nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin-linux-x640.15.31441840 days ago
npm@nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin-win32-x640.15.31511840 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 21 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 110 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year110
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push21
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 40 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv0.15.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release40
mean_days_between_releases2.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

32At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

46Weak
How it's scored
36.9/80Monthly downloads — 582 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-web, @nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin, @nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin-linux-x64, @nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin-win32-x64
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads582
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.918

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.4/30PR acceptance — 101/103 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs101
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14/25Owner reach — 87 followers of nickderobertis
25/25Track record — 158 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers87
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginnickderobertis
public_repos158
account_age_days3,747
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-web, @nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin, @nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin-linux-x64, @nickderobertis/allowlister-remote-plugin-win32-x64
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

27At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

87Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, apps/web/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-broker/benches/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-broker/benches/CLAUDE.md, crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/benches/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/benches/CLAUDE.md, crates/allowlister-remote-plugin/benches/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-plugin/benches/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, apps/web/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-broker/benches/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-broker/benches/CLAUDE.md, crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/benches/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/benches/CLAUDE.md, crates/allowlister-remote-plugin/benches/AGENTS.md, crates/allowlister-remote-plugin/benches/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes23,378

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

84Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — apps/web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 61 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapps/web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.61
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/allowlister-remote-broker/Cargo.toml, crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml, crates/allowlister-remote-e2e/Cargo.toml, crates/allowlister-remote-plugin/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/114 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes30,860
source_files_sampled114
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
110commits, last 12 months
21days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'allowlister-remote-e2e' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'allowlister-remote-broker' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'allowlister-remote-daemon' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'allowlister-remote-plugin' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 20:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1package.json
npmnext^16.2.9package.json
npmreact^19.2.6package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.6package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0package.json
crates.ioaxum0.8crates/allowlister-remote-broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1crates/allowlister-remote-broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3crates/allowlister-remote-broker/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/allowlister-remote-broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1crates/allowlister-remote-broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3crates/allowlister-remote-broker/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-tungstenite0.24crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls0.23crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls-pemfile2crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.iowebpki-roots0.26crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing-subscriber0.3crates/allowlister-remote-daemon/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.228crates/allowlister-remote-plugin/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150crates/allowlister-remote-plugin/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with nickderobertis/allowlister-remote. Read them side by side →

100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional99rust-lang/rustEmpowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.Exceptional99astral-sh/ruffAn extremely fast Python linter and code formatter, written in Rust.Exceptional99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional99vercel/next.jsThe React FrameworkExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.