Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 09:48 UTC

nnjeim / world

A Laravel package which provides a list of the countries, states, cities, currencies, timezones, languages and IP Geolocation.

PHPMIT★ 982 stars⑂ 142 forkssince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#laravel#laravel-package#countries-api#countries#states#cities#timezones#currencies#languages#language#country#geoip#geolocation#geolocation-api

nnjeim/world holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on Security (30/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Najm NjeimPersonal account
19 followers5 public repossince Feb 2021

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnnjeim/world1.1.3841,7279162 days agogeolocationmaxmindgeoiplaravelstatescountrieslanguagescurrenciescitiestimezoneslumenip-location

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18Commit volume — 49 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year49
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 7 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 162 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~68.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tag1.1.38
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release162
mean_days_between_releases68.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

73Good
How it's scored
48.5/60Stars — 982 stars
17.9/25Forks — 142 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks142
stars982
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

67Good
How it's scored
61.6/80Monthly downloads — 41,727 downloads/month across packagist
5.2/20Registry dependents — 5 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnnjeim/world
dependents5
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads500,801
monthly_downloads41,727
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 32 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled32
top_contributor_share0.458

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
39.8/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
23.2/30PR acceptance — 44/57 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs44
open_issues5
closed_issues92
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.948
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

45Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.4/25Owner reach — 19 followers of nnjeim
16.5/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers19
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginnnjeim
public_repos5
account_age_days1,981
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 162 days ago
20/20Version history — 9 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnnjeim/world
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish162

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, laravel-package, countries-api, countries, states, cities, timezones, currencies, languages, language, country, geoip, geolocation, geolocation-api
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

30At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/124 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes12,255
source_files_sampled124
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

982GitHub stars
32contributors
49commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
7releases
2bus factor
5open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10
3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 09:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 6/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistgeoip2/geoip2^2.13composer.json
All dependencies 106

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 106 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbrick/math0.10.2indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.0.6indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.5.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer2.1.0indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.3.2indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator3.2.5indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.21.0indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.2.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.4.3indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.0.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework9.46.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure1.2.2indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.3.8indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.12.1indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.11.0indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.5.1indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog2.8.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.11.0indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon2.65.0indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.2.3indirect
Packagistnette/utils3.2.8indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.15.2indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind1.15.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench7.18.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core7.18.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.23indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.5.27indirect
Packagistpimple/pimple3.5.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.0.0indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.7.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistspatie/backtrace1.2.1indirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-ray1.31.0indirect
Packagistspatie/macroable2.0.0indirect
Packagistspatie/ray1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/console6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher6.2.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation6.2.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel6.2.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer6.2.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime6.2.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php721.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process6.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch6.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.2.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid6.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml6.2.2indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.1indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.2.6indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.5.0indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.0.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.11.0indirect
Packagistzbateson/mail-mime-parser2.2.3indirect
Packagistzbateson/mb-wrapper1.1.2indirect
Packagistzbateson/stream-decorators1.0.7indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with nnjeim/world. Read them side by side →

83annexare/CountriesCountries, Languages & Continents data (capital and currency, native name, calling codes).Excellent94maxmind/GeoIP2-phpPHP API for GeoIP2 webservice client and database reader Exceptional87maxmind/MaxMind-DB-Reader-phpPHP Reader for the MaxMind DB Database FormatExcellent91maxmind/GeoIP2-dotnetMaxMind GeoIP2 .NET APIExcellent94statamic/cmsThe core Laravel CMS Composer packageExceptional94bagisto/bagistoFree and open source laravel eCommerce platformExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.