Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 11:13 UTC

nordscope-fi / Discord-stoat-ferry

Migration tool for Discord to Stoat

PythonMIT★ 9 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolDesktop applicationLibraryhow this is determined
#discord#migration#nicegui#python#revolt#stoat#discord-migration

nordscope-fi/Discord-stoat-ferry holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Peter SterkenburgPersonal account
2 followers2 public repossince Jan 2026

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdiscord-ferry2.32.05,5211010 days agodiscordguimigrationrevoltstoat

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 656 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year656
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.32.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

17Critical
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars — 9 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars9
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

62Moderate
How it's scored
49.9/80Monthly downloads — 5,521 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdiscord-ferry
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,521
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.998

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
39.7/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 152/161 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs152
open_issues22
closed_issues382
prs_merged_7d40
prs_decided_7d41
prs_merged_30d58
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.946
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

23At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of nordscope-fi
4.7/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginnordscope-fi
public_repos2
account_age_days230
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 101 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdiscord-ferry
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdiscord, migration, nicegui, python, revolt, stoat, discord-migration
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.7

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages121
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 121 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/discord_ferry/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 94 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/discord_ferry/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.94
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

76Good
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/discord_ferry/py.typed)
49.2/55Manageable file sizes — 13/123 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes211,085
source_files_sampled123
oversized_source_files13

Key facts

9GitHub stars
2contributors
656commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
22open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:discord-ferry@2.32.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312026-032026-042026-06
Major 1Minor 6Patch 24
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-23 11:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiohttp>=3.14pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi>=2024.0pyproject.toml
PyPIclick>=8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIijson>=3.0pyproject.toml
PyPImultidict>=4.5pyproject.toml
PyPInicegui>=3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv—pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIyarl>=1.17pyproject.toml
All dependencies 121

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 112 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3direct
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22direct
PyPIclick8.3.3direct
PyPIijson3.5.0direct
PyPImultidict6.7.1direct
PyPInicegui3.12.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIyarl1.23.0direct
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaioresponses0.7.8indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIaltgraph0.17.5indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanybadge1.16.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.4.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs7.0indirect
PyPIbidict0.23.1indirect
PyPIbottle0.13.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclr-loader0.2.10indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcosmic-ray8.7.0indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdiscord-ferry2.32.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexit-codes1.3.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.136.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.59indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.5indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttptools0.7.1indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIifaddr0.2.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.0indirect
PyPIlxml-html-clean0.4.4indirect
PyPImacholib1.16.4indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkdown22.5.5indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.6indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImypy2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpefile2024.8.26indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIproxy-tools0.1.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyinstaller6.20.0indirect
PyPIpyinstaller-hooks-contrib2026.5indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-core12.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-cocoa12.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-quartz12.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-security12.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-uniformtypeidentifiers12.1indirect
PyPIpyobjc-framework-webkit12.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-engineio4.13.3indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpython-socketio5.16.3indirect
PyPIpythonnet3.0.5indirect
PyPIpywebview6.2.1indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIqtpy2.4.3indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIruff0.15.13indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIsimple-websocket1.1.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.52indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIstevedore5.9.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.47.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.1indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwsproto1.3.2indirect
PyPIyattag1.16.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 121 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
lxml-html-clean0.4.4indirecthigh20.4.5

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with nordscope-fi/Discord-stoat-ferry. Read them side by side →

100reflex-dev/reflex🕸️ Web apps in pure Python 🐍Exceptional97zauberzeug/niceguiCreate web-based user interfaces with Python. The nice way.Exceptional96AstrBotDevs/AstrBotAI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨Exceptional100matplotlib/matplotlibmatplotlib: plotting with PythonExceptional100python-pillow/PillowPython Imaging Library (fork)Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.