Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 21:38 UTC

nsbno / terraform-provider-vy

A provider to use central Cognito user pool and handle artifact versions

GoMPL-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Mar 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

nsbno/terraform-provider-vy holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (26/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

VyOrganization
70 followers140 public repossince Aug 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/nsbno/terraform-provider-vyv1.6.2-5022 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 22 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
14.8/18Commit volume — 44 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year44
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push22
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 50 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~25.1 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count50
latest_release_tagv1.6.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases25.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

26At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 55% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.553
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
1.3/30PR acceptance — 11/248 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs237
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.3/25Owner reach — 70 followers of nsbno
25/25Track record — 140 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers70
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginnsbno
public_repos140
account_age_days3,684

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history — 50 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/nsbno/terraform-provider-vy
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://registry.terraform.io/providers/nsbno/vy/latest/docs
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsprovider, terraform-module
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/nsbno/vy/latest/docs
docs_sitehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/nsbno/vy/latest/docs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.8

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories63
affected_packages8
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, moderate 2, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 90 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.9/40Legible commit history — 11 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.11
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — GNUmakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesGNUmakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/42 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes12,869
source_files_sampled42
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
4contributors
44commits, last 12 months
22days since last push
50releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 21:38 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.39.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.31.20go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.24.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.16.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.29.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-testingv1.13.3go.mod
All dependencies 90

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 83 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.39.6direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.31.20direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.24.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.16.1direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.29.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-testingv1.13.3direct
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/armon/go-radixv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.18.24indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/iniv1.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.30.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.35.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.40.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.23.2indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/speakeasyv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/cliv1.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-checkpointv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-ctyv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-pluginv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuidv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hc-installv0.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/logutilsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-execv0.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.27.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validatorsv0.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-addressv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchostv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamuxv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/huandu/xstringsv1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergov0.3.15indirect
Gogithub.com/kunde21/markdownfmt/v3v3.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/goutilsv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/sprig/v3v3.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructurev1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalkv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/runv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/posener/completev1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpackv4.0.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmark-metav1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.17.0indirect
Gogo.abhg.dev/goldmark/frontmatterv0.2.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230626212559-97b1e661b5dfindirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.28.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.17.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.30.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.37.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appenginev1.6.8indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20200711021454-869866162049indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.75.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.9indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 90 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.42.0indirectcritical350.56.0
google.golang.org/grpcv1.75.1indirectcritical101.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.1indirectmoderate21.6.3
golang.org/x/netv0.44.0indirectmoderate111.27.0-rc.3
github.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.7indirectunknown11.7.17
golang.org/x/modv0.28.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.36.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.30.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.