Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 10:30 UTC

nuke-build / nuke

🏗 The AKEless Build System for C#/.NET

C#MIT★ 3,749 stars⑂ 458 forkssince Jun 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

nuke-build/nuke holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (93/100) and lowest on Vitality (36/100). It was last updated 263 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

nuke-buildOrganization
59 followers1 public reposince Mar 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 263 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence3/52 weeks with commits
11.9/18Commit volume20 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year20
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push263
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases97 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 263 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~46.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count97
latest_release_tag10.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release263
mean_days_between_releases46.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

93Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
58/60Stars3,749 stars
22.2/25Forks458 forks
9.8/15Watchers60 watchers
Inputs used
forks458
stars3,749
watchers60
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges13
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Total downloads73,239,197 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesNuke.Build.Shared, Nuke.Build, Nuke.Common, Nuke.Components
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads73,239,197
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 91% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.908
How it's scored
39/42Issue resolution93% of issues closed
19.9/30PR acceptance321/485 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs321
open_issues66
closed_issues865
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.929
closed_unmerged_prs164
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
12.8/25Owner reach59 followers of nuke-build
14.2/25Track record1 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers59
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnuke-build
public_repos1
account_age_days3,432
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 263 days ago
20/20Version history132 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesNuke.Build.Shared, Nuke.Build, Nuke.Common, Nuke.Components
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish263

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://nuke.build
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbuild-automation, continuous-integration, orchestration, nuke
has_wikino
homepagehttps://nuke.build
docs_sitehttps://nuke.build
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool detected
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages5
unassessed_packages45
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 5 resolved dependencies against OSV. 45 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history85 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.85
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap.teamcity/pom.xml, build/_build.csproj, source/Nuke.Build.Shared/Nuke.Build.Shared.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests.teamcity/pom.xml, build/_build.csproj, source/Nuke.Build.Shared/Nuke.Build.Shared.csproj, source/Nuke.Build.Tests/Nuke.Build.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj, source/Nuke.Common.Tests/Nuke.Common.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.Common/CI/TeamCity/Configuration/pom.xml, source/Nuke.Common/Nuke.Common.csproj, source/Nuke.Components/Nuke.Components.csproj, source/Nuke.GlobalTool.Tests/Nuke.GlobalTool.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.GlobalTool/Nuke.GlobalTool.csproj, source/Nuke.GlobalTool/templates/_build.csproj, source/Nuke.MSBuildTasks/Nuke.MSBuildTasks.csproj, source/Nuke.ProjectModel.Tests/Nuke.ProjectModel.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.ProjectModel/Nuke.ProjectModel.csproj, source/Nuke.SolutionModel.Tests/Nuke.SolutionModel.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.SolutionModel/Nuke.SolutionModel.csproj, source/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.SourceGenerators/Nuke.SourceGenerators.csproj, source/Nuke.Tooling.Generator/Nuke.Tooling.Generator.csproj, source/Nuke.Tooling.Tests/Nuke.Tooling.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.Tooling/Nuke.Tooling.csproj, source/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Compression/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Compression.csproj, source/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Globbing/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Globbing.csproj, source/Nuke.Utilities.Net/Nuke.Utilities.Net.csproj, source/Nuke.Utilities.Tests/Nuke.Utilities.Tests.csproj, source/Nuke.Utilities.Text.Json/Nuke.Utilities.Text.Json.csproj, source/Nuke.Utilities.Text.Yaml/Nuke.Utilities.Text.Yaml.csproj, source/Nuke.Utilities/Nuke.Utilities.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes21/628 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes2,417,681
source_files_sampled628
oversized_source_files21

Key facts

3,749GitHub stars
100contributors
20commits, last 12 months
263days since last push
97releases
1bus factor
66open issues
Maven, NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch maven package 'NUKE_GENERATED:NUKE_GENERATED' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 458 ⇿
0Stars
458Forks
97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500457192017-072022-012026-08
Major 5Minor 25Patch 67

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 10:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 53
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlin${teamcity.dsl.version}.teamcity/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlin-plugins1.0-SNAPSHOT.teamcity/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8${kotlin.version}.teamcity/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-script-runtime${kotlin.version}.teamcity/pom.xml
NuGetlinqtotwitter6.15.0build/_build.csproj
NuGetMQTTnet4.3.7.1207build/_build.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing2.1.7build/_build.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Jsonsource/Nuke.Build.Shared/Nuke.Build.Shared.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsightssource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModelsource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetNJsonSchemasource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetNJsonSchema.NewtonsoftJsonsource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compactsource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compact.Readersource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Consolesource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Filesource/Nuke.Build/Nuke.Build.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identitysource/Nuke.Common/Nuke.Common.csproj
NuGetAzure.Security.KeyVault.Certificatessource/Nuke.Common/Nuke.Common.csproj
NuGetAzure.Security.KeyVault.Keyssource/Nuke.Common/Nuke.Common.csproj
NuGetAzure.Security.KeyVault.Secretssource/Nuke.Common/Nuke.Common.csproj
NuGetOctokitsource/Nuke.Common/Nuke.Common.csproj
NuGetmatkoch.spectre.consolesource/Nuke.GlobalTool/Nuke.GlobalTool.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpsource/Nuke.GlobalTool/Nuke.GlobalTool.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuildsource/Nuke.GlobalTool/Nuke.GlobalTool.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Commonsource/Nuke.GlobalTool/Nuke.GlobalTool.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Packagingsource/Nuke.MSBuildTasks/Nuke.MSBuildTasks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Coresource/Nuke.MSBuildTasks/Nuke.MSBuildTasks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Frameworksource/Nuke.MSBuildTasks/Nuke.MSBuildTasks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Locatorsource/Nuke.ProjectModel/Nuke.ProjectModel.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Buildsource/Nuke.ProjectModel/Nuke.ProjectModel.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Frameworksource/Nuke.ProjectModel/Nuke.ProjectModel.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Tasks.Coresource/Nuke.ProjectModel/Nuke.ProjectModel.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Coresource/Nuke.ProjectModel/Nuke.ProjectModel.csproj
NuGetmatkoch.Microsoft.VisualStudio.SolutionPersistencesource/Nuke.SolutionModel/Nuke.SolutionModel.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpsource/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspacessource/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.SourceGeneratorssource/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.NetStandard20source/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests/Nuke.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj
NuGetmatkoch.Microsoft.VisualStudio.SolutionPersistencesource/Nuke.SourceGenerators/Nuke.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpsource/Nuke.SourceGenerators/Nuke.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzerssource/Nuke.SourceGenerators/Nuke.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonsource/Nuke.SourceGenerators/Nuke.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetScribansource/Nuke.SourceGenerators/Nuke.SourceGenerators.csproj
NuGetHtmlAgilityPacksource/Nuke.Tooling.Generator/Nuke.Tooling.Generator.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonsource/Nuke.Tooling.Generator/Nuke.Tooling.Generator.csproj
NuGetHumanizersource/Nuke.Tooling.Generator/Nuke.Tooling.Generator.csproj
NuGetSerilogsource/Nuke.Tooling.Generator/Nuke.Tooling.Generator.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotationssource/Nuke.Tooling.Generator/Nuke.Tooling.Generator.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsonsource/Nuke.Tooling/Nuke.Tooling.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Packagingsource/Nuke.Tooling/Nuke.Tooling.csproj
NuGetSerilogsource/Nuke.Tooling/Nuke.Tooling.csproj
NuGetSharpZipLibsource/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Compression/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Compression.csproj
NuGetGlobsource/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Globbing/Nuke.Utilities.IO.Globbing.csproj
All dependencies 50

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 44 direct and 6 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-script-runtimedirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8direct
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlindirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:configs-dsl-kotlin-plugins1.0-SNAPSHOTdirect
NuGetAzure.Identitydirect
NuGetAzure.Security.KeyVault.Certificatesdirect
NuGetAzure.Security.KeyVault.Keysdirect
NuGetAzure.Security.KeyVault.Secretsdirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.NetStandard20direct
NuGetGlobdirect
NuGetHtmlAgilityPackdirect
NuGetHumanizerdirect
NuGetlinqtotwitter6.15.0direct
NuGetmatkoch.Microsoft.VisualStudio.SolutionPersistencedirect
NuGetmatkoch.spectre.consoledirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsightsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Builddirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Frameworkdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Locatordirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Tasks.Coredirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Coredirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzersdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharpdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspacesdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Commondirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuilddirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModeldirect
NuGetMQTTnet4.3.7.1207direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Jsondirect
NuGetNJsonSchemadirect
NuGetNJsonSchema.NewtonsoftJsondirect
NuGetNuGet.Packagingdirect
NuGetOctokitdirect
NuGetScribandirect
NuGetSerilogdirect
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compactdirect
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compact.Readerdirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Consoledirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Filedirect
NuGetSharpZipLibdirect
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing2.1.7direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotationsdirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Jsondirect
NuGetVerify.SourceGeneratorsdirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.teamcity:teamcity-configs-maven-pluginindirect
NuGetJetBrains.Annotationsindirect
NuGetNuke.Common_NUKE_VERSION_indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Httpindirect
NuGetYamlDotNetindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 5 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 45 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.