Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 16:34 UTC

nukleros / support-services-operator

A Kubernetes operator for managing tenant workload support services

GoNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

nukleros/support-services-operator holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (59/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 15 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

39
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

39
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

nuklerosOrganization
3 followers15 public repossince Oct 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/nukleros/support-services-operatorv0.7.0-2215 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

50Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

32At Risk
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 15 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push15
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

76Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 21 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~137.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tagv0.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases137.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 70% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.701

Issue & PR responsiveness

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
15/30PR acceptance — 11/22 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of nukleros
18.3/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginnukleros
public_repos15
account_age_days1,742
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20Version history — 22 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/nukleros/support-services-operator
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.3

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

73Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — .codegen/Makefile, .codegen/preserved-assets/Makefile, .operator-builder/Makefile, .operator-builder/assets/Makefile, Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files.codegen/Makefile, .codegen/preserved-assets/Makefile, .operator-builder/Makefile, .operator-builder/assets/Makefile, Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes — 4/257 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes1,910,674
source_files_sampled257
oversized_source_files4

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
5contributors
1commits, last 12 months
15days since last push
21releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 16:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1CI-Tests1 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 9/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.2.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/nukleros/operator-builder-toolsv0.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.7.3go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.24.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.24.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.24.2go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.12.1go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v3v3.4.1go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.1.3go.mod
All dependencies 93

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 80 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.2.3direct
Gogithub.com/nukleros/operator-builder-tools0.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v22.1.3direct
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomega1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.7.3direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0direct
Gok8s.io/api0.24.2direct
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.24.2direct
Gok8s.io/client-go0.24.2direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime0.12.1direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/kubebuilder/v33.4.1direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.3.0direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute1.6.1indirect
Goemperror.dev/errors0.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest14.2.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/autorest0.11.18indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/autorest/adal0.9.13indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/autorest/date0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/logger0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-autorest/tracing0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/banzaicloud/k8s-objectmatcher1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/banzaicloud/operator-tools0.28.4indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/briandowns/spinner1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cppforlife/go-patch0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch5.6.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/color1.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/form3tech-oss/jwt-go3.2.3+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/zapr1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.19.5indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.21.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gobuffalo/flect0.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcache0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daindirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.5.8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/iancoleman/orderedmap0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergo0.3.13indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorable0.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.14indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions1.0.2-0.20181231171920-c182affec369indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/nukleros/desired0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nxadm/tail1.4.8indirect
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo1.16.5indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.12.2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.35.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.7.3indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cast1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/wayneashleyberry/terminal-dimensions1.1.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomic1.9.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierr1.8.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zap1.19.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20220214200702-86341886e292indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20220617184016-355a448f1bc9indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.0.0-20220608161450-d0670ef3b1ebindirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20220615213510-4f61da869c0cindirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.0.0-20220526004731-065cf7ba2467indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.3.7indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.0.0-20220609170525-579cf78fd858indirect
Gogomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v22.2.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appengine1.6.7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.28.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/check.v11.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6cindirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/tomb.v11.0.0-20141024135613-dd632973f1e7indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver0.24.2indirect
Gok8s.io/component-base0.24.2indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.60.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20220614142933-1062c7ade5f8indirect
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20220210201930-3a6ce19ff2f9indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20220525155127-227cbc7cc124indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.2.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with nukleros/support-services-operator. Read them side by side →

100cilium/ciliumeBPF-based Networking, Security, and ObservabilityExceptional100moby/mobyThe Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systemsExceptional100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100grafana/lokiLike Prometheus, but for logs.Exceptional100mattermost/mattermostMattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle..Exceptional100openfga/openfgaA high performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google ZanzibarExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.