Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 07:08 UTC

numaproj / numaflow-java

Numaflow Java SDK

JavaApache-2.0★ 28 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

numaproj/numaflow-java holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

numaprojOrganization
152 followers18 public repossince Apr 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenio.numaproj.numaflow:numaflow-java0.13.0-2656 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 10 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
10.3/18Commit volume13 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year13
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push10
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases32 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 56 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~82.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tagv0.13.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases82.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23.2/60Stars28 stars
9/25Forks13 forks
6/15Watchers13 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars28
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth16 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.457
How it's scored
27.4/42Issue resolution65% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance160/174 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs160
open_issues17
closed_issues32
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.653
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.7/25Owner reach152 followers of numaproj
18.2/25Track record18 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers152
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginnumaproj
public_repos18
account_age_days1,622

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 56 days ago
20/20Version history26 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesio.numaproj.numaflow:numaflow-java
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests16 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava, numaflow, numaflow-sdk
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.2/2.5CI-Tests16 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
8.9/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.19.0 (high 8.1), io.netty:netty-codec-http2 4.2.1.Final (high 7.5), io.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll 4.2.1.Final (moderate 4.0), +1 more
3.3/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories7 affected: io.netty:netty-handler 4.2.1.Final (critical 9.1), com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.19.0 (high 7.5), io.netty:netty-codec 4.1.110.Final (high 7.5), +4 more
14.9/40No advisories left outstanding10 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 396 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories48
affected_packages11
assessed_packages53
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 7, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages4
Matched the maven:io.numaproj.numaflow:numaflow-java@0.13.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 53 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapexamples/pom.xml, pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsexamples/pom.xml, pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes1/304 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes150,960
source_files_sampled304
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)src/main/proto/accumulator/v1/accumulator.proto, src/main/proto/common/metadata.proto, src/main/proto/common/nack_options.proto, src/main/proto/map/v1/map.proto, src/main/proto/reduce/v1/reduce.proto, src/main/proto/serving/v1/store.proto, src/main/proto/sessionreduce/v1/sessionreduce.proto, src/main/proto/sideinput/v1/sideinput.proto, src/main/proto/sink/v1/sink.proto, src/main/proto/source/v1/source.proto, src/main/proto/sourcetransform/v1/sourcetransformer.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filessrc/main/proto/accumulator/v1/accumulator.proto, src/main/proto/common/metadata.proto, src/main/proto/common/nack_options.proto, src/main/proto/map/v1/map.proto, src/main/proto/reduce/v1/reduce.proto, src/main/proto/serving/v1/store.proto, src/main/proto/sessionreduce/v1/sessionreduce.proto, src/main/proto/sideinput/v1/sideinput.proto, src/main/proto/sink/v1/sink.proto, src/main/proto/source/v1/source.proto, src/main/proto/sourcetransform/v1/sourcetransformer.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

28GitHub stars
16contributors
13commits, last 12 months
10days since last push
32releases
2bus factor
17open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151312022-102024-052025-11
Major 0Minor 7Patch 22

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 07:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5CI-Tests16 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java${protobuf.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-netty${grpc.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-protobufpom.xml
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-stubpom.xml
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-inprocesspom.xml
Mavenjavax.annotation:javax.annotation-api1.3.2pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll${netty.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll${netty.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-kqueue${netty.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.netty:netty-codec-http2${netty.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.projectlombok:lombok1.18.30pom.xml
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-testingpom.xml
Mavencom.typesafe.akka:akka-actor_3${akka.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api${slf4j.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.19.0pom.xml
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-bom${grpc.version}pom.xml
All dependencies 29

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 14 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.19.0direct
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java4.31.0direct
Mavencom.typesafe.akka:akka-actor_32.8.5direct
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-bom1.72.0direct
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-inprocessdirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-netty1.72.0direct
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-protobufdirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-stubdirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-testingdirect
Mavenio.netty:netty-codec-http24.2.1direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll4.2.1direct
Mavenio.netty:netty-transport-native-kqueue4.2.1direct
Mavenjavax.annotation:javax.annotation-api1.3.2direct
Mavenorg.projectlombok:lombok1.18.30direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.17direct
Mavencom.google.cloud.tools:jib-maven-plugin3.3.0indirect
Mavenio.numaproj.numaflow:numaflow-java0.13.0indirect
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin3.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin1.5indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin2.2.1indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.7indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter5.10.2indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core4.8.1indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple2.0.17indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple2.0.7indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.8.0indirect
Mavenorg.xolstice.maven.plugins:protobuf-maven-plugin0.6.1indirect
Dependency advisories 11

Installing maven:io.numaproj.numaflow:numaflow-java@0.13.0 pulls in 53 packages, direct and transitive: 11 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
io.netty:netty-handler4.2.1.Finalindirectcritical54.2.17.Final
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.19.0directhigh53.1.4
io.netty:netty-codec-http24.2.1.Finaldirecthigh84.2.16.Final
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core2.19.0indirecthigh23.1.4
io.netty:netty-codec4.1.110.Finalindirecthigh34.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-compression4.2.1.Finalindirecthigh34.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-http4.2.1.Finalindirecthigh184.2.17.Final
io.netty:netty-transport-classes-epoll4.2.1.Finalindirecthigh14.2.13.Final
io.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll4.2.1.Finaldirectmoderate14.2.15.Final
io.netty:netty-transport-native-kqueue4.2.1.Finaldirectmoderate14.2.15.Final
io.netty:netty-handler-proxy4.1.110.Finalindirectmoderate14.2.13.Final

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.