Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 06:56 UTC

numerous-com / numerous-sdk

Numerous SDK and CLI. Use the SDK for integrating your Python apps with Numerous so you can share them with users and use the features of the Numerous platform.

Go · PythonNo license detected★ 8 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#apps #cloud-computing #paas #python #saas #saas-api #sdk #sdk-python

numerous-com/numerous-sdk holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (28/100). It was last updated 56 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

numerousOrganization

13 followers16 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	numerous	0.51.2	2,037	95	56 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

31At Risk

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 56 days ago
2.8/36	Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
9/18	Commit volume — 9 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	9
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	56
active_weeks_last_year	4

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~48 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v0.51.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	56
mean_days_between_releases	48

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

28At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	8
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

45Weak

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 59% of commits
12.2/13.5	Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	9
top_contributor_share	0.593

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.3/30	PR acceptance — 82/84 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	82
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
8.2/25	Owner reach — 13 followers of numerous-com
14.5/25	Track record — 16 public repos, account ~2 yr old

Inputs used

followers	13
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	numerous-com
public_repos	16
account_age_days	1,008

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 56 days ago
20/20	Version history — 95 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	numerous
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yml, .ruff.toml, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
6/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.numerous.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 8 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	apps, cloud-computing, paas, python, saas, saas-api, sdk, sdk-python
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://www.numerous.com
docs_site	https://www.numerous.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 5 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	16
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:numerous@0.51.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 16 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

35Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.2/40	Legible commit history — 66 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.66
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yml, .ruff.toml, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — python/src/numerous/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	python/src/numerous/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/453 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	30,988
source_files_sampled	453
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars

9contributors

9commits, last 12 months

56days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch go package 'numerous.com/cli' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10

4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 06:56 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
3	CI-Tests	5 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
2	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
9	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 20

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	git.sr.ht/~emersion/gqlclient	`v0.0.0-20250318184027-d4a003529bba`	go.mod
Go	github.com/AlecAivazis/survey/v2	`v2.3.7`	go.mod
Go	github.com/BurntSushi/toml	`v1.5.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hasura/go-graphql-client	`v0.14.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx	`v1.2.31`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pkg/browser	`v0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141c`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.9.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.6`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.10.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/vektah/gqlparser/v2	`v2.5.26`	go.mod
Go	github.com/zalando/go-keyring	`v0.2.6`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.43.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.37.0`	go.mod
PyPI	typing-extensions	`>=4.12.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.32.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`>=0.23,<1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.9.0,<3.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	websockets	`>=0.11`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pathspec	`—`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 74

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 55 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	git.sr.ht/~emersion/gqlclient	`v0.0.0-20250318184027-d4a003529bba`	direct
Go	github.com/alecaivazis/survey/v2	`v2.3.7`	direct
Go	github.com/burntsushi/toml	`v1.5.0`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/lipgloss	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hasura/go-graphql-client	`v0.14.0`	direct
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx	`v1.2.31`	direct
Go	github.com/pkg/browser	`v0.0.0-20240102092130-5ac0b6a4141c`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.9.1`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.6`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.10.0`	direct
Go	github.com/vektah/gqlparser/v2	`v2.5.26`	direct
Go	github.com/zalando/go-keyring	`v0.2.6`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/term	`v0.43.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.37.0`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`—`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`—`	direct
PyPI	requests	`—`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`—`	direct
PyPI	websockets	`—`	direct
Go	al.essio.dev/pkg/shellescape	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/agnivade/levenshtein	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2	`v2.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.8.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbuf	`v0.0.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/term	`v0.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/coder/websocket	`v1.8.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/danieljoos/wincred	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4	`v4.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-json	`v0.10.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/godbus/dbus/v5	`v5.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/kballard/go-shellquote	`v0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/backoff/v2	`v2.0.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagic	`v1.0.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/httpcc	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/iter	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/lestrrat-go/option	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.14`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.16`	indirect
Go	github.com/mgutz/ansi	`v0.0.0-20200706080929-d51e80ef957d`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/termenv	`v0.16.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pkg/errors	`v0.9.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/stretchr/objx	`v0.5.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/xo/terminfo	`v0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41e`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.52.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.45.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	ariadne-codegen	`—`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	freezegun	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	marimo	`0.8.14`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-gen-files	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-literate-nav	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`9.5.46`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-section-index	`0.3.9`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-snippet-plugin	`1.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`0.26.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`1.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`1.11.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`8.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`0.24.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.6.4`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`5.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	types-requests	`—`	indirect
PyPI	types-setuptools	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:numerous@0.51.2 pulls in 16 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records