Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 05:32 UTC

nunomaduro / phpinsights

🔰 Instant PHP quality checks from your console

PHPMIT★ 5,631 stars⑂ 299 forkssince Mar 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

nunomaduro/phpinsights holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (53/100). It was last updated 23 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

nuno maduroPersonal account
9,322 followers319 public repossince Sep 2013@laravel

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistnunomaduro/phpinsightsv2.14.2267,49351137 days agophpsourcecodeconsoleinsightsquality

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 23 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
14.2/18Commit volume — 37 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year37
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push23
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 23 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 137 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~98.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv2.14.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release137
mean_days_between_releases98.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 5,631 stars
20.6/25Forks — 299 forks
9.8/15Watchers — 60 watchers
Inputs used
forks299
stars5,631
watchers60
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
72.4/80Monthly downloads — 267,493 downloads/month across packagist
17.7/20Registry dependents — 448 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesnunomaduro/phpinsights
dependents448
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads12,261,842
monthly_downloads267,493
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 56% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.555
How it's scored
34.6/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
23.6/30PR acceptance — 271/344 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs271
open_issues69
closed_issues324
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.824
closed_unmerged_prs73
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach — 9,322 followers of nunomaduro
25/25Track record — 319 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers9,322
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginnunomaduro
public_repos319
account_age_days4,730
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 137 days ago
20/20Version history — 51 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnunomaduro/phpinsights
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish137

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://youtube.com/@nunomaduro?sub_confirmation=1
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, static, analytics, code, quality, style, cs, architecture, complexity, console, cli, tool, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://youtube.com/@nunomaduro?sub_confirmation=1
docs_sitehttps://youtube.com/@nunomaduro?sub_confirmation=1
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
15.4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: squizlabs/php_codesniffer 3.3.1 (high)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages3
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages61
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 8 resolved dependencies against OSV. 61 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 71 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.763
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/198 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes22,051
source_files_sampled198
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

5,631GitHub stars
98contributors
37commits, last 12 months
23days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
69open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 299 ⇿
0Stars
299Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

050100150200250300294362019-042022-122026-08
Major 1Minor 15Patch 7

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 05:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests7 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 31 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistcmgmyr/phploc^8.0.7composer.json
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer^3.95.18composer.json
Packagistleague/container^5.2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/container^2.0.2composer.json
Packagistpsr/simple-cache^2.0|^3.0composer.json
Packagistsebastian/diff^7.0|^8.0|^9.0composer.json
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard^8.22.1composer.json
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer^3.13.5composer.json
Packagistsymfony/cache^7.4.5|^8.1.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4.4|^8.1.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/finder^7.4.5|^8.1.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client^7.4.5|^8.1.3composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.4.5|^8.1.0composer.json
All dependencies 69

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 55 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcmgmyr/phploc—direct
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—direct
Packagistleague/container—direct
Packagistpsr/container—direct
Packagistpsr/simple-cache—direct
Packagistsebastian/diff—direct
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard—direct
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer—direct
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.3.1direct
Packagistsymfony/cache—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/finder—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-client—direct
Packagistsymfony/process—direct
npmvuepress^0.14.11indirect
Packagistallure-framework/allure-phpunit—indirect
Packagistbeyondcode/laravel-dump-server—indirect
Packagistcodeception/base—indirect
Packagistcodeception/specify—indirect
Packagistcodeception/verify—indirect
Packagistcomposer/installers—indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver—indirect
Packagistcweagans/composer-patches—indirect
Packagistdrupal/core—indirect
Packagistext-ctype—indirect
Packagistext-iconv—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-mbstring—indirect
Packagistext-tokenizer—indirect
Packagistfideloper/proxy—indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops—indirect
Packagistfzaninotto/faker—indirect
Packagistilluminate/console—indirect
Packagistilluminate/support—indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework—indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker—indirect
Packagistlusitanian/oauth—indirect
Packagistmagento/magento2-functional-testing-framework—indirect
Packagistmagento/product-community-edition2.3.1indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery—indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision—indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/pao—indirect
Packagistoscarotero/env—indirect
Packagistpdepend/pdepend2.5.2indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint—indirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmd—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistroave/security-advisories—indirect
Packagistroots/wordpress5.3.2indirect
Packagistroots/wp-config1.0.0indirect
Packagistroots/wp-password-bcrypt1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/phpcpd—indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dotenv—indirect
Packagistsymfony/flex—indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation3.3.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.11.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv—indirect
Packagistyiisoft/yii2—indirect
Packagistyiisoft/yii2-bootstrap—indirect
Packagistyiisoft/yii2-debug—indirect
Packagistyiisoft/yii2-faker—indirect
Packagistyiisoft/yii2-gii—indirect
Packagistyiisoft/yii2-swiftmailer—indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 8 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 61 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
symfony/http-foundation3.3.11indirectcritical67.3.7
squizlabs/php_codesniffer3.3.1directhigh14.0.2
magento/product-community-edition2.3.1indirecthigh42.3.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.