Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 23:06 UTC

nuzur / nem

nuzur entity manager

ShellMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

nuzur/nem holds a health index of 30 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (9/100). It was last updated 18 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

30
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

30
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 36 is calibrated to 30 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

nuzurOrganization
1 follower9 public repossince Aug 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/nuzur/nemv1.4.0-7418 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 18 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence17/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18Commit volume53 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year53
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push18
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases72 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count72
latest_release_tagv1.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach1 followers of nuzur
19.3/25Track record9 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginnuzur
public_repos9
account_age_days4,030

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 18 days ago
20/20Version history74 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/nuzur/nem
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish18

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

9Critical · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
9.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: google.golang.org/grpc v1.80.0 (critical 9.1)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories48
affected_packages6
assessed_packages31
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1, moderate 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 31 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
3.3/40Legible commit history5 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.061
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice5 of the last 82 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.061
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeShell without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes5/995 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageShell
largest_source_bytes1,125,233
source_files_sampled995
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)idl/proto/ai_usage.proto, idl/proto/array_type_config.proto, idl/proto/automation.proto, idl/proto/automation_event.proto, idl/proto/change_request.proto, idl/proto/change_request_data_change.proto, idl/proto/change_request_metadata.proto, idl/proto/change_request_metadata_data.proto, idl/proto/change_request_review.proto, idl/proto/change_request_scope_config.proto, idl/proto/change_request_scope_config_local.proto, idl/proto/change_request_scope_config_remote.proto, idl/proto/connection.proto, idl/proto/connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/data_change_before_image.proto, idl/proto/data_change_before_image_value.proto, idl/proto/data_change_field_value.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_create.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_delete.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_update.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_update_field.proto, idl/proto/db_type_config.proto, idl/proto/db_type_mysql_config.proto, idl/proto/db_type_postgres_config.proto, idl/proto/deployment.proto, idl/proto/deployment_codegen.proto, idl/proto/deployment_database.proto, idl/proto/deployment_provider.proto, idl/proto/deployment_revision.proto, idl/proto/deployment_server.proto, idl/proto/element_render.proto, idl/proto/entity.proto, idl/proto/entity_data_management_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_type_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_type_dependent_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_type_standalone_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_type_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_type_entity_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_type_field_config.proto, idl/proto/enum.proto, idl/proto/enum_value.proto, idl/proto/enums.proto, idl/proto/enviorment.proto, idl/proto/extension.proto, idl/proto/extension_execution.proto, idl/proto/extension_version.proto, idl/proto/field.proto, idl/proto/field_pii_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_array_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_char_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_date_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_datetime_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_decimal_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_email_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_encrypted_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_enum_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_file_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_float_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_integer_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_json_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_phone_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_slug_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_text_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_url_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_varchar_config.proto, idl/proto/file_object_storage_config.proto, idl/proto/file_storage_config.proto, idl/proto/index.proto, idl/proto/index_field.proto, idl/proto/local_agent.proto, idl/proto/local_agent_connection.proto, idl/proto/membership.proto, idl/proto/object_store.proto, idl/proto/object_store_r_2_type_config.proto, idl/proto/object_store_s_3_type_config.proto, idl/proto/object_store_type_config.proto, idl/proto/project.proto, idl/proto/project_extension.proto, idl/proto/project_version.proto, idl/proto/project_version_deployment.proto, idl/proto/relationship.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node_type_config.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node_type_entity_config.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node_type_service_config.proto, idl/proto/review_config.proto, idl/proto/service.proto, idl/proto/service_nem.proto, idl/proto/store.proto, idl/proto/tcp_ip_connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/tcp_ip_ssh_connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/team.proto, idl/proto/user.proto, idl/proto/user_connection.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_execution.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_local_config.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_remote_config.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/user_project.proto, idl/proto/user_project_version.proto, idl/proto/user_team.proto, idl/proto/visibility.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesidl/proto/ai_usage.proto, idl/proto/array_type_config.proto, idl/proto/automation.proto, idl/proto/automation_event.proto, idl/proto/change_request.proto, idl/proto/change_request_data_change.proto, idl/proto/change_request_metadata.proto, idl/proto/change_request_metadata_data.proto, idl/proto/change_request_review.proto, idl/proto/change_request_scope_config.proto, idl/proto/change_request_scope_config_local.proto, idl/proto/change_request_scope_config_remote.proto, idl/proto/connection.proto, idl/proto/connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/data_change_before_image.proto, idl/proto/data_change_before_image_value.proto, idl/proto/data_change_field_value.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_create.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_delete.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_update.proto, idl/proto/data_change_type_config_update_field.proto, idl/proto/db_type_config.proto, idl/proto/db_type_mysql_config.proto, idl/proto/db_type_postgres_config.proto, idl/proto/deployment.proto, idl/proto/deployment_codegen.proto, idl/proto/deployment_database.proto, idl/proto/deployment_provider.proto, idl/proto/deployment_revision.proto, idl/proto/deployment_server.proto, idl/proto/element_render.proto, idl/proto/entity.proto, idl/proto/entity_data_management_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_type_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_type_dependent_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_type_standalone_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_type_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_type_entity_config.proto, idl/proto/entity_version_type_field_config.proto, idl/proto/enum.proto, idl/proto/enum_value.proto, idl/proto/enums.proto, idl/proto/enviorment.proto, idl/proto/extension.proto, idl/proto/extension_execution.proto, idl/proto/extension_version.proto, idl/proto/field.proto, idl/proto/field_pii_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_array_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_char_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_date_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_datetime_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_decimal_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_email_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_encrypted_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_enum_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_file_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_float_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_integer_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_json_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_phone_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_slug_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_text_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_url_config.proto, idl/proto/field_type_varchar_config.proto, idl/proto/file_object_storage_config.proto, idl/proto/file_storage_config.proto, idl/proto/index.proto, idl/proto/index_field.proto, idl/proto/local_agent.proto, idl/proto/local_agent_connection.proto, idl/proto/membership.proto, idl/proto/object_store.proto, idl/proto/object_store_r_2_type_config.proto, idl/proto/object_store_s_3_type_config.proto, idl/proto/object_store_type_config.proto, idl/proto/project.proto, idl/proto/project_extension.proto, idl/proto/project_version.proto, idl/proto/project_version_deployment.proto, idl/proto/relationship.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node_type_config.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node_type_entity_config.proto, idl/proto/relationship_node_type_service_config.proto, idl/proto/review_config.proto, idl/proto/service.proto, idl/proto/service_nem.proto, idl/proto/store.proto, idl/proto/tcp_ip_connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/tcp_ip_ssh_connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/team.proto, idl/proto/user.proto, idl/proto/user_connection.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_execution.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_local_config.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_remote_config.proto, idl/proto/user_connection_type_config.proto, idl/proto/user_project.proto, idl/proto/user_project_version.proto, idl/proto/user_team.proto, idl/proto/visibility.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
53commits, last 12 months
18days since last push
72releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.7 / 10
2.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 23:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/Nerzal/gocloak/v13v13.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.9.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofrs/uuidv4.4.0+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/guregu/null/v6v6.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatiblego.mod
Gogo.einride.tech/aipv0.86.3go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/configv1.4.1go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.24.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260120221211-b8f7ae30c516go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.80.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
All dependencies 31

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.9.3direct
Gogithub.com/gofrs/uuidv4.4.0+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/guregu/null/v6v6.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/nerzal/gocloak/v13v13.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatibledirect
Gogo.einride.tech/aipv0.86.3direct
Gogo.uber.org/configv1.4.1direct
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.24.0direct
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260120221211-b8f7ae30c516direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.80.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11direct
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-resty/resty/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/prettyv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opentracing/opentracing-gov1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/ksuidv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1indirect
Gogo.uber.org/digv1.19.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.48.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.49.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.36.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260120221211-b8f7ae30c516indirect
Gogopkg.in/check.v1v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6cindirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 31 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.80.0directcritical51.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/cryptov0.48.0indirectcritical300.56.0
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.0.0indirecthigh25.2.2
golang.org/x/netv0.49.0indirectmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.43.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.36.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.