Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 07:39 UTC

nwjs / npm-installer

npm installer for NW.js

JavaScriptMIT★ 167 stars⑂ 54 forkssince Jan 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

nwjs/npm-installer holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

NW.js CommunityOrganization
147 followers14 public repossince Dec 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmnw0.114.017,22275011 days agonwnw.jsnwjschromiumio.jsnode-webkitwebkitinstallerdesktopapplication

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
14.9/18Commit volume — 45 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year45
human_commit_share0.61
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year24

Release discipline

40Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 6 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 3,786 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~76.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv0.13.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release3,786
mean_days_between_releases76.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

56Moderate
How it's scored
36/60Stars — 167 stars
14.4/25Forks — 54 forks
6/15Watchers — 13 watchers
Inputs used
forks54
stars167
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

71Good
How it's scored
56.5/80Monthly downloads — 17,222 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnw
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads17,222
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

63Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 26 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled26
top_contributor_share0.365

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
16.4/30PR acceptance — 124/227 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs124
open_issues1
closed_issues84
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.988
closed_unmerged_prs103
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

83Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
15.6/25Owner reach — 147 followers of nwjs
20.6/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers147
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginnwjs
public_repos14
account_age_days4,252
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history — 750 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnw
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.npmjs.com/package/nw
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/nw
docs_sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/nw
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier33
security_posture_before_jurisdiction66
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages42
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:nw@0.114.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 42 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

17Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16.6/40Legible commit history — 19 of 61 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.311
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

42Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 39 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.39

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/8 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes3,592
source_files_sampled8
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

167GitHub stars
26contributors
45commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
6releases
2bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 54 ⇿
0Stars
54Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605322015-022020-112026-07
Major 0Minor 2Patch 3

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@nwutils/getter^0.2.4package.json
npm@nwutils/runner^0.2.3package.json
npmcommander^15.0.0package.json
npmsemver^7.8.5package.json
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 146 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@nwutils/getter0.2.4direct
npm@nwutils/runner0.2.3direct
npmcommander15.0.0direct
npmsemver7.8.5direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.26.10indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@bazel/runfiles6.5.0indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime0.1.2indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@node-rs/crc321.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-android-arm-eabi1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-android-arm641.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-darwin-arm641.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-darwin-x641.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-freebsd-x641.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-linux-arm64-gnu1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-linux-arm64-musl1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-linux-x64-gnu1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-linux-x64-musl1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-wasm32-wasi1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-win32-arm64-msvc1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-win32-ia32-msvc1.10.0indirect
npm@node-rs/crc32-win32-x64-msvc1.10.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.138.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.8.1indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.9indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.4indirect
npmdefine-properties1.2.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglobalthis1.0.3indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.2indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmimmediate3.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-it-type5.1.2indirect
npmisarray1.0.0indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjszip3.10.1indirect
npmlie3.3.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.2indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmpako1.0.11indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.23indirect
npmprocess-nextick-args2.0.1indirect
npmreadable-stream2.3.8indirect
npmregenerator-runtime0.14.1indirect
npmrolldown1.1.4indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.1.2indirect
npmselenium-webdriver4.45.0indirect
npmsetimmediate1.0.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsimple-invariant2.0.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmstring_decoder1.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtar7.5.22indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtmp0.2.7indirect
npmtslib2.6.2indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvite8.1.3indirect
npmvitest4.1.9indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
npmyauzl-promise4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:nw@0.114.0 pulls in 42 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with nwjs/npm-installer. Read them side by side →

90nwutils/nw-builderBuild NW.js applications for Linux, MacOS and WindowsExcellent73nwutils/getterDownload NW.js and related binaries for Linux, MacOS and WindowsGood42jarek-foksa/xelXel - Widget toolkit for building native-like Electron and Web appsWeak99microsoft/playwrightPlaywright is a framework for Web Testing and Automation. It allows testing Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API. Exceptional80dcouple/PaneTerminal-first, open-source AI agent manager for any CLI agent (agent agnostic), any OS (mac, windows, linux). The Open-Source Agentic Development Environment for running multiple coding agents in parallel. Run locally or self-host Remote Pane to manage agents from desktop or phone. Simplify multi-agent orchestration with the runpane CLI.Excellent78playwright-php/playwrightPlaywright PHP library for browser automation: navigation, E2E tests, assertions, screenshots, and so much more!Good

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.