Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 12:06 UTC

nxtrace / NTrace-dev

NextTrace Dev

GoGPL-3.0★ 389 stars⑂ 35 forkssince Mar 2023forkView on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

nxtrace/NTrace-dev holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

125 followers17 public repossince Jun 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/nxtrace/NTrace-corepoints to another repo — not scoredv1.7.5-10836 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 639 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year639
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year39
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 90 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count90
latest_release_tagv1.7.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases15.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42/60Stars — 389 stars
12.8/25Forks — 35 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks35
stars389
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 75% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 26 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled26
top_contributor_share0.747
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance — 190/226 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs190
open_issues0
closed_issues20
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs36
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.1/25Owner reach — 125 followers of nxtrace
15.8/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers125
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginnxtrace
public_repos17
account_age_days1,220

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.nxtrace.org
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi, as-path, asn-lookup, geoip, geolocation, mtr, nexttrace, traceroute, network-analysis, utility
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.nxtrace.org
docs_sitehttps://www.nxtrace.org
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
4.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages97
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 97 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.openclaw.ai/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 88 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.openclaw.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes32,815
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 12 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.12
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 3/426 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes107,870
source_files_sampled426
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

389GitHub stars
26contributors
639commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
90releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/nxtrace/NTrace-core' points at a different repository (https://github.com/nxtrace/NTrace-core); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 35 ⇿
0Stars
35Forks
83Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383522023-062025-012026-08
Major 0Minor 6Patch 29

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 12:06 UTC

6Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/akamensky/argparsev1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ameshkov/dnscrypt/v2v2.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/logv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/gopacketv1.1.19go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/jedisct1/go-dnsstampsv0.0.0-20251112173516-191fc465df31go.mod
Gogithub.com/jessevdk/go-flagsv1.6.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/jsdelivr/globalping-cliv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.30go.mod
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.73go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.8.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/natesales/qv0.19.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golangv1.13.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.63.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rodaine/tablev1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sthorne/odoh-gov1.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/syndtr/gocapabilityv0.0.0-20200815063812-42c35b437635go.mod
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/tsosunchia/powclientv0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/xjasonlyu/windivert-gov0.0.0-20201010013527-4239d0afa76fgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.41.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.61.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.24.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.49.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.47.0go.mod
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 29 direct and 68 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/akamensky/argparsev1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/ameshkov/dnscrypt/v2v2.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/logv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/gopacketv1.1.19direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/jedisct1/go-dnsstampsv0.0.0-20251112173516-191fc465df31direct
Gogithub.com/jessevdk/go-flagsv1.6.1direct
Gogithub.com/jsdelivr/globalping-cliv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.30direct
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.73direct
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.8.0direct
Gogithub.com/natesales/qv0.19.12direct
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golangv1.13.1direct
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.63.0direct
Gogithub.com/rodaine/tablev1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0direct
Gogithub.com/sthorne/odoh-gov1.0.4direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Gogithub.com/syndtr/gocapabilityv0.0.0-20200815063812-42c35b437635direct
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/tsosunchia/powclientv0.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/xjasonlyu/windivert-gov0.0.0-20201010013527-4239d0afa76fdirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.41.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.61.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.24.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.49.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.47.0direct
Gogithub.com/aclements/go-moremathv0.0.0-20210112150236-f10218a38794indirect
Gogithub.com/adguardteam/golibsv0.35.9indirect
Gogithub.com/ameshkov/dnsstampsv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/gopkgv0.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonicv1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonic/loaderv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.6indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbufv0.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cisco/go-hpkev0.0.0-20230407100446-246075f83609indirect
Gogithub.com/cisco/go-tls-syntaxv0.0.0-20200617162716-46b0cfb76b9bindirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/base64xv0.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.12indirect
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/ssev1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logfmt/logfmtv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/localesv0.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/universal-translatorv0.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.5indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/leodido/go-urnv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/natesales/bgptools-gov0.0.0-20230212051756-2b519d61269cindirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/quic-go/qpackv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/encodingv0.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/matchv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/prettyv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asmv0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/ugorji/go/codecv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2indirect
Gogo.mongodb.org/mongo-driver/v2v2.5.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/archv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260812173653-3d80eb74bc5bindirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/perfv0.0.0-20260825160852-19be9d8e6c70indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 97 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.58.0indirectunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.