Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 09:46 UTC

nyaruka / courier

Messaging gateway for RapidPro/TextIt.

GoCustom license★ 122 stars⑂ 75 forkssince May 2017View on GitHub ↗

nyaruka/courier holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (42/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

nyarukaOrganization
51 followers87 public repossince Jun 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/courier/v26v26.3.12-660 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume670 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year670
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year43
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv26.3.12
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
33.8/60Stars122 stars
15.6/25Forks75 forks
6.4/15Watchers15 watchers
Inputs used
forks75
stars122
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 49% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.494
How it's scored
34.8/42Issue resolution83% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance861/933 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs861
open_issues21
closed_issues102
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.829
closed_unmerged_prs72
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
12.3/25Owner reach51 followers of nyaruka
25/25Track record87 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers51
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginnyaruka
public_repos87
account_age_days5,883
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history66 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/nyaruka/courier/v26
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgolang
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes1/208 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes72,975
source_files_sampled208
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

122GitHub stars
28contributors
670commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
21open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 09:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 26
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/antchfx/xmlqueryv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.42.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/dynamodb/attributevaluev1.20.51go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbv1.60.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.105.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/buger/jsonparserv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/getsentry/sentry-gov0.47.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/gomodule/redigov1.9.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/schemav1.4.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/h2non/filetypev1.1.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.12.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/ezconfv0.6.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/gocommonv1.89.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/goflowv0.281.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/null/v3v3.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/vkutilv0.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/samber/slog-multiv1.8.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/samber/slog-sentry/v2v2.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/vinovest/sqlxv1.7.2go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudwatchv1.62.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0go.mod
All dependencies 75

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/antchfx/xmlqueryv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.42.1direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/dynamodb/attributevaluev1.20.51direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudwatchv1.62.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbv1.60.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.105.0direct
Gogithub.com/buger/jsonparserv1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/getsentry/sentry-gov0.47.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.3direct
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/gomodule/redigov1.9.3direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/schemav1.4.1direct
Gogithub.com/h2non/filetypev1.1.3direct
Gogithub.com/lib/pqv1.12.3direct
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/ezconfv0.6.1direct
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/gocommonv1.89.5direct
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/goflowv0.281.0direct
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/null/v3v3.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/vkutilv0.21.0direct
Gogithub.com/samber/slog-multiv1.8.0direct
Gogithub.com/samber/slog-sentry/v2v2.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/vinovest/sqlxv1.7.2direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/antchfx/xpathv1.3.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.14indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.28indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.30indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.30indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.30indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbstreamsv1.35.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/endpoint-discoveryv1.12.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.30indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.31indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.32.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.44.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.27.3indirect
Gogithub.com/blevesearch/segmentv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/centrifugal/gocent/v3v3.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/structsv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.13indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/localesv0.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/universal-translatorv0.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/jellydator/ttlcache/v3v3.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/leodido/go-urnv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.34indirect
Gogithub.com/muir/listv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/muir/sqltokenv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/naoina/go-stringutilv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/naoina/tomlv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/nyaruka/phonenumbers/v2v2.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/samber/lov1.53.0indirect
Gogithub.com/samber/slog-commonv0.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260611194520-c48552f49976indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.