Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 23:15 UTC

obsidianmd / obsidian-importer

Convert your data to Markdown files you can use in Obsidian. Works with Apple Notes, OneNote, Evernote, Notion, Google Keep, and many other formats.

TypeScriptMIT★ 1,547 stars⑂ 241 forkssince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗

obsidianmd/obsidian-importer holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (75/100) and lowest on Security (43/100). It was last updated 49 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Obsidian.mdOrganization
13,561 followers14 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 49 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence16/52 weeks with commits
16.8/18Commit volume74 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year74
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push49
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases54 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 51 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~22 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count54
latest_release_tag1.8.12
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release51
mean_days_between_releases22

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.7/60Stars1,547 stars
19.8/25Forks241 forks
7.4/15Watchers22 watchers
Inputs used
forks241
stars1,547
watchers22
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth34 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled34
top_contributor_share0.308
How it's scored
26.5/42Issue resolution63% of issues closed
20.5/30PR acceptance71/104 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 7/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs71
open_issues162
closed_issues277
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.631
closed_unmerged_prs33
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach13,561 followers of obsidianmd
20.6/25Track record14 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers13,561
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginobsidianmd
public_repos14
account_age_days2,262
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://help.obsidian.md/import
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics12 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsobsidian, obsidian-plugin, obsidianmd, apple-notes, evernote, google-keep, notion, onenote, bases, markdown, md, csv
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://help.obsidian.md/import
docs_sitehttps://help.obsidian.md/import
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 7/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes1/152 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes78,861
source_files_sampled152
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1,547GitHub stars
34contributors
74commits, last 12 months
49days since last push
54releases
2bus factor
162open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'obsidian-importer' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 23:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 7/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@joplin/turndown-plugin-gfm1.0.62package.json
npm@notionhq/client5.20.0package.json
npm@zip.js/zip.js2.7.60package.json
npmmathml-to-latex^1.5.0package.json
npmplain-tag0.1.3package.json
npmprotobufjs7.5.9package.json
npmstatic-params0.4.0package.json
npmxml-flow1.0.4package.json
All dependencies 202

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 194 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@joplin/turndown-plugin-gfm1.0.62direct
npm@notionhq/client5.20.0direct
npm@zip.js/zip.js2.7.60direct
npmmathml-to-latex1.5.0direct
npmplain-tag0.1.3direct
npmprotobufjs7.5.9direct
npmstatic-params0.4.0direct
npmxml-flow1.0.4direct
npm@codemirror/state6.5.0indirect
npm@codemirror/view6.38.6indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.4indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.21.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.4.2indirect
npm@eslint/core0.17.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.3.5indirect
npm@eslint/js9.39.4indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema2.1.7indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.4.1indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@marijn/find-cluster-break1.0.2indirect
npm@microsoft/microsoft-graph-types2.38.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/aspromise1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/base641.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/codegen2.0.5indirect
npm@protobufjs/eventemitter1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/fetch1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/float1.0.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/inquire1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/path1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/pool1.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/utf81.1.1indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin5.10.0indirect
npm@types/codemirror5.60.8indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node20.19.27indirect
npm@types/tern0.23.9indirect
npm@types/xml-flow1.0.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.60.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.60.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.59.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.59.3indirect
npm@xmldom/xmldom0.8.13indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.15indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcrelt1.0.6indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmesbuild0.25.4indirect
npmesbuild0.28.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint9.39.4indirect
npmeslint-scope8.4.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.1indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree10.4.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals14.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlong5.3.2indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmmoment2.29.4indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmobsidian1.12.3indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmsax1.6.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmstyle-mod4.1.3indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.16indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtslib2.4.0indirect
npmtsx4.22.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.59.3indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmw3c-keyname2.2.8indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.