Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 00:30 UTC

ocean-uhh / seasenselib

A library for reading, converting, and plotting data from different oceanographic sensor formats.

PythonMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Dec 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#oceanography#adcp#rbr#seabird#aquadopp#cf-conventions#marine-data#marine-science#netcdf#microcat#ocean#ocean-sciences#ctd#moorings#acdd#nortek#rdi#seasenselib

ocean-uhh/seasenselib holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated 29 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Experimental Oceanography, UHHOrganization
5 followers14 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIseasenselib0.6.1-637 days agoctdoceanographycnvseabirdrbraquadoppmicrocatsensorsmooringsdatanetcdfcfconventionstoolsplottingadcp

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 29 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 260 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year260
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push29
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 37 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~-1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv0.6.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release37
mean_days_between_releases-1.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.845

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
38.4/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 67/73 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs67
open_issues6
closed_issues65
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.915
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of ocean-uhh
16/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginocean-uhh
public_repos14
account_age_days1,354

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 37 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesseasenselib
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish37

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ocean-uhh.github.io/seasenselib/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsoceanography, adcp, rbr, seabird, aquadopp, cf-conventions, marine-data, marine-science, netcdf, microcat, ocean, ocean-sciences, ctd, moorings, acdd, nortek, rdi, seasenselib
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ocean-uhh.github.io/seasenselib/
docs_sitehttps://ocean-uhh.github.io/seasenselib/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

53Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages73
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:seasenselib@0.6.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 73 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 87 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.956
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 19 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesPipfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.19
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 2/198 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes100,914
source_files_sampled198
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
4contributors
260commits, last 12 months
29days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
6open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'seasenselib' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712024-122025-092026-07
Major 0Minor 4Patch 1

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 00:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 4/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpycnv—pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas—pyproject.toml
PyPIxarray—pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy—pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy—pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib—pyproject.toml
PyPInetcdf4—pyproject.toml
PyPIpint—pyproject.toml
PyPIgsw—pyproject.toml
PyPImhkit>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyrsktools—pyproject.toml
PyPIseabirdscientific>=1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsetuptools—pyproject.toml
PyPIimportlib-metadata>=1.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 130

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 104 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIgsw—direct
PyPIgsw3.6.23direct
PyPIimportlib-metadata—direct
PyPImatplotlib—direct
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1direct
PyPImhkit—direct
PyPImhkit1.1.2direct
PyPInetcdf4—direct
PyPInetcdf41.7.4direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPInumpy2.5.2direct
PyPIpandas—direct
PyPIpandas3.0.5direct
PyPIpint—direct
PyPIpint0.25.3direct
PyPIpycnv—direct
PyPIpycnv0.5.0direct
PyPIpyrsktools—direct
PyPIpyrsktools1.3.0direct
PyPIscipy—direct
PyPIscipy1.18.0direct
PyPIseabirdscientific—direct
PyPIsetuptools—direct
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0direct
PyPIxarray—direct
PyPIxarray2026.7.0direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbleach6.4.0indirect
PyPIbuild—indirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIcartopy0.25.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcftime1.6.5indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.0indirect
PyPIcmocean4.0.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.22.1indirect
PyPIflexcache0.3indirect
PyPIflexparser0.4indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIh5py3.16.0indirect
PyPIh5pyd0.24.0indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter—indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune3.3.4indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser—indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.11.0indirect
PyPInbconvert—indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.1indirect
PyPInbformat5.11.0indirect
PyPInbsphinx—indirect
PyPInbsphinx0.9.8indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIpecos1.0.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.2indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpyaml26.7.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyproj3.7.2indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpyshp3.1.6indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytz2026.3.post1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrequests-unixsocket0.4.1indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIseasenselib—indirect
PyPIshapely2.1.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.2indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme—indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItornado6.5.8indirect
PyPItraitlets5.16.1indirect
PyPItwine—indirect
PyPItwine7.0.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:seasenselib@0.6.1 pulls in 73 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ocean-uhh/seasenselib. Read them side by side →

90Unidata/netcdf4-pythonnetcdf4-python: python/numpy interface to the netCDF C libraryExcellent86wavespectra/wavespectraLibrary for ocean wave spectraExcellent98plotly/plotly.jsOpen-source JavaScript charting library behind Plotly and DashExceptional96electric-sql/electricThe agent platform built on sync.Exceptional87plotly/react-plotly.jsA plotly.js React component from Plotly 📈 Excellent100run-llama/llama_indexLlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AIExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.