Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 23:50 UTC

octobercms / october

Self-hosted CMS platform based on the Laravel PHP Framework.

PHP · JavaScriptCustom license★ 11,148 stars⑂ 2,203 forkssince Nov 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

octobercms/october holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (46/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

October CMSOrganization · verified domain
180 followers12 public repossince Sep 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmoctobercmspoints to another repo — not scored1.3.2110141158 days agooctobercmsoctoberajaxframework
Packagistoctober/octoberv4.3.82,5322902 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume244 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year244
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year46
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases15 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 39 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~142.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv4.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases142.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars11,148 stars
25/25Forks2,203 forks
14.5/15Watchers401 watchers
Inputs used
forks2,203
stars11,148
watchers401
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.4/80Monthly downloads2,532 downloads/month across packagist
4/20Registry dependents3 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesoctober/october
dependents3
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads267,962
monthly_downloads2,532
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 36 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.803
How it's scored
41.8/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
18.4/30PR acceptance1,437/2,345 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 7/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs1,437
open_issues15
closed_issues3,646
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.996
closed_unmerged_prs908
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.2/25Owner reach180 followers of octobercms
20.1/25Track record12 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers180
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginoctobercms
public_repos12
account_age_days4,717

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history290 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesoctober/october
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://octobercms.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscms, framework, cmf, laravel, php, platform, octobercms, backend, cms-platform
has_wikino
homepagehttps://octobercms.com
docs_sitehttps://octobercms.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 7/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 36 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.9/40Legible commit history28 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.28
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapmodules/backend/assets/foundation/migrate/vendor/flot/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmodules/backend/assets/foundation/migrate/vendor/flot/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes10/2,002 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes1,524,654
source_files_sampled2,002
oversized_source_files10
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplessample
Inputs used
example_dirssample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

11,148GitHub stars
100contributors
244commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
15open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package 'octobercms' points at a different repository (https://github.com/octobercms/ajax); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,203 ⇿
0Stars
2,203Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

1,0001,2501,5001,7502,0002,2502,203142018-012022-052026-08
Major 3Minor 12Patch 0

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 23:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 7/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 36 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistoctober/rain^4.3composer.json
Packagistlaravel/framework^12.0composer.json
npm@phosphor-icons/web^2.1.2package.json
npm@popperjs/core^2.11.7package.json
npmbluebird^3.7.2package.json
npmbootstrap^5.3.3package.json
npmbootstrap-icons^1.10package.json
npmchart.js^4.3.2package.json
npmchartjs-adapter-moment^1.0.1package.json
npmdropzone^6.0.0-beta.2package.json
npmemmet-monaco-es^5.3package.json
npmjquery^3.6.0package.json
npmjs-cookie^3.0.1package.json
npmmoment^2.30.1package.json
npmmoment-timezone^0.5.46package.json
npmmonaco-editor^0.46.0package.json
npmmonaco-yaml^5.1.1package.json
npmpopper.js^1.16.1package.json
npmsortablejs^1.15.0package.json
npmvue^2.6.14package.json
npmvue-router^3.5.3package.json
All dependencies 48

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 23 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@phosphor-icons/web^2.1.2direct
npm@popperjs/core^2.11.7direct
npmbluebird^3.7.2direct
npmbootstrap^5.3.0direct
npmbootstrap^5.3.3direct
npmbootstrap-icons^1.10direct
npmbootstrap-icons^1.11.3direct
npmchart.js^4.3.2direct
npmchartjs-adapter-moment^1.0.1direct
npmdropzone^6.0.0-beta.2direct
npmemmet-monaco-es^5.3direct
npmjquery^3.6.0direct
npmjs-cookie^3.0.1direct
npmmoment^2.30.1direct
npmmoment-timezone^0.5.46direct
npmmonaco-editor^0.46.0direct
npmmonaco-yaml^5.1.1direct
npmpopper.js^1.16.1direct
npmsortablejs^1.15.0direct
npmvue^2.6.14direct
npmvue^3.5.0direct
npmvue-router^3.5.3direct
npmvue-router^4.5.0direct
Packagistlaravel/frameworkdirect
Packagistoctober/raindirect
npm@trevoreyre/autocomplete-vue^3.0.3indirect
npmbabel-plugin-module-resolver^4.1.0indirect
npmcodemirror^5.64.0indirect
npmesbuild^0.24.0indirect
npmesbuild^0.28.2indirect
npmlaravel-mix^6.0.39indirect
npmless^4.1.2indirect
npmless^4.2.0indirect
npmless-loader^10.2.0indirect
npmmitt^3.0.1indirect
npmmustache^4.2.0indirect
npmp-queue^8.0.1indirect
npmphotoswipe^5.2.4indirect
npmphotoswipe-dynamic-caption-plugin^1.1.1indirect
npmsass^1.45.0indirect
npmsass^1.83.0indirect
npmsass-loader^12.1.0indirect
npmslick-carousel^1.8.1indirect
npmvue-multiselect^3.1.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/installersindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesnifferindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm, Packagist.