Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 09:49 UTC

octokit / openapi-webhooks

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

octokit/openapi-webhooks holds a health index of 51 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (71/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (28/100). It was last updated 120 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

51
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

51
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OctokitOrganization
1,240 followers71 public repossince Jan 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks12.1.098535243 days agogithubopenapioctokitwebhooks
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types12.1.017,299,53135243 days ago
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghec12.1.032335243 days ago
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.1312.1.017919243 days ago
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.1412.1.017819243 days ago
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.1512.1.016314243 days ago
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.1612.1.01047243 days ago
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.1712.1.0701243 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

37Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 120 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume2 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share0.92
days_since_last_push120
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases78 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 243 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~31.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count78
latest_release_tagv12.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release243
mean_days_between_releases31.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars5
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads17,301,533 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@octokit/openapi-webhooks, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghec, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.13, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.14, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.15, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.16, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.17
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads17,301,533
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 85% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.848
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
24.2/30PR acceptance92/114 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs92
open_issues0
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs22
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
22.2/25Owner reach1,240 followers of octokit
25/25Track record71 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,240
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginoctokit
public_repos71
account_age_days4,933
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on npm
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 243 days ago
20/20Version history35 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@octokit/openapi-webhooks, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghec, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.13, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.14, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.15, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.16, @octokit/openapi-webhooks-types-ghes-3.17
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish243

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

28At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

30At Risk
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.2/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
3.5/5SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories30
affected_packages9
assessed_packages117
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severityhigh 6, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 117 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.7/40Legible commit history65 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.707
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingTypeScript (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
28.9/55Manageable file sizes9/19 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes2,803,944
source_files_sampled19
oversized_source_files9

Key facts

5GitHub stars
4contributors
2commits, last 12 months
120days since last push
78releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312024-042024-112025-07
Major 5Minor 11Patch 10

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 09:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1CI-Tests2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 8/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types^0.0.0-developmentpackages/openapi-webhooks-types-transition/package.json
All dependencies 118

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 117 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@octokit/openapi-webhooks-types^0.0.0-developmentdirect
npm@fastify/busboy2.1.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token5.1.2indirect
npm@octokit/core6.1.3indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint10.1.2indirect
npm@octokit/graphql8.2.0indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types23.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/request9.2.0indirect
npm@octokit/request-error6.1.6indirect
npm@octokit/types13.8.0indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-buffer-byte-length1.0.2indirect
npmavailable-typed-arrays1.0.7indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbefore-after-hook3.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcall-bind1.0.8indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.1indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.3indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdeep-equal2.2.3indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.4indirect
npmdefine-properties1.2.1indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-get-iterator1.1.3indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmfast-content-type-parse2.0.1indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastq1.19.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfor-each0.3.4indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmfunctions-have-names1.2.3indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.2.7indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgithub-enterprise-server-versions2.0.1indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-bigints1.1.0indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.2indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npminternal-slot1.1.0indirect
npmis-arguments1.2.0indirect
npmis-array-buffer3.0.5indirect
npmis-bigint1.1.0indirect
npmis-boolean-object1.2.2indirect
npmis-callable1.2.7indirect
npmis-date-object1.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-map2.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-number-object1.1.1indirect
npmis-regex1.2.1indirect
npmis-set2.0.3indirect
npmis-shared-array-buffer1.0.4indirect
npmis-string1.1.1indirect
npmis-symbol1.1.1indirect
npmis-weakmap2.0.2indirect
npmis-weakset2.0.4indirect
npmisarray2.0.5indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.1indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmobject-is1.1.6indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmobject.assign4.1.7indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmopenapi-typescript6.7.6indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpossible-typed-array-names1.1.0indirect
npmprettier3.4.2indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmregexp.prototype.flags1.5.4indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsafe-regex-test1.1.0indirect
npmsemantic-release-plugin-update-version-in-files1.1.0indirect
npmset-function-length1.2.2indirect
npmset-function-name2.0.2indirect
npmside-channel1.1.0indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.0indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmstop-iteration-iterator1.1.0indirect
npmsupports-color9.4.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmundici5.29.0indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.2indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwhich-boxed-primitive1.1.1indirect
npmwhich-collection1.0.2indirect
npmwhich-typed-array1.1.18indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 117 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
js-yaml4.1.1indirecthigh24.3.0
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
undici5.29.0indirecthigh128.9.0
@octokit/endpoint10.1.2indirectmoderate110.1.3
@octokit/request9.2.0indirectmoderate19.2.1
@octokit/request-error6.1.6indirectmoderate16.1.7

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.