Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 18:44 UTC

octopus-energy / tentaclio

Single repository regrouping IO connectors used in the data world.

PythonMIT★ 31 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Jan 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

octopus-energy/tentaclio holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Security (56/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Octopus EnergyOrganization
165 followers44 public repossince Sep 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPItentaclio1.6.0927,907440 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18Commit volume — 68 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year68
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 17 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~50.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tag1.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases50.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
24/60Stars — 31 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
10.8/15Watchers — 88 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars31
watchers88
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescircleci.com, readthedocs.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
79.6/80Monthly downloads — 927,907 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestentaclio
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads927,907
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.461
How it's scored
26.2/42Issue resolution — 62% of issues closed
22.1/30PR acceptance — 180/244 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs180
open_issues3
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.625
closed_unmerged_prs64
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16/25Owner reach — 165 followers of octopus-energy
24/25Track record — 44 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers165
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginoctopus-energy
public_repos44
account_age_days2,235

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 44 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestentaclio
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.flake8], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://tentaclio.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython3, data-science, protocols, database-connections, data
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://tentaclio.readthedocs.io
docs_sitehttps://tentaclio.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
12.9/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: urllib3 2.7.0 (high 7.5), paramiko 3.5.1 (low 3.4)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
36.9/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 168 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories12
affected_packages4
assessed_packages157
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 157 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.6/40Legible commit history — 43 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.443
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,847
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.flake8], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — src/tentaclio/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/tentaclio/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/tentaclio/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/78 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes10,763
source_files_sampled78
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

31GitHub stars
28contributors
68commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
17releases
2bus factor
3open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:tentaclio@1.6.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512020-052023-082026-10
Major 0Minor 4Patch 12

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 18:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests6 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIurllib3>=1.24.2pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests—pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=1.4,<2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIparamiko>=3.4.0,<4.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas—pyproject.toml
PyPIclick—pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml—pyproject.toml
All dependencies 157

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 145 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIclick8.5.0direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIpandas3.0.5direct
PyPIpandas3.0.6direct
PyPIparamiko3.5.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.55direct
PyPIurllib32.7.0direct
PyPIurllib32.8.0direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIasn1crypto1.5.1indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.13.1indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0indirect
PyPIblack26.10.1indirect
PyPIboto31.43.115indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.115indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.10.19indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.2indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.2indirect
PyPIdatabricks-sql-connector4.7.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.7indirect
PyPIflake87.4.1indirect
PyPIflake8-pyproject1.2.4indirect
PyPIfuture1.0.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.42.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-python-client2.201.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.62.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth-httplib20.4.4indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth-oauthlib1.5.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-core2.8.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage3.17.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-crc32c1.9.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-resumable-media2.11.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.5indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.4indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.6indirect
PyPIhttplib20.32.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIidna3.20indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.1indirect
PyPIisort9.0.2indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.16.0indirect
PyPIlz44.4.5indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.4indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImoto5.2.4indirect
PyPImypy2.4.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser4.0.1indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.4indirect
PyPIoauthlib4.0.0indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.45.1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpkginfo1.13.3indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.13.5indirect
PyPIpluggy1.7.0indirect
PyPIpolars2.0.0indirect
PyPIpolars-runtime-322.0.0indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.29.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.36.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.13indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpyathena1.10.7indirect
PyPIpybreaker1.4.1indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.15.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.11indirect
PyPIpydocstyle6.3.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes4.0.3indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.1indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpyopenssl26.4.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.3indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.17.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz2026.3.post1indirect
PyPIpytz2026.5indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIresponses0.26.3indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.3indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsnowflake-connector-python4.8.0indirect
PyPIsnowflake-sqlalchemy1.11.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.2.1indirect
PyPItentaclio-athena0.0.1indirect
PyPItentaclio-databricks1.0.2indirect
PyPItentaclio-gdrive0.0.3indirect
PyPItentaclio-gs0.0.1indirect
PyPItentaclio-postgres0.1.0indirect
PyPItentaclio-s30.0.5indirect
PyPItentaclio-snowflake0.0.3indirect
PyPIthrift0.25.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli2.5.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.2indirect
PyPItypes-paramiko3.3.0.2indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260906indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20261006indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPItzdata2026.5indirect
PyPIuritemplate4.2.0indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.9indirect
PyPIxmltodict1.0.4indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 157 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
urllib32.7.0directhigh62.8.0
certifi2026.7.22indirecthigh22026.10.19
cryptography49.0.0indirectmoderate250.0.0
paramiko3.5.1directlow2—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.