Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:24 UTC

odiseoteam / SyliusVendorPlugin

This is a Sylius Plugin that add vendors (brands) to your store. The vendors is an entity that sells products and are fully customizable by the admin.

PHPMIT★ 62 stars⑂ 27 forkssince Nov 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginhow this is determined

odiseoteam/SyliusVendorPlugin holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (94/100) and lowest on Security (50/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OdiseoOrganization
8 followers43 public repossince Mar 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistodiseoteam/sylius-vendor-pluginv2.2.05177414 days agosyliusmarketplacesylius-pluginsylius-vendorsylius-brand

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 14 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
12.7/18Commit volume — 25 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year25
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 74 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 14 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~95.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count74
latest_release_tagv2.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases95.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29/60Stars — 62 stars
11.8/25Forks — 27 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks27
stars62
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
36.2/80Monthly downloads — 517 downloads/month across packagist
2/20Registry dependents — 1 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesodiseoteam/sylius-vendor-plugin
dependents1
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads69,022
monthly_downloads517

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.907
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 18/18 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs18
open_issues1
closed_issues17
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.944
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.9/25Owner reach — 8 followers of odiseoteam
24/25Track record — 43 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginodiseoteam
public_repos43
account_age_days4,154

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 74 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesodiseoteam/sylius-vendor-plugin
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

94Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://odiseo.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, symfony, sylius-plugin, plugin, ecommerce, vendors, brand
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://odiseo.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.8/40Legible commit history — 20 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.202
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,076
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/97 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes5,801
source_files_sampled97
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

62GitHub stars
6contributors
25commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
74releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 27 ⇿
0Stars
27Forks
66Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302722017-122021-112025-11
Major 1Minor 8Patch 57

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistsylius/sylius^2.0composer.json
All dependencies 33

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 32 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistsylius/syliusdirect
Packagistbehat/behatindirect
Packagistdbrekelmans/bdiindirect
Packagistdmore/behat-chrome-extensionindirect
Packagistdmore/chrome-mink-driverindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/minkindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-browserkit-driverindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-debug-extensionindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/mink-extensionindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/page-object-extensionindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/suite-settings-extensionindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/symfony-extensionindirect
Packagistfriends-of-behat/variadic-extensionindirect
Packagistnyholm/psr7indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-doctrineindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-webmozart-assertindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistrobertfausk/behat-panther-extensionindirect
Packagiststefandoorn/sitemap-pluginindirect
Packagistsylius-labs/coding-standardindirect
Packagistsylius-labs/suite-tags-extensionindirect
Packagistsylius/sylius-rectorindirect
Packagistsylius/test-applicationindirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kitindirect
Packagistsymfony/debug-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/dotenvindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-clientindirect
Packagistsymfony/intlindirect
Packagistsymfony/runtimeindirect
Packagistsymfony/web-profiler-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/webpack-encore-bundleindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.