Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 04:35 UTC

oomph-ac / oomph

The best Minecraft Bedrock AntiCheat: an MiTM proxy built to stop cheaters in their tracks.

GoCustom license★ 90 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Jan 2022View on GitHub ↗
#anti-cheat#anticheat#bedrock-edition#go#golang#mcbe#mcpe#minecraft#minecraft-bedrock#minecraft-bedrock-edition

oomph-ac/oomph holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Oomph ACOrganization
7 followers20 public repossince Feb 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

89Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 202 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year202
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year36

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

46Weak
How it's scored
31.6/60Stars — 90 stars
10.7/25Forks — 20 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks20
stars90
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

39Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 70% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 19 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled19
top_contributor_share0.703

Issue & PR responsiveness

64Moderate
How it's scored
31.7/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
24.2/30PR acceptance — 71/88 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs71
open_issues14
closed_issues43
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.754
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of oomph-ac
18.4/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginoomph-ac
public_repos20
account_age_days1,603
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://oomph.ac
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsanti-cheat, anticheat, bedrock-edition, go, golang, mcbe, mcpe, minecraft, minecraft-bedrock, minecraft-bedrock-edition
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://oomph.ac
docs_sitehttps://oomph.ac
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/151 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes36,926
source_files_sampled151
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

90GitHub stars
19contributors
202commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
14open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/oomph-ac/oomph' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 04:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/chewxy/math32v1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/df-mc/dragonflyv0.10.14-0.20260508142332-b4a4d55303f9go.mod
Gogithub.com/ethaniccc/float32-cubev0.0.0-20250511224129-7af1f8c4ee12go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-gl/mathglv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hjson/hjson-go/v4v4.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/oomph-ac/oomph/deps/proxyv0.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/sandertv/go-raknetv1.15.1-0.20260112202637-beca0b10c217go.mod
Gogithub.com/sandertv/gophertunnelv1.57.2-0.20260714084219-654cd5f0bcb4go.mod
Gogithub.com/zeebo/xxh3v1.1.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260218203240-3dfff04db8fago.mod
All dependencies 51

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 42 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/chewxy/math32v1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/ethaniccc/float32-cubev0.0.0-20250511224129-7af1f8c4ee12direct
Gogithub.com/go-gl/mathglv1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/hjson/hjson-go/v4v4.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/oomph-ac/oomph/deps/proxyv0.1.2direct
Gogithub.com/sandertv/go-raknetv1.15.1-0.20260112202637-beca0b10c217direct
Gogithub.com/sandertv/gophertunnelv1.57.2-0.20260714084219-654cd5f0bcb4direct
Gogithub.com/zeebo/xxh3v1.1.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260218203240-3dfff04db8fadirect
Gogithub.com/brentp/intintmapv0.0.0-20251106190759-56907b1f8479indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3v3.17.0indirect
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-nethernetv1.0.17indirect
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-playfabv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/df-mc/go-xsapiv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/df-mc/goleveldbv1.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/df-mc/jsoncv1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/df-mc/worldupgraderv1.0.21indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/snappyv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.4indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nxadm/tailv1.4.11indirect
Gogithub.com/nxadm/tailv1.4.8indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/datachannelv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/dtls/v3v3.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/ice/v4v4.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/interceptorv0.1.44indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/loggingv0.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/mdns/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/randutilv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/rtcpv1.2.16indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/rtpv1.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/sctpv1.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/sdp/v3v3.0.18indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/srtp/v3v3.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/stun/v3v3.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/transport/v4v4.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/turn/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/webrtc/v4v4.2.10-0.20260224155637-aa3b95c72dd2indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/fasthashv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/wlynxg/anetv0.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.48.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.33.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.51.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.34.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.10.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with oomph-ac/oomph. Read them side by side →

100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional100openfga/openfgaA high performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google ZanzibarExceptional100moby/mobyThe Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systemsExceptional99docker/composeDefine and run multi-container applications with DockerExceptional99gofiber/fiber⚡️ Express inspired web framework written in GoExceptional99go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.