Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 12:26 UTC

open-formulieren / types

Type declarations for Open Formulieren

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 1 forksince May 2023View on GitHub ↗

open-formulieren/types holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (25/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Open FormulierenOrganization
15 followers20 public repossince Apr 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@open-formulieren/types1.6.05,0017040 days agoopen-formsopen-formulierenformiotypescript

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 118 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year118
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year23
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 70 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 40 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~19.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count70
latest_release_tag1.6.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release40
mean_days_between_releases19.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

25At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars1
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.3/80Monthly downloads — 5,001 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@open-formulieren/types
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,001
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 69% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.688
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.1/30PR acceptance — 92/95 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs92
open_issues0
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.7/25Owner reach — 15 followers of open-formulieren
20.6/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginopen-formulieren
public_repos20
account_age_days2,002

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20Version history — 70 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@open-formulieren/types
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://open-formulieren.github.io/types/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://open-formulieren.github.io/types/
docs_sitehttps://open-formulieren.github.io/types/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
6/7.5Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
3/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages3
assessed_packages162
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 162 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 75 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.75
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/72 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes7,719
source_files_sampled72
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
8contributors
118commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
70releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 12:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 7/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
8Maintained9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
6SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 162

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 162 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/generator7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/helper-globals7.28.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/template7.27.2indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/types7.28.5indirect
npm@gerrit0/mini-shiki3.23.0indirect
npm@jest/schemas29.4.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@sinclair/typebox0.25.24indirect
npm@trivago/prettier-plugin-sort-imports6.0.2indirect
npm@tsd/typescript5.9.3indirect
npm@types/eslint7.29.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.1indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.11indirect
npm@types/minimist1.2.2indirect
npm@types/normalize-package-data2.4.1indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npmansi-escapes4.3.2indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles5.2.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmarrify1.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcamelcase5.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase-keys6.2.2indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecamelize1.2.0indirect
npmdecamelize-keys1.1.1indirect
npmdiff-sequences29.4.3indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.2indirect
npmeslint-formatter-pretty4.1.0indirect
npmeslint-rule-docs1.1.235indirect
npmfast-glob3.2.12indirect
npmfastq1.15.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmhard-rejection2.1.0indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhosted-git-info2.8.9indirect
npmhosted-git-info4.1.0indirect
npmignore5.2.4indirect
npmindent-string4.0.0indirect
npmirregular-plurals3.5.0indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-core-module2.12.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj1.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmjavascript-natural-sort0.7.1indirect
npmjest-diff29.5.0indirect
npmjest-get-type29.4.3indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjsesc3.1.0indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmlodash-es4.18.1indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmlru-cache6.0.0indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmap-obj1.0.1indirect
npmmap-obj4.3.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.1indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmmeow9.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmin-indent1.0.1indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminimist-options4.1.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnormalize-package-data2.5.0indirect
npmnormalize-package-data3.0.3indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmparse-imports-exports0.2.4indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmparse-statements1.0.11indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmplur4.0.0indirect
npmprettier3.8.3indirect
npmpretty-format29.5.0indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmquick-lru4.0.1indirect
npmreact-is18.2.0indirect
npmread-pkg5.2.0indirect
npmread-pkg-up7.0.1indirect
npmredent3.0.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.2indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver5.7.2indirect
npmsemver7.5.4indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmspdx-correct3.2.0indirect
npmspdx-exceptions2.3.0indirect
npmspdx-expression-parse3.0.1indirect
npmspdx-license-ids3.0.13indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-indent3.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-hyperlinks2.3.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtrim-newlines3.0.1indirect
npmtsd0.33.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.18.1indirect
npmtype-fest0.21.3indirect
npmtype-fest0.6.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.8.1indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.19indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmvalidate-npm-package-license3.0.4indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
npmyaml2.8.3indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.9indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 162 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion2.1.4indirecthigh35.0.12
brace-expansion5.0.9indirecthigh35.0.12
braces3.0.3indirecthigh1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.