Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:04 UTC

open-policy-agent / java-opa-sdk

Java package for evaluating OPA IR Plans compiled from Rego policies

JavaApache-2.0★ 19 stars⑂ 24 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

open-policy-agent/java-opa-sdk holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Open Policy AgentOrganization
857 followers46 public repossince Dec 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 164 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year164
human_commit_share0.63
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year22
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~29.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv0.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases29.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.4/60Stars — 19 stars
11.3/25Forks — 24 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks24
stars19
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 63% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.626
How it's scored
21.6/42Issue resolution — 51% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance — 155/168 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs155
open_issues36
closed_issues38
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.514
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.1/25Owner reach — 857 followers of open-policy-agent
24.2/25Track record — 46 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers857
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginopen-policy-agent
public_repos46
account_age_days3,947

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

80Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages9
assessed_packages150
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4, moderate 4, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 150 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

92Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://www.openpolicyagent.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 62 of 63 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://www.openpolicyagent.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.984
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,517
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — build.gradle.kts, cli/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 37 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestsbuild.gradle.kts, cli/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-crypto/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-json/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-net/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-providers-aws/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-regex/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-semver/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-time/build.gradle.kts, opa-builtins/opa-builtins-token/build.gradle.kts, opa-evaluator/build.gradle.kts, opa-gson/build.gradle.kts, opa-jackson/build.gradle.kts, opa-proto/build.gradle.kts, opa-services/build.gradle.kts, opa-slf4j/build.gradle.kts, tools/generate-compliance-tests/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.37
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/319 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes64,117
source_files_sampled319
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — opa-proto/src/main/proto/v1/bundle/manifest.proto, opa-proto/src/main/proto/v1/ir/plan.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesopa-proto/src/main/proto/v1/bundle/manifest.proto, opa-proto/src/main/proto/v1/ir/plan.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

19GitHub stars
17contributors
164commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
36open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 24 ⇿
0Stars
24Forks
3Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242432026-052026-072026-09
Major 0Minor 3Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 10:04 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 5/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opav1.21.1tools/generate-compliance-tests/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12tools/generate-compliance-tests/go.mod
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 148 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/open-policy-agent/opav1.21.1direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12direct
Gogithub.com/agnivade/levenshteinv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dgraph-io/ristretto/v2v2.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/globv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6indirect
Gogithub.com/google/flatbuffersv25.12.19+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagicv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsigv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/dsig-secp256k1v1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httpccv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httprc/v3v3.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v3v3.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/option/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metricsv0.0.0-20250401214520-65e299d6c5c9indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/tchap/go-patricia/v2v2.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjsonv1.6.10indirect
Gogithub.com/vektah/gqlparser/v2v2.5.37indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointerv0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreferencev0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Gogithub.com/yashtewari/glob-intersectionv0.2.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.48.0indirect
Mavenbiz.aQute.bnd:biz.aQute.bnd.annotation7.1.0indirect
Mavencom.ethlo.time:itu1.14.0indirect
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations2.21indirect
Mavencom.github.oowekyala.ooxml:nice-xml-messages3.1indirect
Mavencom.github.seancfoley:ipaddress5.6.2indirect
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2indirect
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.13.1indirect
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.14.0indirect
Mavencom.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations2.36.0indirect
Mavencom.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations2.38.0indirect
Mavencom.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations2.48.0indirect
Mavencom.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin1.7.3indirect
Mavencom.google.guava:failureaccess1.0.2indirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava33.4.0-jreindirect
Mavencom.google.guava:listenablefuture9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guavaindirect
Mavencom.google.j2objc:j2objc-annotations3.0.0indirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-gradle-plugin0.10.0indirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java4.36.2indirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protoc4.36.2indirect
Mavencom.networknt:json-schema-validator3.0.5indirect
Mavencom.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt10.10indirect
Mavencom.puppycrawl.tools:checkstyle10.21.4indirect
Mavencom.squareup.moshi:moshi1.15.2indirect
Mavencom.squareup.moshi:moshi-kotlin1.15.2indirect
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp5.1.0indirect
Mavencom.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp-jvm5.1.0indirect
Mavencom.squareup.okio:okio3.15.0indirect
Mavencom.squareup.okio:okio-jvm3.15.0indirect
Mavencom.squareup.retrofit2:converter-moshi3.0.0indirect
Mavencom.squareup.retrofit2:converter-scalars3.0.0indirect
Mavencom.squareup.retrofit2:retrofit3.0.0indirect
Mavencom.vaadin.external.google:android-json0.0.20131108.vaadin1indirect
Mavencom.vanniktech:central-portal0.37.0indirect
Mavencom.vanniktech:gradle-maven-publish-plugin0.37.0indirect
Mavencommons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.10.1indirect
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.15indirect
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.19.0indirect
Mavencommons-collections:commons-collections3.2.2indirect
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.20.0indirect
Mavendk.brics.automaton:automaton1.11-8indirect
Maveninfo.picocli:picocli4.7.6indirect
Maveninfo.picocli:picocli4.7.7indirect
Mavenkr.motd.maven:os-maven-plugin1.7.1indirect
Mavennet.bytebuddy:byte-buddy1.18.3indirect
Mavennet.bytebuddy:byte-buddy-agent1.17.7indirect
Mavennet.sf.saxon:Saxon-HE12.5indirect
Mavennet.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-ant7.14.0indirect
Mavennet.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core7.14.0indirect
Mavennet.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-java7.14.0indirect
Mavenorg.antlr:antlr4-runtime4.13.2indirect
Mavenorg.antlr:antlr4-runtime4.9.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-compress1.28.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.17.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.18.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.8.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-text1.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents.client5:httpclient55.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore55.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5-h25.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient4.5.13indirect
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore4.4.14indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api2.26.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.26.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-slf4j2-impl2.26.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-core1.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-logging-api1.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-module-xdoc1.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-sink-api1.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.xbean:xbean-reflect3.7indirect
Mavenorg.apiguardian:apiguardian-api1.1.2indirect
Mavenorg.assertj:assertj-core3.27.7indirect
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on1.86indirect
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on1.86indirect
Mavenorg.bouncycastle:bcutil-jdk18on1.86indirect
Mavenorg.checkerframework:checker-qual3.48.4indirect
Mavenorg.checkerframework:checker-qual3.49.3indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-classworlds2.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-annotations2.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default2.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.gradle.toolchains:foojay-resolver1.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.gradle:gradle-core9.8.0indirect
Mavenorg.javassist:javassist3.28.0-GAindirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflect2.4.10indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib2.4.10indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk71.8.21indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk81.8.21indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains:annotations13.0indirect
Mavenorg.json:json20260814indirect
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-commons6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-engine6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-launcher6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom6.1.3indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core5.24.0indirect
Mavenorg.objenesis:objenesis3.3indirect
Mavenorg.opentest4j:opentest4j1.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.osgi:org.osgi.annotation.bundle2.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.osgi:org.osgi.annotation.versioning1.1.2indirect
Mavenorg.osgi:org.osgi.resource1.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.osgi:org.osgi.service.serviceloader1.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.ow2.asm:asm9.8indirect
Mavenorg.pcollections:pcollections4.0.2indirect
Mavenorg.reflections:reflections0.10.2indirect
Mavenorg.semver4j:semver4j6.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.skyscreamer:jsonassert1.5.3indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j1.7.36indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.17indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.18indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api2.0.20indirect
Mavenorg.snakeyaml:snakeyaml-engine3.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.xmlresolver:xmlresolver5.2.2indirect
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-core3.1.7indirect
Maventools.jackson.core:jackson-databind3.1.7indirect
Maventools.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml3.1.7indirect
Maventools.jackson:jackson-bom3.1.7indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 150 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils1.10.1indirecthigh12.0.0-M2
org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore55.1.3indirecthigh15.5-beta2
org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5-h25.1.3indirecthigh15.5-beta2
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.3.0indirecthigh14.0.3
net.sourceforge.pmd:pmd-core7.14.0indirectmoderate17.22.0
org.apache.commons:commons-lang33.17.0indirectmoderate13.18.0
org.apache.commons:commons-lang33.8.1indirectmoderate13.18.0
org.apache.httpcomponents.client5:httpclient55.1.3indirectmoderate15.6.3
golang.org/x/cryptov0.55.0indirectunknown30.56.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.