Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 16:03 UTC

open-sesam / sesam

A clever git secrets manager

GoGPL-3.0★ 8 stars⑂ 1 forksince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

open-sesam/sesam holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

open-sesamOrganization
1 follower1 public reposince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Goopensesam.org/sesamv0.1.1-647 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 260 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year260
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 3 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 47 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.3 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 3 out of the last 3 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv0.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release47
mean_days_between_releases6.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars8
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 83% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.83
How it's scored
34.3/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance — 34/39 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs34
open_issues9
closed_issues40
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.816
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of open-sesam
3.2/25Track record — 1 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginopen-sesam
public_repos1
account_age_days189

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 47 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesopensesam.org/sesam
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish47

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://opensesam.org/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgit, git-secrets, secrets, secrets-manager
has_wikino
homepagehttps://opensesam.org/
docs_sitehttps://opensesam.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 3 out of the last 3 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.56.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages65
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 65 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 92 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.929
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,462
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yml, mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yml, mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/113 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes46,999
source_files_sampled113
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8GitHub stars
4contributors
260commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
9open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 16:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases3 out of the last 3 releases have a total of 3 signed artifacts.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gofilippo.io/agev1.3.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/semver/v3v3.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/chzyer/readlinev1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofrs/flockv0.13.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hdevalence/ed25519consensusv0.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jedib0t/go-pretty/v6v6.8.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/multiformats/go-multihashv0.2.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/neilotoole/jsoncolorv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sahib/renameio/v2v2.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli-docs/v3v3.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v3v3.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/zalando/go-keyringv0.2.8go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.56.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0go.mod
Golukechampine.com/blake3v1.4.1go.mod
All dependencies 65

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 40 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gofilippo.io/agev1.3.2direct
Gogithub.com/chzyer/readlinev1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2direct
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2direct
Gogithub.com/gofrs/flockv0.13.1direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/hdevalence/ed25519consensusv0.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/jedib0t/go-pretty/v6v6.8.3direct
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15direct
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/multiformats/go-multihashv0.2.3direct
Gogithub.com/neilotoole/jsoncolorv0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/sahib/renameio/v2v2.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.3direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli-docs/v3v3.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v3v3.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/zalando/go-keyringv0.2.8direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.56.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0direct
Golukechampine.com/blake3v1.4.1direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2indirect
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.2.0indirect
Gofilippo.io/hpkev0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.5indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoinv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/danieljoos/wincredv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/gcfgv1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/godbus/dbus/v5v5.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/jbenet/go-contextv0.0.0-20150711004518-d14ea06fba99indirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.29indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/sha256-simdv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mr-tron/base58v1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/multiformats/go-varintv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pjbgf/sha1cdv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/skeema/knownhostsv1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/spaolacci/murmur3v1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/ssh-agentv0.3.3indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.49.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/warnings.v0v0.1.2indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 65 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.56.0directunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.