Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 15:48 UTC

openAIP / openaip-coordinate-parser

Parser that extracts coordinates from a variety of formatted lat/lon strings.

TypeScriptMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 1 forksince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗

openAIP/openaip-coordinate-parser holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

openAIPOrganization
73 followers13 public repossince Apr 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@openaip/coordinate-parser0.33.073,577535 days agogeospatialopenaipcoordinatesgeographicparserlongitudelatitudecoordinate-parser

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
17.2/18Commit volume81 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year81
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases64 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~30.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count64
latest_release_tagv0.33.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases30.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars5
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
64.9/80Monthly downloads73,577 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@openaip/coordinate-parser
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads73,577
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.995
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
10/30PR acceptance1/3 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
13.4/25Owner reach73 followers of openAIP
20.3/25Track record13 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers73
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginopenAIP
public_repos13
account_age_days4,123
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history53 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@openaip/coordinate-parser
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configbiome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages3
assessed_packages207
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 207 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.2/40Legible commit history36 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.36
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configbiome.json
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/52 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes32,992
source_files_sampled52
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

5GitHub stars
2contributors
81commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
64releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@openaip/coordinate-parser@0.33.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 15:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmzod^4.4.3package.json
All dependencies 207

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 206 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmzod4.4.3direct
npm@babel/code-frame7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/generator7.28.3indirect
npm@babel/helper-globals7.28.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/template7.27.2indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.28.4indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.0indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.5indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/minimatch3.0.5indirect
npm@types/node25.0.2indirect
npm@types/parse-json4.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.8indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.22indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.22indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.22indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.22indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.22indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmarray-differ3.0.0indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmarrify2.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.15indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcallsite1.0.0indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcosmiconfig7.1.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdepcheck1.4.7indirect
npmdeps-regex0.2.0indirect
npmdetect-file1.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.4indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpand-tilde2.0.2indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfindup-sync5.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglobal-modules1.0.0indirect
npmglobal-prefix1.0.2indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhomedir-polyfill1.0.3indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmini1.3.8indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-windows1.0.2indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml3.14.2indirect
npmjsesc3.1.0indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.2indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminimatch7.4.9indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmultimatch5.0.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmnpm-check-updates22.2.3indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmparse-passwd1.0.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmplease-upgrade-node3.2.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrequire-package-name2.0.1indirect
npmresolve1.22.10indirect
npmresolve-dir1.0.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmsemver7.7.3indirect
npmsemver-compare1.0.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici-types7.16.0indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvitest4.1.8indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyaml1.10.3indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.9indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 207 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion1.1.15indirecthigh15.0.7
brace-expansion2.1.1indirecthigh15.0.7
js-yaml3.14.2indirecthigh24.3.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.