Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 10:29 UTC

openclaw / clawhub

Skill + Plugin Registry for OpenClaw

TypeScriptMIT★ 9,425 stars⑂ 1,476 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

openclaw/clawhub holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (60/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

openclawOrganization

23,648 followers91 public repossince Jan 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	clawhub	0.23.3	257,751	30	42 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36	Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 2,679 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	2,679
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	37

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 42 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~6.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	16
latest_release_tag	v0.23.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	42
mean_days_between_releases	6.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

95Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 9,425 stars
25/25	Forks — 1,476 forks
10/15	Watchers — 63 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1,476
stars	9,425
watchers	63
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

90Excellent

How it's scored

72.1/80	Monthly downloads — 257,751 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	clawhub
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	257,751
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

64Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 96 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	96
top_contributor_share	0.297

Issue & PR responsiveness

63Moderate

How it's scored

40.7/42	Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
22/30	PR acceptance — 1,304/1,778 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	1,304
open_issues	56
closed_issues	1,791
prs_merged_7d	29
prs_decided_7d	33
prs_merged_30d	45
prs_decided_30d	50
issue_closed_ratio	0.97
closed_unmerged_prs	474
first_time_authors_30d	3
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	3

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 23,648 followers of openclaw
14.4/25	Track record — 91 public repos, account ~0 yr old

Inputs used

followers	23,648
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	openclaw
public_repos	91
account_age_days	254

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 42 days ago
20/20	Version history — 30 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	clawhub
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	42

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 33 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://clawhub.ai
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	directory, skill
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://clawhub.ai
docs_site	https://clawhub.ai
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
2/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — no data

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases, Vulnerabilities. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	46
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:clawhub@0.23.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 46 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .agents/skills/autoreview/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/autoreview/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://clawhub.ai/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 98 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://clawhub.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	.agents/skills/autoreview/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/autoreview/CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	7,345

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — convex/tsconfig.json, packages/clawhub-admin/tsconfig.json, packages/clawhub/tsconfig.json, packages/schema/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10	Reproducible environment
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	—
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	convex/tsconfig.json, packages/clawhub-admin/tsconfig.json, packages/clawhub/tsconfig.json, packages/schema/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
52.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 52/1,303 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	667,943
source_files_sampled	1,303
oversized_source_files	52

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — public/api/v1/openapi.json
0/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	public/api/v1/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

9,425GitHub stars

96contributors

2,679commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

16releases

2bus factor

56open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,476 ⇿

0Stars

1,476Forks

15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 8Patch 6

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10

5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 10:28 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
0	Dangerous-Workflow	dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
3	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
9	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
4	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
n/a	Vulnerabilities	internal error: vulnerabilitiesClient.ListUnfixedVulnerabilities: osvscanner.DoScan: client error: status="400 Bad Request" body={"code":3,"message":"error in query at index 140: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = invalid hash"}

Direct dependencies 94

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@auth/core	`0.41.3`	package.json
npm	@convex-dev/auth	`0.0.95`	package.json
npm	@convex-dev/migrations	`0.3.6`	package.json
npm	@convex-dev/rate-limiter	`0.3.2`	package.json
npm	@fontsource/bricolage-grotesque	`5.3.0`	package.json
npm	@fontsource/ibm-plex-mono	`5.3.0`	package.json
npm	@fontsource/noto-sans-sc	`5.3.0`	package.json
npm	@monaco-editor/react	`4.7.0`	package.json
npm	@openclaw/carapace	`git+https://github.com/openclaw/carapace.git#v0.6.1`	package.json
npm	@openclaw/krillswitch-react	`0.0.1`	package.json
npm	@openclaw/plugin-inspector	`0.3.23`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-avatar	`1.2.6`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-dialog	`1.1.23`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu	`2.1.24`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-label	`2.1.15`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-popover	`1.1.23`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-select	`2.3.7`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-separator	`1.1.15`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-slot	`1.3.3`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-toggle-group	`1.1.19`	package.json
npm	@radix-ui/react-tooltip	`1.2.16`	package.json
npm	@react-email/components	`^1.0.12`	package.json
npm	@react-email/render	`^2.1.0`	package.json
npm	@resvg/resvg-wasm	`2.6.2`	package.json
npm	@shikijs/rehype	`4.4.3`	package.json
npm	@tanstack/react-router	`1.170.29`	package.json
npm	@tanstack/react-start	`1.168.46`	package.json
npm	@vercel/analytics	`2.0.1`	package.json
npm	@vercel/oidc	`^3.8.4`	package.json
npm	@vercel/speed-insights	`2.0.0`	package.json
npm	class-variance-authority	`0.7.1`	package.json
npm	clawhub-schema	`workspace:0.0.2`	package.json
npm	clsx	`2.1.1`	package.json
npm	convex	`1.44.0`	package.json
npm	convex-helpers	`0.1.123`	package.json
npm	fflate	`0.8.3`	package.json
npm	h3	`2.0.1-rc.25`	package.json
npm	ignore	`7.0.6`	package.json
npm	jose	`6.2.9`	package.json
npm	lucide-react	`1.31.0`	package.json
npm	mermaid	`^11.16.1`	package.json
npm	mime	`4.1.0`	package.json
npm	monaco-editor	`0.56.0`	package.json
npm	parse5	`8.0.1`	package.json
npm	pino	`10.3.1`	package.json
npm	react	`19.2.8`	package.json
npm	react-dom	`19.2.8`	package.json
npm	react-markdown	`10.1.0`	package.json
npm	rehype-raw	`7.0.0`	package.json
npm	rehype-sanitize	`6.0.0`	package.json
npm	remark-gfm	`4.0.1`	package.json
npm	resend	`6.20.0`	package.json
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	package.json
npm	sharp	`0.35.4`	package.json
npm	shiki	`4.4.3`	package.json
npm	sonner	`2.0.8`	package.json
npm	tailwind-merge	`3.6.0`	package.json
npm	tailwindcss	`4.3.3`	package.json
npm	tw-animate-css	`1.4.0`	package.json
npm	unified	`11.0.5`	package.json
npm	unist-util-visit	`5.1.0`	package.json
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	package.json
npm	yauzl	`3.4.0`	package.json
npm	zod	`4.4.3`	package.json
npm	@clack/prompts	`1.7.0`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	arktype	`2.2.3`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	fflate	`0.8.3`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	ignore	`7.0.6`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	mime	`4.1.0`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	ora	`9.4.1`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	p-retry	`8.0.0`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	undici	`7.29.0`	packages/clawhub-admin/package.json
npm	@clack/prompts	`1.7.0`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	@openclaw/plugin-inspector	`0.3.23`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	arktype	`2.2.3`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	croner	`10.0.1`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	fflate	`0.8.3`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	ignore	`7.0.6`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	mime	`4.1.0`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	ora	`9.4.1`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	p-retry	`8.0.0`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	undici	`7.29.0`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	unicode-case-folding	`1.1.1`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	packages/clawhub/package.json
npm	arktype	`2.2.3`	packages/schema/package.json
npm	croner	`10.0.1`	packages/schema/package.json
npm	unicode-case-folding	`1.1.1`	packages/schema/package.json
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	packages/schema/package.json

All dependencies 119

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 71 direct and 48 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@auth/core	`0.41.3`	direct
npm	@clack/prompts	`1.7.0`	direct
npm	@convex-dev/auth	`0.0.95`	direct
npm	@convex-dev/migrations	`0.3.6`	direct
npm	@convex-dev/rate-limiter	`0.3.2`	direct
npm	@fontsource/bricolage-grotesque	`5.3.0`	direct
npm	@fontsource/ibm-plex-mono	`5.3.0`	direct
npm	@fontsource/noto-sans-sc	`5.3.0`	direct
npm	@monaco-editor/react	`4.7.0`	direct
npm	@openclaw/krillswitch-react	`0.0.1`	direct
npm	@openclaw/plugin-inspector	`0.3.23`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-avatar	`1.2.6`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-dialog	`1.1.23`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu	`2.1.24`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-label	`2.1.15`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-popover	`1.1.23`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-select	`2.3.7`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-separator	`1.1.15`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-slot	`1.3.3`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-toggle-group	`1.1.19`	direct
npm	@radix-ui/react-tooltip	`1.2.16`	direct
npm	@react-email/components	`^1.0.12`	direct
npm	@react-email/render	`^2.1.0`	direct
npm	@resvg/resvg-wasm	`2.6.2`	direct
npm	@shikijs/rehype	`4.4.3`	direct
npm	@tanstack/react-router	`1.170.29`	direct
npm	@tanstack/react-start	`1.168.46`	direct
npm	@vercel/analytics	`2.0.1`	direct
npm	@vercel/oidc	`^3.8.4`	direct
npm	@vercel/speed-insights	`2.0.0`	direct
npm	arktype	`2.2.3`	direct
npm	class-variance-authority	`0.7.1`	direct
npm	clsx	`2.1.1`	direct
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	direct
npm	convex	`1.44.0`	direct
npm	convex-helpers	`0.1.123`	direct
npm	croner	`10.0.1`	direct
npm	fflate	`0.8.3`	direct
npm	h3	`2.0.1-rc.25`	direct
npm	ignore	`7.0.6`	direct
npm	jose	`6.2.9`	direct
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	direct
npm	lucide-react	`1.31.0`	direct
npm	mermaid	`^11.16.1`	direct
npm	mime	`4.1.0`	direct
npm	monaco-editor	`0.56.0`	direct
npm	ora	`9.4.1`	direct
npm	p-retry	`8.0.0`	direct
npm	parse5	`8.0.1`	direct
npm	pino	`10.3.1`	direct
npm	react	`19.2.8`	direct
npm	react-dom	`19.2.8`	direct
npm	react-markdown	`10.1.0`	direct
npm	rehype-raw	`7.0.0`	direct
npm	rehype-sanitize	`6.0.0`	direct
npm	remark-gfm	`4.0.1`	direct
npm	resend	`6.20.0`	direct
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	direct
npm	sharp	`0.35.4`	direct
npm	shiki	`4.4.3`	direct
npm	sonner	`2.0.8`	direct
npm	tailwind-merge	`3.6.0`	direct
npm	tailwindcss	`4.3.3`	direct
npm	tw-animate-css	`1.4.0`	direct
npm	undici	`7.29.0`	direct
npm	unicode-case-folding	`1.1.1`	direct
npm	unified	`11.0.5`	direct
npm	unist-util-visit	`5.1.0`	direct
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	direct
npm	yauzl	`3.4.0`	direct
npm	zod	`4.4.3`	direct
npm	@edge-runtime/vm	`^5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@faker-js/faker	`^10.6.0`	indirect
npm	@playwright/test	`^1.63.0`	indirect
npm	@react-email/ui	`^6.9.5`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`^4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tanstack/devtools-vite	`0.8.5`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/dom	`10.4.1`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/react	`16.3.3`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.5.1`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`19.2.18`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`19.2.4`	indirect
npm	@types/semver	`7.8.0`	indirect
npm	@types/yauzl	`3.4.0`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react	`6.1.1`	indirect
npm	@vitest/coverage-v8	`4.1.11`	indirect
npm	convex-test	`^0.0.58`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`29.1.1`	indirect
npm	nitro	`3.0.260610-beta`	indirect
npm	only-allow	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	oxfmt	`0.67.0`	indirect
npm	oxlint	`1.82.0`	indirect
npm	oxlint-tsgolint	`7.0.2001`	indirect
npm	react-email	`^6.9.5`	indirect
npm	skills	`1.5.25`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	vitest	`4.1.11`	indirect
PyPI	aig-skill-scan	`0.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	chardet	`5.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	distro	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	jiter	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	loguru	`0.7.3`	indirect
PyPI	openai	`2.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.12.4`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.41.5`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	sniffio	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.70.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:clawhub@0.23.3 pulls in 46 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records