Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:31 UTC

openmessaging / dledger

A raft-based java library for building high-available, high-durable, strong-consistent commitlog.

JavaApache-2.0★ 830 stars⑂ 321 forkssince Nov 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

openmessaging/dledger holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (76/100) and lowest on Vitality (38/100). It was last updated 45 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

137 followers23 public repossince Mar 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger-proxy0.4.3-1063 days ago
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger0.4.3-2163 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

38Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 45 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume — 3 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push45
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,144 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~114 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagdledger-all-0.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,144
mean_days_between_releases114
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
47.3/60Stars — 830 stars
20.9/25Forks — 321 forks
8.8/15Watchers — 40 watchers
Inputs used
forks321
stars830
watchers40
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, shields.io, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 35 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled35
top_contributor_share0.34
How it's scored
32.6/42Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance — 142/174 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 20/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs142
open_issues33
closed_issues115
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.777
closed_unmerged_prs32
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.4/25Owner reach — 137 followers of openmessaging
22.1/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers137
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginopenmessaging
public_repos23
account_age_days3,492

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 63 days ago
20/20Version history — 21 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesio.openmessaging.storage:dledger-proxy, io.openmessaging.storage:dledger
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish63

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsraft, java-library, commitlog
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 20/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
1.5/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 21 affected: io.netty:netty-handler 4.1.130.Final (critical 9.1), at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java 1.10.3 (high 7.0), com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.18.1 (high 7.5), +18 more
9.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 18 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,194 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories71
affected_packages21
assessed_packages96
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 14, moderate 6
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the maven:io.openmessaging.storage:dledger@0.4.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 96 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 79 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.798
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — dledger/pom.xml, example/pom.xml, pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsdledger/pom.xml, example/pom.xml, pom.xml, proxy/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 1/167 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes60,803
source_files_sampled167
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

830GitHub stars
35contributors
3commits, last 12 months
45days since last push
13releases
2bus factor
33open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 321 ⇿
0Stars
321Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037531872019-012022-102026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 10:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1CI-Tests3 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 20/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.apache.rocketmq:rocketmq-remoting—dledger/pom.xml
Mavencom.alibaba.fastjson2:fastjson22.0.59dledger/pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api—dledger/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang3—dledger/pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-otlp—dledger/pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-prometheus—dledger/pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-logging—dledger/pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-sdk—dledger/pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j—dledger/pom.xml
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger-proxy${project.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger${project.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger-example${project.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple${slf4j-simple.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.yaml:snakeyaml${snakeyaml.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.rocketmq:rocketmq-remoting${rocketmq-remoting.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api${slf4j-api.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.beust:jcommander${jcommander.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang3${commons-lang3.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-otlp${opentelemetry.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-prometheus${opentelemetry-exporter-prometheus.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-logging${opentelemetry.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-sdk${opentelemetry.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j${jul-to-slf4j.version}pom.xml
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger—proxy/pom.xml
Mavenorg.yaml:snakeyaml—proxy/pom.xml
All dependencies 41

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 13 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.alibaba.fastjson2:fastjson22.0.59direct
Mavencom.beust:jcommander—direct
Mavencom.beust:jcommander1.72direct
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger—direct
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger0.3.3-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger-example0.3.3-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger-proxy—direct
Mavenio.openmessaging.storage:dledger-proxy0.3.3-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-logging—direct
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-logging1.26.0direct
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-otlp—direct
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-otlp1.26.0direct
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-prometheus—direct
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-exporter-prometheus1.26.0-alphadirect
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-sdk—direct
Mavenio.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-sdk1.26.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang3—direct
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.18.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.rocketmq:rocketmq-remoting—direct
Mavenorg.apache.rocketmq:rocketmq-remoting5.5.0direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j—direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:jul-to-slf4j2.0.6direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api—direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api1.7.36direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple—direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple1.7.36direct
Mavenorg.yaml:snakeyaml—direct
Mavenorg.yaml:snakeyaml1.30direct
Mavenio.dropwizard.metrics:metrics-core4.2.7indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin1.6indirect
Mavenorg.eluder.coveralls:coveralls-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.eluder.coveralls:coveralls-maven-plugin4.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.7.8indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api—indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api5.8.2indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core—indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core4.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.sonarsource.scanner.maven:sonar-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.sonarsource.scanner.maven:sonar-maven-plugin3.0.2indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.plugins:nexus-staging-maven-plugin1.6.3indirect
Dependency advisories 21

Installing maven:io.openmessaging.storage:dledger@0.4.3 pulls in 96 packages, direct and transitive: 21 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
io.netty:netty-handler4.1.130.Finalindirectcritical54.2.17.Final
at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java1.10.3indirecthigh61.11.4
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core2.18.1indirecthigh43.2.3
io.grpc:grpc-netty-shaded1.53.0indirecthigh14.2.4.Final
io.netty:netty-codec4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh24.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-dns4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh24.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh44.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-http4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh164.2.17.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-http24.1.130.Finalindirecthigh74.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-redis4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh64.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-stomp4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh24.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-codec-xml4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh24.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-handler-ssl-ocsp4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh34.2.16.Final
io.netty:netty-resolver-dns4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh34.2.15.Final
io.netty:netty-transport-sctp4.1.130.Finalindirecthigh24.2.17.Final
com.squareup.okio:okio3.2.0indirectmoderate13.4.0
io.netty:netty-codec-mqtt4.1.130.Finalindirectmoderate14.2.13.Final
io.netty:netty-handler-proxy4.1.130.Finalindirectmoderate14.2.13.Final
io.netty:netty-transport-native-epoll4.1.130.Finalindirectmoderate14.2.15.Final
io.netty:netty-transport-native-kqueue4.1.130.Finalindirectmoderate14.2.15.Final
io.opentelemetry:opentelemetry-api1.26.0indirectmoderate11.62.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.