Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 10:43 UTC

opentidehq / opentide

OpenTide — DetectionOps engine (PyPI package)

PythonEUPL-1.2★ 2 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolPluginMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined

opentidehq/opentide holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

opentideOrganization
87 followers15 public repossince Feb 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIopentide0.17.22,913380 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 642 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year642
human_commit_share0.74
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count38
latest_release_tagv0.17.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (EUPL-1.2)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.2/80Monthly downloads — 2,913 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesopentide
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,913
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 57% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.573
How it's scored
39.5/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance — 295/320 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 8/8 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs295
open_issues17
closed_issues267
prs_merged_7d21
prs_decided_7d22
prs_merged_30d47
prs_decided_30d48
issue_closed_ratio0.94
closed_unmerged_prs25
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d8
first_time_prs_decided_30d8
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14/25Owner reach — 87 followers of opentidehq
12.1/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers87
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginopentidehq
public_repos15
account_age_days617

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 38 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesopentide
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://opentide.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdetection-as-code, python, detectionops
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://opentide.org
docs_sitehttps://opentide.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 17/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages2
assessed_packages117
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 117 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://opentide.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 70 of 74 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://opentide.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.946
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,290
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/opentide/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 13 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/opentide/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.13
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.08
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/opentide/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/666 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes45,951
source_files_sampled666
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
4contributors
642commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
38releases
1bus factor
17open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:opentide@0.17.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-092026-092026-09
Major 0Minor 2Patch 9
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 10:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 17/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpyyaml—pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdulwich>=1.2.12pyproject.toml
PyPIorjson>=3.9pyproject.toml
PyPItomli>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPItomli-w>=1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIstructlog>=24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyping_extensions>=4.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.27.0pyproject.toml
PyPIruamel.yaml—pyproject.toml
PyPIquestionary>=2.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.34.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpymisp>=2.5.34.4pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.28.1,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-identity>=1.17pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-monitor-query>=1.4pyproject.toml
PyPIsplunk-sdk>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenpyxl>=3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIcarbon-black-cloud-sdk>=1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3>=1.35pyproject.toml
All dependencies 117

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 93 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIazure-identity1.26.0direct
PyPIazure-monitor-query2.0.0direct
PyPIboto31.43.36direct
PyPIcarbon-black-cloud-sdk1.5.10direct
PyPIdulwich1.2.17direct
PyPImcp1.30.0direct
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5direct
PyPIorjson3.13.0direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIpandas3.0.3direct
PyPIpydantic2.14.1direct
PyPIpymisp2.5.34.4direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIquestionary2.1.1direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1direct
PyPIsplunk-sdk2.1.1direct
PyPIsplunk-sdk3.0.0direct
PyPIstructlog26.1.0direct
PyPItomli2.5.0direct
PyPItomli-w1.2.0direct
PyPItyper0.27.3direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIazure-core1.41.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.36indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.3indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated3.0.0indirect
PyPIdeprecation2.1.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisodate0.7.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.5.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsal1.39.0indirect
PyPImsal-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.50.1indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-console-scripts1.4.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-split0.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.4indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.5.1indirect
PyPIruff0.17.1indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.0indirect
PyPIschema0.7.8indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsolrq1.1.2indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.5indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIsyrupy6.1.1indirect
PyPIty0.0.88indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.49.0indirect
PyPIvalidators0.35.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.14.5indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwrapt2.5.0indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 117 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
certifi2026.6.17indirecthigh22026.10.19
virtualenv21.14.5indirecthigh421.14.9

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.