Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 07:09 UTC

openziti / fablab

The Fabulous Laboratory

GoApache-2.0★ 16 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolTerminal interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

openziti/fablab holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (58/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OpenZitiOrganization
1,026 followers89 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/openziti/fablabv0.6.27-21331 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume — 65 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year65
human_commit_share0.82
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 31 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.6.27
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release31
mean_days_between_releases18.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars — 16 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars16
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

93Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.448
How it's scored
37.4/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
11.9/30PR acceptance — 205/517 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs205
open_issues8
closed_issues65
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.89
closed_unmerged_prs312
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.7/25Owner reach — 1,026 followers of openziti
25/25Track record — 89 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,026
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginopenziti
public_repos89
account_age_days2,342

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 31 days ago
20/20Version history — 213 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/openziti/fablab
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish31

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.56.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 103 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages2
assessed_packages68
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 68 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
28/40Legible commit history — 43 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.524
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 18 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.18
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 2/133 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes232,269
source_files_sampled133
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

16GitHub stars
9contributors
65commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
8open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
72Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512021-122023-112025-10
Major 0Minor 0Patch 72

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 07:09 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.46.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.33.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.20.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ec2v1.329.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/influxdata/influxdb-client-go/v2v2.14.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/influxdata/influxdb1-clientv0.0.0-20191209144304-8bf82d3c094dgo.mod
Gogithub.com/jedib0t/go-pretty/v6v6.8.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/michaelquigley/figletv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/michaelquigley/pfxlogv0.6.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/natefinch/npipev0.0.0-20160621034901-c1b8fa8bdccego.mod
Gogithub.com/oliveagle/jsonpathv0.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/openziti/foundation/v2v2.0.104go.mod
Gogithub.com/orcaman/concurrent-map/v2v2.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/sftpv1.13.11go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.56.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.46.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
All dependencies 68

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.46.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.33.3direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.20.3direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ec2v1.329.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/influxdata/influxdb-client-go/v2v2.14.0direct
Gogithub.com/influxdata/influxdb1-clientv0.0.0-20191209144304-8bf82d3c094ddirect
Gogithub.com/jedib0t/go-pretty/v6v6.8.3direct
Gogithub.com/michaelquigley/figletv0.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/michaelquigley/pfxlogv0.6.10direct
Gogithub.com/natefinch/npipev0.0.0-20160621034901-c1b8fa8bdccedirect
Gogithub.com/oliveagle/jsonpathv0.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/openziti/foundation/v2v2.0.104direct
Gogithub.com/orcaman/concurrent-map/v2v2.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/sftpv1.13.11direct
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.56.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.46.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/apapsch/go-jsonmerge/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.19.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.8.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.19indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.14.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.42.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.49.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.28.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.6indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbufv0.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/stringishv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/erikgeiser/coninputv0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0findirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/influxdata/line-protocolv0.0.0-20200327222509-2487e7298839indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/fsv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-localereaderv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.19indirect
Gogithub.com/mgutz/ansiv0.0.0-20200706080929-d51e80ef957dindirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/ansiv0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/oapi-codegen/runtimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.48.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.41.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/npipe.v2v2.0.0-20160621034901-c1b8fa8bdcceindirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 68 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.56.0directunknown1—
golang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirectunknown51.27.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.