Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 00:16 UTC

orchestral / workbench

Workbench Companion for Laravel Packages Development

PHP · BladeMIT★ 85 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

orchestral/workbench holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (34/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OrchestraOrganization

59 followers83 public repossince Sep 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	orchestra/workbench	v11.2.0	1,441,142	130	49 days ago	testing laravel dev laravel-packages

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 2 days ago
17.3/36	Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 147 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	147
human_commit_share	0.9
days_since_last_push	2
active_weeks_last_year	25

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 49 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~21.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v11.2.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	49
mean_days_between_releases	21.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak

How it's scored

31.2/60	Stars — 85 stars
5/25	Forks — 5 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	5
stars	85
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

92Excellent

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 1,441,142 downloads/month across packagist
11.9/20	Registry dependents — 59 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	orchestra/workbench
dependents	59
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	23,442,367
monthly_downloads	1,441,142
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.998

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good

How it's scored

39.9/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
28.7/30	PR acceptance — 87/91 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	87
open_issues	1
closed_issues	19
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.95
closed_unmerged_prs	4
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12.8/25	Owner reach — 59 followers of orchestral
25/25	Track record — 83 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	59
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	orchestral
public_repos	83
account_age_days	5,107

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 49 days ago
20/20	Version history — 130 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	orchestra/workbench
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	49

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

64Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

55Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://packages.tools/workbench
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://packages.tools/workbench
docs_site	https://packages.tools/workbench
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	127
unassessed_packages	17
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 127 resolved dependencies against OSV. 17 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

6Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
6.5/40	Legible commit history — 11 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.122
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/123 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	11,529
source_files_sampled	123
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — recipes

Inputs used

example_dirs	recipes
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

85GitHub stars

3contributors

147commits, last 12 months

2days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿

0Stars

5Forks

10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 8Patch 1

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 00:16 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8	CI-Tests	7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	fakerphp/faker	`^1.23`	composer.json
Packagist	laravel/framework	`^13.0.0`	composer.json
Packagist	laravel/pail	`^1.2.5`	composer.json
Packagist	laravel/tinker	`^3.0.0`	composer.json
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`^8.9`	composer.json
Packagist	orchestra/canvas	`^11.0.1`	composer.json
Packagist	orchestra/sidekick	`~1.1.23\|~1.2.20`	composer.json
Packagist	orchestra/testbench-core	`^11.1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/process	`^7.4\|^8.0`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`^7.4\|^8.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 144

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 134 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	fakerphp/faker	`—`	direct
Packagist	laravel/framework	`—`	direct
Packagist	laravel/pail	`—`	direct
Packagist	laravel/tinker	`—`	direct
Packagist	nunomaduro/collision	`—`	direct
Packagist	orchestra/canvas	`—`	direct
Packagist	orchestra/sidekick	`—`	direct
Packagist	orchestra/testbench-core	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/process	`—`	direct
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`—`	direct
npm	@alloc/quick-lru	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.139.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/forms	`0.5.11`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	alpinejs	`3.15.12`	indirect
npm	any-promise	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	anymatch	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	arg	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	autoprefixer	`10.5.4`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.11.21`	indirect
npm	binary-extensions	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.9`	indirect
npm	camelcase-css	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001810`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	cssesc	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	didyoumean	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	dlv	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.422`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	fraction.js	`5.3.4`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-binary-path	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.2`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	jiti	`1.21.7`	indirect
npm	laravel-vite-plugin	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mini-svg-data-uri	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	mz	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.54`	indirect
npm	normalize-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-hash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	pify	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	pirates	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.26`	indirect
npm	postcss-import	`15.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-js	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-load-config	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-nested	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`6.1.4`	indirect
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	read-cache	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.12`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	sucrase	`3.35.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	tailwindcss	`3.4.19`	indirect
npm	thenify	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	thenify-all	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ts-interface-checker	`0.1.13`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.1.5`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-full-reload	`1.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer-runtime-api	`—`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`—`	indirect
Packagist	mockery/mockery	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/laravel-ray	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 127 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 17 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records