Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 12:00 UTC

orchestral / workbench

Workbench Companion for Laravel Packages Development

PHP · BladeMIT★ 83 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Aug 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

orchestral/workbench holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OrchestraOrganization
60 followers83 public repossince Sep 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistorchestra/workbenchv11.1.01,133,110128114 days agotestinglaraveldevlaravel-packages

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

80Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 146 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year146
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year23

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 114 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv10.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release114
mean_days_between_releases7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

36Weak
How it's scored
31/60Stars — 83 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars83
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

91Excellent
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 1,133,110 downloads/month across packagist
11.4/20Registry dependents — 50 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesorchestra/workbench
dependents50
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads20,925,472
monthly_downloads1,133,110
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.982

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
39.8/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
28.7/30PR acceptance — 85/89 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs85
open_issues1
closed_issues18
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.947
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
12.8/25Owner reach — 60 followers of orchestral
25/25Track record — 83 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers60
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginorchestral
public_repos83
account_age_days5,052
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 114 days ago
20/20Version history — 128 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesorchestra/workbench
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish114

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

64Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://packages.tools/workbench
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://packages.tools/workbench
docs_sitehttps://packages.tools/workbench
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

46Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/123 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes11,529
source_files_sampled123
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsrecipes
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

83GitHub stars
4contributors
146commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 12:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests5 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistfakerphp/faker^1.23composer.json
Packagistlaravel/framework^13.0.0composer.json
Packagistlaravel/pail^1.2.5composer.json
Packagistlaravel/tinker^3.0.0composer.json
Packagistnunomaduro/collision^8.9composer.json
Packagistorchestra/canvas^11.0.1composer.json
Packagistorchestra/sidekick~1.1.23|~1.2.20composer.json
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core^11.1.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.4|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^7.4|^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 144

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 134 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfakerphp/faker—direct
Packagistlaravel/framework—direct
Packagistlaravel/pail—direct
Packagistlaravel/tinker—direct
Packagistnunomaduro/collision—direct
Packagistorchestra/canvas—direct
Packagistorchestra/sidekick—direct
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core—direct
Packagistsymfony/process—direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml—direct
npm@alloc/quick-lru5.2.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.11indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.1.5indirect
npm@vue/shared3.1.5indirect
npmalpinejs3.15.12indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarg5.0.2indirect
npmautoprefixer10.5.0indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.10.27indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.2indirect
npmcamelcase-css2.0.1indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001792indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdidyoumean1.2.2indirect
npmdlv1.1.3indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.352indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastq1.20.1indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfraction.js5.3.4indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.3indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.2indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmjiti1.21.7indirect
npmlaravel-vite-plugin3.1.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.3indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmini-svg-data-uri1.4.4indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.38indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-hash3.0.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpify2.3.0indirect
npmpirates4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmpostcss-import15.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-js4.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-load-config6.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-nested6.2.0indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.1.2indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmread-cache1.0.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.12indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsucrase3.35.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtailwindcss3.4.19indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmvite-plugin-full-reload1.2.0indirect
Packagistcomposer-runtime-api—indirect
Packagistlaravel/pint—indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-ray—indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with orchestral/workbench. Read them side by side →

94fruitcake/laravel-debugbarDebugbar for Laravel (Integrates PHP Debug Bar)Exceptional94phpstan/phpstanPHP Static Analysis Tool - discover bugs in your code without running it!Exceptional92laravel/duskLaravel Dusk provides simple end-to-end testing and browser automation.Excellent95laravel/boostLaravel-focused MCP server for augmenting your AI powered local development experience.Exceptional89psalm/psalm-plugin-laravelSecurity-focused Laravel static analyserExcellent95laravel/horizonDashboard and code-driven configuration for Laravel queues.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.