Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-21 12:03 UTC

os72 / protoc-jar-maven-plugin

Protocol Buffers protobuf maven plugin - based on protoc-jar multi-platform executable protoc JAR

JavaApache-2.0★ 261 stars⑂ 76 forkssince Jun 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

os72/protoc-jar-maven-plugin holds a health index of 21 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (55/100) and lowest on Vitality (17/100). It was last updated 1211 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

21
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

21
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

os72Personal account
41 followers12 public repossince Feb 2014tibco, paypal, workday

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavencom.github.os72:protoc-jar-maven-plugin3.11.4-492357 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

17Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 1,211 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push1,211
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases21 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,357 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~92.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tagv3.11.4
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,357
mean_days_between_releases92.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.2/60Stars261 stars
15.6/25Forks76 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks76
stars261
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 92% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.924
How it's scored
29.9/42Issue resolution71% of issues closed
17.4/30PR acceptance18/31 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs18
open_issues30
closed_issues74
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.712
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.7/25Owner reach41 followers of os72
20.1/25Track record12 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers41
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginos72
public_repos12
account_age_days4,581
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on maven
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 2,357 days ago
20/20Version history49 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescom.github.os72:protoc-jar-maven-plugin
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2,357

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttp://os72.github.io/protoc-jar-maven-plugin/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava, protobuf, protocol-buffers, protoc, protobuf-compiler, protoc-plugins, maven-plugin
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://os72.github.io/protoc-jar-maven-plugin/
docs_sitehttp://os72.github.io/protoc-jar-maven-plugin/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
6.4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils 3.0 (critical 9.8), commons-io:commons-io 2.2 (high 7.5)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
27.9/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,942 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages2
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1
direct_affected_packages2
Matched the maven:com.github.os72:protoc-jar-maven-plugin@3.11.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 17 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.4/40Legible commit history10 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.101
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrappom.xml, src/test/projects/basic-test/pom.xml, src/test/projects/grpc-test/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml, src/test/projects/basic-test/pom.xml, src/test/projects/grpc-test/pom.xml, src/test/projects/import-test/pom.xml, src/test/projects/javalite-test/pom.xml, src/test/projects/mvn-compile-test/pom.xml, src/test/projects/shading-test/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/9 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes30,097
source_files_sampled9
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)src/test/projects/basic-test/testprotos/PersonSchema.proto, src/test/projects/grpc-test/testprotos/grpc-hello.proto, src/test/projects/import-test/testprotos/dir1/Schema1.proto, src/test/projects/import-test/testprotos/dir2/Schema2.proto, src/test/projects/import-test/testprotos/dir3/Schema3.proto, src/test/projects/javalite-test/testprotos/PersonSchema.proto, src/test/projects/shading-test/testprotos/PersonSchema.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filessrc/test/projects/basic-test/testprotos/PersonSchema.proto, src/test/projects/grpc-test/testprotos/grpc-hello.proto, src/test/projects/import-test/testprotos/dir1/Schema1.proto, src/test/projects/import-test/testprotos/dir2/Schema2.proto, src/test/projects/import-test/testprotos/dir3/Schema3.proto, src/test/projects/javalite-test/testprotos/PersonSchema.proto, src/test/projects/shading-test/testprotos/PersonSchema.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

261GitHub stars
9contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,211days since last push
21releases
1bus factor
30open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 76 ⇿
0Stars
76Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063757232014-062019-112025-03
Major 1Minor 8Patch 6

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.6 / 10
2.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-21 12:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.github.os72:protoc-jar3.11.4pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api2.0.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-project2.0.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.sonatype.plexus:plexus-build-api0.0.7pom.xml
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.0pom.xml
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.2pom.xml
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 16 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.github.os72:protoc-jar3.11.4direct
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.2direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api2.0.9direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-project2.0.9direct
Mavenorg.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.0direct
Mavenorg.sonatype.plexus:plexus-build-api0.0.7direct
Mavencom.github.os72:protobuf-java-shaded-3600.9indirect
Mavencom.github.os72:protoc-jar-maven-pluginindirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java3.10.0indirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java3.11.4indirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-javalite3.10.0indirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-protobuf1.25.0indirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-stub1.25.0indirect
Mavenio.takari.maven.plugins:takari-lifecycle-plugin1.11.9indirect
Mavenio.takari.maven.plugins:takari-plugin-integration-testing2.9.1indirect
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin2.5.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin2.9.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin2.2.1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

Installing maven:com.github.os72:protoc-jar-maven-plugin@3.11.4 pulls in 17 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils3.0directcritical44.0.3
commons-io:commons-io2.2directhigh22.14.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.