Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-14 11:56 UTC

oszuidwest / zwfm-encoder

Software to turn a Raspberry Pi into a production grade audio encoder

GoMIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationhow this is determined

oszuidwest/zwfm-encoder holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

19 followers39 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/oszuidwest/zwfm-encoderv1.0.0-7230 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume340 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year340
human_commit_share0.77
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases60 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 30 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~2.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count60
latest_release_tagv1.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases2.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.995
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
28.7/30PR acceptance290/303 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs290
open_issues1
closed_issues76
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.987
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
9.4/25Owner reach19 followers of oszuidwest
23.7/25Track record39 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers19
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginoszuidwest
public_repos39
account_age_days2,303
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history72 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/oszuidwest/zwfm-encoder
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml, biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsraspberry-pi, ffmpeg, hifiberry, stl, streaming, streaming-audio, audio
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: golang.org/x/mod v0.38.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages31
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 31 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history77 of 77 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml, biome.json
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance23 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.23
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes1/124 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes86,778
source_files_sampled124
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
340commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
60releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-14 11:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gofyne.io/systrayv1.12.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.43.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.34go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/transfermanagerv0.3.11go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.107.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/datarhei/gosrtv0.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0go.mod
All dependencies 31

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gofyne.io/systrayv1.12.2direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.43.4direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.34direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/transfermanagerv0.3.11direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.107.0direct
Gogithub.com/datarhei/gosrtv0.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.16indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.35indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.35indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.36indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.15indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.28indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.35indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.36indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.27.6indirect
Gogithub.com/benburkert/openpgpv0.0.0-20160410205803-c2471f86866cindirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.4.1-0.20240526193622-a339e1f7089cindirect
Gogithub.com/godbus/dbus/v5v5.1.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp/typeparamsv0.0.0-20231108232855-2478ac86f678indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/telemetryv0.0.0-20260625142307-59b4966ccb57indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/vulnv1.3.0indirect
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.7.0indirect
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.7indirect
npmhtmlhint1.9.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 31 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/modv0.38.0directunknown21.27.0-rc.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.