Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-21 20:19 UTC

ota-meshi / eslint-plugin-jsonc

ESLint plugin for JSON(C|5)? files

TypeScriptMIT★ 240 stars⑂ 27 forkssince Jul 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginhow this is determined

ota-meshi/eslint-plugin-jsonc holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Security (62/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Yosuke OtaPersonal account
765 followers190 public repossince Jan 2016@future-architect

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmeslint-plugin-jsonc3.4.25,388,8227130 days agoeslinteslintplugineslint-pluginlintjsoncjson5json

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 14 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume115 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year115
human_commit_share0.34
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases70 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 30 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~20.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count70
latest_release_tagv3.4.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases20.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.6/60Stars240 stars
11.8/25Forks27 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks27
stars240
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads5,388,822 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageseslint-plugin-jsonc
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads5,388,822
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 81% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth18 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled18
top_contributor_share0.813
How it's scored
39/42Issue resolution93% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance416/458 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs416
open_issues6
closed_issues78
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.929
closed_unmerged_prs42
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
20.7/25Owner reach765 followers of ota-meshi
25/25Track record190 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers765
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginota-meshi
public_repos190
account_age_days3,916
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history71 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageseslint-plugin-jsonc
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests24 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://ota-meshi.github.io/eslint-plugin-jsonc/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicseslint-plugin, json, jsonc, json5
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ota-meshi.github.io/eslint-plugin-jsonc/
docs_sitehttps://ota-meshi.github.io/eslint-plugin-jsonc/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests24 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages20
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:eslint-plugin-jsonc@3.4.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 20 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history34 of 34 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer
10/10Demonstrated agent practice6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance54 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.54
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/165 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes42,810
source_files_sampled165
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

240GitHub stars
18contributors
115commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
70releases
1bus factor
6open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 27 ⇿
0Stars
27Forks
53Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302612021-022023-112026-08
Major 2Minor 32Patch 19

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-21 20:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests24 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils^4.5.1package.json
npm@eslint/core^1.0.1package.json
npm@eslint/plugin-kit^0.7.0package.json
npm@ota-meshi/ast-token-store^0.3.0package.json
npmdiff-sequences^29.6.3package.json
npmeslint-json-compat-utils^0.2.3package.json
npmjsonc-eslint-parser^3.1.0package.json
npmnatural-compare^1.4.0package.json
npmsynckit^0.11.12package.json
All dependencies 64

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 54 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils^4.5.1direct
npm@eslint/core^1.0.1direct
npm@eslint/plugin-kit^0.7.0direct
npm@ota-meshi/ast-token-store^0.3.0direct
npmdiff-sequences^29.6.3direct
npmeslint-json-compat-utils^0.2.3direct
npmjsonc-eslint-parser^3.0.0direct
npmjsonc-eslint-parser^3.1.0direct
npmnatural-compare^1.4.0direct
npmsynckit^0.11.12direct
npm@babel/eslint-parser^8.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/changelog-github^1.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/cli^3.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/get-release-plan^5.0.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-plugin-eslint-comments^4.4.1indirect
npm@eslint/json^2.0.0indirect
npm@ota-meshi/eslint-plugin^0.20.0indirect
npm@ota-meshi/site-kit-eslint-editor-vue^0.2.4indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin^5.7.1indirect
npm@swc-node/register^1.11.1indirect
npm@types/mocha^10.0.10indirect
npm@types/natural-compare^1.4.3indirect
npm@types/node^24.0.0indirect
npm@types/semver^7.5.8indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^8.28.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^8.28.0indirect
npmc8^12.0.0indirect
npmenv-cmd^11.0.0indirect
npmesbuild^0.28.0indirect
npmeslint^10.0.0indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier^10.1.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-eslint-plugin^7.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-eslint-rule-tester^0.6.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jsdoc^64.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-json-schema-validator^6.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jsonc^3.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-markdown^5.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-markdown^5.1.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-n^18.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-node-dependencies^2.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier^5.2.4indirect
npmeslint-plugin-regexp^3.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-vue^10.0.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-yml^3.0.0indirect
npmeslint-scope^9.1.0indirect
npmevents^3.3.0indirect
npmglobals^17.0.0indirect
npmmocha^11.1.0indirect
npmpako^3.0.0indirect
npmprettier^3.5.3indirect
npmsemver^7.7.1indirect
npmstylelint^17.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-recommended-vue^2.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard^40.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard-vue^2.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-stylus^1.0.0indirect
npmtsdown^0.21.0indirect
npmtsx^4.21.0indirect
npmtypescript^5.8.2indirect
npmtypescript-eslint^8.28.0indirect
npmvite-plugin-eslint4b^0.9.0indirect
npmvitepress^1.6.3indirect
npmvue-eslint-parser^10.0.0indirect
npmvue-eslint-parser^10.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:eslint-plugin-jsonc@3.4.2 pulls in 20 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.