Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 18:03 UTC

overhangio / tutor

The Docker-based Open edX distribution designed for peace of mind

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 1,125 stars⑂ 511 forkssince Jul 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#openedx#edx-platform#lms#cms#python#docker#docker-compose#kubernetes

overhangio/tutor holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Security (62/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Overhang.IOOrganization
64 followers36 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPItutor22.0.214,67812213 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

91Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 182 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year182
human_commit_share0.9
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 13 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv22.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases15.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

80Excellent
How it's scored
49.5/60Stars — 1,125 stars
22.6/25Forks — 511 forks
8.2/15Watchers — 31 watchers
Inputs used
forks511
stars1,125
watchers31
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good
How it's scored
55.6/80Monthly downloads — 14,678 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestutor
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads14,678
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.772

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
39.9/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
22.6/30PR acceptance — 631/839 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs631
open_issues31
closed_issues585
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.95
closed_unmerged_prs208
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

66Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13/25Owner reach — 64 followers of overhangio
23.4/25Track record — 36 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers64
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginoverhangio
public_repos36
account_age_days2,639

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 13 days ago
20/20Version history — 122 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestutor
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish13

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.tutor.edly.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopenedx, edx-platform, lms, cms, python, docker, docker-compose, kubernetes
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.tutor.edly.io/
docs_sitehttps://docs.tutor.edly.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

74Good
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: click 8.2.2 (high 7.2)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
33.9/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 136 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages36
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:tutor@22.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 36 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

37Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.3/40Legible commit history — 63 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.7
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — tutor/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstutor/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (tutor/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/95 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes30,560
source_files_sampled95
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,125GitHub stars
98contributors
182commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
31open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 511 ⇿
0Stars
511Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050050062018-012022-052026-09
Major 9Minor 11Patch 80

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 18:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesinternal error: internal error: invalid Dockerfile: Syntax error - can't find = in "MONGODB_HOST". Must be of the form: name=value
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 100

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 100 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIaltgraph0.17.5indirect
PyPIappdirs1.4.4indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.4.4indirect
PyPIcachetools5.5.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.8.3indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.1.8indirect
PyPIclick-log0.4.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.7indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIdurationpy0.10indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.40.3indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.16indirect
PyPIimagesize1.5.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.5.2indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIkubernetes35.0.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPImacholib1.16.4indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.5indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.3.1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpip-tools7.5.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.3indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyinstaller6.20.0indirect
PyPIpyinstaller-hooks-contrib2026.5indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.14indirect
PyPIscriv1.7.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx7.4.7indirect
PyPIsphinx-click6.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-reredirects0.1.6indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItutor-android—indirect
PyPItutor-cairn—indirect
PyPItutor-credentials—indirect
PyPItutor-deck—indirect
PyPItutor-discovery—indirect
PyPItutor-forum—indirect
PyPItutor-indigo—indirect
PyPItutor-jupyter—indirect
PyPItutor-livedeps—indirect
PyPItutor-mfe—indirect
PyPItutor-minio—indirect
PyPItutor-notes—indirect
PyPItutor-xqueue—indirect
PyPItwine7.0.0indirect
PyPItypes-docutils0.22.3.20251115indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20250915indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.4.20260107indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwheel0.47.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:tutor@22.0.2 pulls in 36 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
click8.2.2directhigh18.3.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with overhangio/tutor. Read them side by side →

99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional100aws/aws-sam-cliCLI tool to build, test, debug, and deploy Serverless applications using AWS SAMExceptional99podman-container-tools/podmanPodman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.Exceptional99argoproj/argo-cdDeclarative Continuous Deployment for KubernetesExceptional98pulumi/pulumiPulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀Exceptional98traefik/traefikThe Cloud Native Application ProxyExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.