Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 20:31 UTC

oxidecomputer / ingot

Bare-metal, zero-copy packet manipulation

RustMPL-2.0★ 12 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jul 2024View on GitHub ↗

oxidecomputer/ingot holds a health index of 42 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (67/100) and lowest on Vitality (23/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

42
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

42
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

2,883 followers402 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioingot-macros0.2.014,70230 days agonetworkingpacketparserrawnetwork-programmingparsingno-std
crates.ioingot-types0.2.014,68440 days agonetworkingpacketparserrawnetwork-programmingparsingno-std
crates.ioingot0.2.014,66330 days agonetworkingpacketparserrawnetwork-programmingparsingno-std

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

23At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.9/60Stars12 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
7.1/15Watchers20 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars12
watchers20
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
61.9/80Monthly downloads44,049 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesingot-macros, ingot-types, ingot
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads505,070
monthly_downloads44,049
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 55% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.545
How it's scored
7.6/42Issue resolution18% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance23/23 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 22/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs23
open_issues9
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.182
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
24.9/25Owner reach2,883 followers of oxidecomputer
25/25Track record402 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,883
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginoxidecomputer
public_repos402
account_age_days2,534
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
12/20Version history4 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesingot-macros, ingot-types, ingot
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

27At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/ingot-macros
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/ingot-macros
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 22/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages77
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 77 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes1/30 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes99,601
source_files_sampled30
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

12GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
9open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch crates package 'ingot-examples' from its registry
  • deps.dev does not index crates:ingot@0.2.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 20:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 22/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioingotingot-examples/Cargo.toml
crates.iodarlingingot-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertoolsingot-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2ingot-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquoteingot-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregexingot-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyningot-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioingot-macrosingot-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iomacaddringot-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iozerocopyingot-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflagsingot/Cargo.toml
crates.ioingot-macrosingot/Cargo.toml
crates.ioingot-typesingot/Cargo.toml
crates.iomacaddringot/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserdeingot/Cargo.toml
crates.iozerocopyingot/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 77

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 65 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobitflags2.9.1direct
crates.iodarling0.23.0direct
crates.ioitertools0.10.5direct
crates.ioitertools0.13.0direct
crates.ioitertools0.15.0direct
crates.iomacaddr1.0.1direct
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.95direct
crates.ioquote1.0.40direct
crates.ioregex1.11.1direct
crates.ioserde1.0.219direct
crates.iosyn2.0.104direct
crates.iozerocopy0.8.26direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.3indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.11indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.19.0indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.1indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.5.41indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.41indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.7.5indirect
crates.iocriterion0.6.0indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iodarling_core0.23.0indirect
crates.iodarling_macro0.23.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.iohalf2.6.0indirect
crates.ioident_case1.0.1indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.15indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.77indirect
crates.iolog0.4.27indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.5indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.iorayon1.10.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.12.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.9indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.5indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.21indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.20indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.219indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.140indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.18indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-backend0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.100indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.100indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.77indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.9indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.26indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 77 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
crossbeam-epoch0.9.18indirectunknown10.9.20

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.