Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 18:01 UTC

pH7Software / pH7-Social-Dating-CMS

Self-hosted, open-source PHP 8.2+ software for building white-label dating sites, matchmaking communities, and social networks. Own your code, hosting, database, and member data.

PHPMIT★ 1,056 stars⑂ 607 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

pH7Software/pH7-Social-Dating-CMS holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (94/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (58/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

83 followers22 public repossince May 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 476 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year476
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year27
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv19.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases9.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49/60Stars — 1,056 stars
23.2/25Forks — 607 forks
10.9/15Watchers — 93 watchers
Inputs used
forks607
stars1,056
watchers93
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
13.9/80Monthly downloads — 10 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesph7software/ph7builder
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads925
monthly_downloads10
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 33 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.996
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance — 177/207 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs177
open_issues1
closed_issues897
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d19
prs_decided_30d19
issue_closed_ratio0.999
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.8/25Owner reach — 83 followers of pH7Software
21.9/25Track record — 22 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers83
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpH7Software
public_repos22
account_age_days5,221

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history — 129 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesph7software/ph7builder
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

94Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ph7builder.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdating, social-network, dating-software, php-cms, social-networking, dating-script, social-cms, dating-app, dating-website, matchmaking, community-management, website-builder, community-platform, membership-platform, mysql, open-source, php, pwa, self-hosted, white-label-dating
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ph7builder.com
docs_sitehttps://ph7builder.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 33 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages103
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 103 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
13.3/40Legible commit history — 25 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.25
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,250
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 3/1,131 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes254,963
source_files_sampled1,131
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

1,056GitHub stars
10contributors
476commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'ph7software/ph7builder-install' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 607 ⇿
0Stars
607Forks
97Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500600597112013-062020-012026-08
Major 5Minor 24Patch 25

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 18:00 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistsmarty/smarty>=4.5.7 <4.5.8_install/composer.json
Packagistarcturial/clickatell^3.0composer.json
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php^3.200composer.json
Packagistbacon/bacon-qr-code^3.0composer.json
Packagistbraintree/braintree_php^6.0composer.json
Packagistezyang/htmlpurifier^4.19composer.json
Packagistfakerphp/faker^1.24composer.json
Packagistgeoip2/geoip2^3.3composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.4composer.json
Packagistph-7/cute-link-names^2.0composer.json
Packagistph-7/datatype^1.0composer.json
Packagistph-7/html-to-text^2.0composer.json
Packagistph-7/just-http-status-codes^1.1composer.json
Packagistph-7/passcode-password-generator^2.0composer.json
Packagistph-7/ph2gravatar^2.0composer.json
Packagistrobthree/twofactorauth^3.0composer.json
Packagiststripe/stripe-php^20.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mailer^7.4composer.json
Packagisttwbs/bootstrap^3.4composer.json
Packagisttwilio/sdk^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 105

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistarcturial/clickatell3.0.0direct
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php3.390.2direct
Packagistbacon/bacon-qr-code3.1.1direct
Packagistbraintree/braintree_php6.36.0direct
Packagistezyang/htmlpurifier4.19.0direct
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1direct
Packagistgeoip2/geoip23.4.0direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.15.2direct
Packagistph-7/cute-link-names2.0.1direct
Packagistph-7/datatype1.0.2direct
Packagistph-7/html-to-text2.0.1direct
Packagistph-7/just-http-status-codes1.1.7direct
Packagistph-7/passcode-password-generator2.0.9direct
Packagistph-7/ph2gravatar2.0.1direct
Packagistrobthree/twofactorauth3.0.3direct
Packagistsmarty/smarty—direct
Packagiststripe/stripe-php20.3.1direct
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.18direct
Packagistsymfony/mailer7.4.17direct
Packagisttwbs/bootstrap3.4.1direct
Packagisttwilio/sdk8.11.6direct
Packagistaws/aws-crt-php1.2.7indirect
Packagistclue/ndjson-react1.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/ca-bundle1.5.13indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdasprid/enum1.0.7indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.5.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistergebnis/agent-detector1.2.0indirect
Packagistevenement/evenement3.0.2indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.95.18indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.13.0indirect
Packagistmaxmind-db/reader1.13.1indirect
Packagistmaxmind/web-service-common0.11.1indirect
Packagistmtdowling/jmespath.php2.9.2indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistphake/phake4.7.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.7indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage11.0.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator5.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker5.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template4.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit11.5.56indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistreact/cache1.2.0indirect
Packagistreact/child-process0.6.7indirect
Packagistreact/dns1.14.0indirect
Packagistreact/event-loop1.6.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistreact/socket1.17.0indirect
Packagistreact/stream1.4.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator6.3.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment7.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter6.3.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code3.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator6.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context6.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type5.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/version5.0.2indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.4indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.15indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.15indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime7.4.15indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.15indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 103 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.