Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-30 17:43 UTC

paiml / trueno-rag

MOVED → https://github.com/paiml/aprender (crates/aprender-rag)

RustMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 1 forksince Nov 2025archivedView on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#paiml-merged#paiml-read-only

paiml/trueno-rag holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Pragmatic AI LabsOrganization
332 followers193 public repossince Nov 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iotrueno-ragpoints to another repo — not scored0.3.054320145 days agoaprenderdeprecatedmoved
crates.iotrueno-rag-cli0.1.586183 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

41Weak
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 145 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 173 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year173
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push145
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

62Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 231 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.1.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release231
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

16Critical
How it's scored
12.7/80Monthly downloads — 8 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestrueno-rag-cli
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads320
monthly_downloads8
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate
How it's scored
30.5/42Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed
15/30PR acceptance — 6/12 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues3
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.727
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

73Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.1/25Owner reach — 332 followers of paiml
25/25Track record — 193 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers332
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpaiml
public_repos193
account_age_days3,569

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 183 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestrueno-rag-cli
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish183

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .clippy.toml, Cargo.toml ([lints], [workspace.lints]), crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/paiml/aprender
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspaiml-merged, paiml-read-only
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/paiml/aprender
docs_sitehttps://github.com/paiml/aprender
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

92Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,970

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

91Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .clippy.toml, Cargo.toml ([lints], [workspace.lints]), crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 87 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.87
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 1/65 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes489,842
source_files_sampled65
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
1contributors
173commits, last 12 months
145days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
3open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'trueno-rag' points at a different repository (https://github.com/paiml/aprender); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-30 17:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 28
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotrueno0.17Cargo.toml
crates.iotrueno-db0.3.17Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.49Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1.11Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iobatuta-common0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iolz4_flex0.11Cargo.toml
crates.iozstd0.13Cargo.toml
crates.iobincode1.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorusqlite0.32Cargo.toml
crates.iofastembed5Cargo.toml
crates.iorealizar0.7Cargo.toml
crates.iowhisper-apr0.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.12Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8Cargo.toml
crates.iotrueno-rag0.2.0crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.49crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.11crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglobset0.4crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake31.5crates/trueno-rag-cli/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with paiml/trueno-rag. Read them side by side →

19paiml/truenoMOVED → https://github.com/paiml/aprender (crates/aprender-compute)Critical19paiml/trueno-vizMOVED → https://github.com/paiml/aprender (crates/aprender-viz)Critical19paiml/trueno-graphMOVED → https://github.com/paiml/aprender (crates/aprender-graph)Critical10paiml/batuta-commonMOVED → https://github.com/paiml/aprender (crates/aprender-common)Critical100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.