Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 17:28 UTC

palantir / godel-amalgomate-plugin

godel plugin that runs amalgomate

Go · ShellApache-2.0★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Apr 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

palantir/godel-amalgomate-plugin holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

4,432 followers266 public repossince Jun 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/palantir/godel-amalgomate-pluginv1.58.0-607 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume193 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year193
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year44
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases61 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~43.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count61
latest_release_tagv1.58.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases43.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars4 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
13.4/15Watchers255 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers255
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 93% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.926
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
29.2/30PR acceptance580/595 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs580
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach4,432 followers of palantir
25/25Track record266 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,432
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginpalantir
public_repos266
account_age_days5,880
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history60 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/palantir/godel-amalgomate-plugin
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsocto-correct-managed
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapvendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesvendor/github.com/pkg/errors/Makefile, vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes2,507
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
4contributors
193commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
61releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 17:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/palantir/amalgomatev1.58.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/palantir/godel/pkg/products/v2v2.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/palantir/godel/v2v2.159.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/palantir/pkg/cobracliv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 38 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/palantir/amalgomatev1.58.0direct
Gogithub.com/palantir/godel/pkg/products/v2v2.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/palantir/godel/v2v2.159.0direct
Gogithub.com/palantir/pkg/cobracliv1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cheggaaa/pb/v3v3.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dsnet/compressv0.0.2-0.20210315054119-f66993602bf5indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/snappyv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/pgzipv1.2.6indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/prettyv0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.23indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/mholt/archiver/v3v3.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/nmiyake/pkg/dirsv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nmiyake/pkg/errorstringerv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/nwaples/rardecodev1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/otiai10/copyv1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/otiai10/mintv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/palantir/pkgv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/palantir/pkg/matcherv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/palantir/pkg/pkgpathv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/palantir/pkg/specdirv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pierrec/lz4/v4v4.1.27indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/termie/go-shutilv0.0.0-20140729215957-bcacb06fecaeindirect
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.15indirect
Gogithub.com/vividcortex/ewmav1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xi2/xzv0.0.0-20171230120015-48954b6210f8indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.48.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/check.v1v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6cindirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.