Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 19:58 UTC

patchstack / connect

Patchstack connector for JavaScript applications. Scans your lockfile and reports installed packages to Patchstack for vulnerability monitoring.

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

patchstack/connect holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PatchstackOrganization
25 followers5 public repossince May 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@patchstack/connect0.3.214,203324 days agopatchstacksecurityvulnerabilitycvenpm-auditscadependency-scanning

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18Commit volume88 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year88
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases34 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count34
latest_release_tagv0.3.21
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases0.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.3/80Monthly downloads4,203 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@patchstack/connect
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,203
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 50% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.5
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
25.8/30PR acceptance85/99 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs85
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
10.2/25Owner reach25 followers of patchstack
16/25Track record5 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers25
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginpatchstack
public_repos5
account_age_days1,889
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history32 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@patchstack/connect
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscve, dependency-scanning, nodejs, npm, patchstack, sca, security, typescript, vulnerability
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities38 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories8
affected_packages2
assessed_packages135
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 135 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,836
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesbun.lockb, package-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/134 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes32,912
source_files_sampled134
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
5contributors
88commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
34releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • deps.dev does not index npm:@patchstack/connect@0.3.21; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 19:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities38 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 135

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 135 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.7indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.3indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/node20.19.41indirect
npm@vitest/expect3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/mocker3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/runner3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/spy3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/utils3.2.6indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbundle-require5.1.0indirect
npmcac6.7.14indirect
npmchai5.3.3indirect
npmcheck-error2.1.3indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmconfbox0.1.8indirect
npmconsola3.4.2indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-eql5.0.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer1.7.0indirect
npmesbuild0.27.7indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfix-dts-default-cjs-exports1.0.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmjoycon3.1.1indirect
npmjs-tokens9.0.1indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.3indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmload-tsconfig0.2.5indirect
npmlodash4.17.11indirect
npmloupe3.2.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmlly1.8.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpathval2.0.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpirates4.0.7indirect
npmpkg-types1.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.14indirect
npmpostcss-load-config6.0.1indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmrollup4.60.3indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.7.6indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env3.10.0indirect
npmstrip-literal3.1.0indirect
npmsucrase3.35.1indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec0.3.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.16indirect
npmtinypool1.1.1indirect
npmtinyrainbow2.0.0indirect
npmtinyspy4.0.4indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmtsup8.5.1indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmufo1.6.4indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmvite7.3.6indirect
npmvite-node3.2.4indirect
npmvitest3.2.6indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 135 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
lodash4.17.11indirectcritical74.18.0
esbuild0.27.7indirectlow10.28.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.