Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-18 04:51 UTC

patriksimek / vm2

Advanced vm/sandbox for Node.js

JavaScriptMIT★ 4,109 stars⑂ 332 forkssince Jan 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

patriksimek/vm2 holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (67/100). It was last updated 34 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Patrik SimekPersonal account
201 followers48 public repossince Aug 2011Make (formerly @integromat)

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmvm23.12.24,707,4678339 days agosandboxprisonjailvmalcatrazcontextify

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 34 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 170 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year170
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push34
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 39 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~14.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count38
latest_release_tagv3.12.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases14.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
58.6/60Stars — 4,109 stars
21/25Forks — 332 forks
8.9/15Watchers — 41 watchers
Inputs used
forks332
stars4,109
watchers41
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 4,707,467 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesvm2
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,707,467
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 35 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled35
top_contributor_share0.524
How it's scored
40.8/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
22.1/30PR acceptance — 114/155 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs114
open_issues12
closed_issues406
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.971
closed_unmerged_prs41
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.6/25Owner reach — 201 followers of patriksimek
24.3/25Track record — 48 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers201
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginpatriksimek
public_repos48
account_age_days5,534
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 39 days ago
20/20Version history — 83 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesvm2
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish39

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjavascript, sandbox, vm, security, node-js
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

77Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:vm2@3.12.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,422
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 40 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.4
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 4/120 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes426,490
source_files_sampled120
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

4,109GitHub stars
35contributors
170commits, last 12 months
34days since last push
38releases
1bus factor
12open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 332 ⇿
0Stars
332Forks
38Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037531252015-022020-122026-09
Major 0Minor 4Patch 34

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 04:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 31 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
8Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmacorn^8.15.0package.json
npmacorn-walk^8.3.4package.json
All dependencies 125

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 123 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmacorn8.15.0direct
npmacorn-walk8.3.4direct
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.1indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.21.1indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.4.1indirect
npm@eslint/core0.16.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.3.1indirect
npm@eslint/js9.38.0indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema2.1.7indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.4.0indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.6indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.18indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdiff8.0.4indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint9.38.0indirect
npmeslint-scope8.4.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.1indirect
npmespree10.4.0indirect
npmesquery1.6.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals14.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlru-cache11.3.5indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmocha12.0.0-beta-9.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmreaddirp5.0.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments5.0.3indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmworkerpool10.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:vm2@3.12.2 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.