Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 23:15 UTC

pecigonzalo / terraform-provider-kafka

Terraform Kafka Provider

GoMPL-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindApplicationLibraryhow this is determined

pecigonzalo/terraform-provider-kafka holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Gonzalo PeciPersonal account
103 followers415 public repossince Nov 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/pecigonzalo/terraform-provider-kafkav0.5.3-959 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
13.3/18Commit volume — 29 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year29
human_commit_share0.33
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 9 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 59 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~170.1 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tagv0.5.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release59
mean_days_between_releases170.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars8
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
15.1/30PR acceptance — 73/145 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs73
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs72
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.5/25Owner reach — 103 followers of pecigonzalo
25/25Track record — 415 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers103
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginpecigonzalo
public_repos415
account_age_days4,311
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 59 days ago
20/20Version history — 9 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/pecigonzalo/terraform-provider-kafka
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish59

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://registry.terraform.io/providers/pecigonzalo/kafka/latest
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraform-provider, kafka, terraform, aws, msk, aws-msk
has_wikino
homepagehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/pecigonzalo/kafka/latest
docs_sitehttps://registry.terraform.io/providers/pecigonzalo/kafka/latest
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories13
affected_packages5
assessed_packages141
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 141 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27.5/40Legible commit history — 17 of 33 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.515
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 67 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.67
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes17,076
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars
1contributors
29commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2024-09-02: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 8 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 8 ★ / 4 ⇿
8Stars
4Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2024-09-02. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

024688412022-112023-102024-09
Major 0Minor 4Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 23:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests19 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained29 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.25.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-testingv1.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ory/dockertest/v3v3.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/segmentio/kafka-gov0.4.51go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/segmentio/topicctlv1.23.1go.mod
All dependencies 141

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 132 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-docsv0.25.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-testingv1.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/ory/dockertest/v3v3.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/segmentio/kafka-gov0.4.51direct
Gogithub.com/segmentio/topicctlv1.23.1direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/armon/go-radixv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.39.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.31.8indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.18.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/iniv1.8.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ec2v1.253.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/secretsmanagerv1.39.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.29.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.34.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.38.4indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/azure/go-ansitermv0.0.0-20250102033503-faa5f7b0171cindirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/speakeasyv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4v4.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/continuityv0.4.5indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefs/pkgv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/referencev0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/cliv29.6.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connectionsv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-unitsv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yamlv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/shlexv0.0.0-20191202100458-e7afc7fbc510indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/cliv1.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-checkpointv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-ctyv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-pluginv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.8indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-uuidv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hc-installv0.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/logutilsv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-execv0.25.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.27.3-0.20260213134036-298b8f6b673aindirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2v2.40.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-registry-addressv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-svchostv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/yamuxv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/huandu/xstringsv1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergov0.3.15indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.15.9indirect
Gogithub.com/kunde21/markdownfmt/v3v3.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/goutilsv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/sprig/v3v3.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructurev1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalkv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/docker-image-specv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/moby/apiv1.55.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/moby/clientv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/userv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/termv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/nvveen/gottyv0.0.0-20120604004816-cd527374f1e5indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/runv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv0.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/runcv1.3.6indirect
Gogithub.com/pierrec/lz4/v4v4.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/posener/completev1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/samuel/go-zookeeperv0.0.0-20190923202752-2cc03de413daindirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/kafka-go/sasl/aws_msk_iam_v2v0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpackv4.0.4+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xdg-go/pbkdf2v1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xdg-go/scramv1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/xdg-go/stringprepv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointerv0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreferencev0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschemav1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/yuin/goldmark-metav1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.18.1indirect
Gogo.abhg.dev/goldmark/frontmatterv0.2.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.60.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230626212559-97b1e661b5dfindirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/appenginev1.6.8indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20230410155749-daa745c078e1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 141 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.82.0indirectcritical51.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/yuin/goldmarkv1.7.7indirectunknown11.7.17
go.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirectunknown11.44.0
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.