Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 21:34 UTC

peterrichards-lr / lfr-tunnel

A secure, self-hosted tunneling solution for Liferay instances and client extensions, routing traffic from wildcard subdomains to local developer environments with automated SSL and offline support.

Go · HTML · JavaScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

peterrichards-lr/lfr-tunnel holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (43/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Peter RichardsPersonal account
18 followers94 public repossince Mar 2021Liferay

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume542 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year542
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases88 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count88
latest_release_tagv1.39.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases0

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.973
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
29.2/30PR acceptance412/424 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs412
open_issues0
closed_issues244
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
9.2/25Owner reach18 followers of peterrichards-lr
23.7/25Track record94 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginpeterrichards-lr
public_repos94
account_age_days1,959
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://lfr-demo.se
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicschisel, go, liferay, reverse-proxy, sales-engineering, tunnel
has_wikino
homepagehttps://lfr-demo.se
docs_sitehttps://lfr-demo.se
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.8

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.agents/AGENTS.md, gemini.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files.agents/AGENTS.md, gemini.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes74,128
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingui/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsui/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes4/186 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes595,600
source_files_sampled186
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
542commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
88releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 21:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3v3.20.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/jedisct1/go-minisignv0.0.0-20260527172527-a09352b57a22go.mod
Gogithub.com/jpillora/chiselv1.11.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.53.0go.mod
Gosoftware.sslmate.com/src/go-pkcs12v0.7.3go.mod
npmaxios^1.18.1ui/package.json
npmchart.js^4.5.1ui/package.json
npmdriver.js^1.8.0ui/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7ui/package.json
npmreact-chartjs-2^5.3.1ui/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7ui/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.18.1ui/package.json
All dependencies 166

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 149 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-oidc/v3v3.20.0direct
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3direct
Gogithub.com/jedisct1/go-minisignv0.0.0-20260527172527-a09352b57a22direct
Gogithub.com/jpillora/chiselv1.11.8direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gomodernc.org/sqlitev1.53.0direct
Gosoftware.sslmate.com/src/go-pkcs12v0.7.3direct
npmaxios1.18.1direct
npmchart.js4.5.1direct
npmdriver.js1.8.0direct
npmreact19.2.7direct
npmreact-chartjs-25.3.1direct
npmreact-dom19.2.7direct
npmreact-router-dom7.18.1direct
Gogithub.com/andrew-d/go-termutilv0.0.0-20150726205930-009166a695a2indirect
Gogithub.com/armon/go-socks5v0.0.0-20160902184237-e75332964ef5indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-webgpu/goffiv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/godbus/dbus/v5v5.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gogpu/systrayv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jpillora/ansiv1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/jpillora/backoffv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jpillora/requestlogv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jpillora/sizestrv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ncruces/go-strftimev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/remyoudompheng/bigfftv0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daecindirect
Gogithub.com/tomasen/realipv0.0.0-20180522021738-f0c99a92ddceindirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.38.0indirect
Gomodernc.org/libcv1.73.4indirect
Gomodernc.org/mathutilv1.7.1indirect
Gomodernc.org/memoryv1.11.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@kurkle/color0.3.4indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-x641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm641.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc1.74.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.74.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.60.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.61.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/node24.13.3indirect
npm@types/node25.9.3indirect
npm@types/node25.9.5indirect
npm@types/react19.2.17indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.3indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.0.3indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmautoprefixer10.5.4indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.10.43indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.6indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001806indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcookie1.1.1indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.393indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.16.0indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmfraction.js5.3.4indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.51indirect
npmoxlint1.74.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.60.0indirect
npmplaywright1.61.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.60.0indirect
npmplaywright-core1.61.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.19indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmproxy-from-env2.1.0indirect
npmreact-router7.18.1indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmscheduler0.27.0indirect
npmset-cookie-parser2.7.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3indirect
npmvite8.1.5indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.