Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-30 12:25 UTC

petmal / MindTrial

MindTrial: Evaluate and compare AI language models (LLMs) on text-based tasks with optional file/image attachments and tool use. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Mistral AI, xAI, Alibaba, Moonshot AI, OpenRouter), custom tasks in YAML, and HTML/CSV/JSON reports.

GoMPL-2.0★ 17 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Mar 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

petmal/MindTrial holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (37/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Petr MalikPersonal account
3 followers5 public repossince May 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/petmal/mindtrialv0.22.1-524 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence32/52 weeks with commits
16.7/18Commit volume71 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year71
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year32
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases51 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~10.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count51
latest_release_tagv0.22.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases10.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.5/60Stars17 stars
5/25Forks5 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars17
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
7.5/30PR acceptance1/4 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
4.3/25Owner reach3 followers of petmal
17.7/25Track record5 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginpetmal
public_repos5
account_age_days4,864
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history52 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/petmal/mindtrial
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-benchmark, ai-evaluation-tools, ai-model-comparison, ai-tool, anthropic, deepseek, google-gemini-ai, language-models-ai, llm-benchmarking, llm-comparison, llm-evaluation-framework, openai, opensource, artificial-intelligence-projects, grok-ai, mistral-ai, xai, qwen, moonshot-ai, openrouter
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: github.com/docker/docker v28.5.2+incompatible (high 7.2)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.9/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 155 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories22
affected_packages4
assessed_packages102
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 102 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes13/1,209 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes194,407
source_files_sampled1,209
oversized_source_files13
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

17GitHub stars
1contributors
71commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
51releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
18Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512025-122026-032026-06
Major 0Minor 6Patch 12
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-30 12:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocharm.land/bubbles/v2v2.2.0go.mod
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.9go.mod
Gocharm.land/lipgloss/v2v2.0.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefsv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv28.5.2+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/invopop/jsonschemav0.14.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/kaptinlin/jsonrepairv0.2.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/oklog/ulid/v2v2.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.52.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/sethvargo/go-retryv0.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.69.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/validator.v2v2.0.1go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.66.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/cohesion-org/deepseek-gov1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.4.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260820142414-ca536658362ego.mod
All dependencies 102

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 77 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocharm.land/bubbles/v2v2.2.0direct
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.9direct
Gocharm.land/lipgloss/v2v2.0.6direct
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.66.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.8direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2direct
Gogithub.com/cohesion-org/deepseek-gov1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefsv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv28.5.2+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.3direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/invopop/jsonschemav0.14.0direct
Gogithub.com/kaptinlin/jsonrepairv0.2.8direct
Gogithub.com/oklog/ulid/v2v2.1.2direct
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.52.0direct
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.35.1direct
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.3direct
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/sethvargo/go-retryv0.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260820142414-ca536658362edirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.69.0direct
Gogopkg.in/validator.v2v2.0.1direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.123.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.20.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/bahlo/generic-list-gov0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/buger/jsonparserv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/harmonicav0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/ultravioletv0.0.0-20260811164956-006e29f97886indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termiosv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/windowsv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefs/pkgv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/containerd/logv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/referencev0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connectionsv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/go-unitsv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.13indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/localesv0.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-playground/universal-translatorv0.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.17indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/leodido/go-urnv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.27indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/docker-image-specv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/sys/atomicwriterv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/termv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/morikuni/aecv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/ollama/ollamav0.24.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pb33f/ordered-map/v2v2.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/sahilm/fuzzyv0.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/standard-webhooks/standard-webhooks/librariesv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/objxv0.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/matchv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/prettyv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/sjsonv1.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/wk8/go-ordered-map/v2v2.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.69.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v4v4.0.0-rc.6indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.276.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260622175928-b703f567277dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260622175928-b703f567277dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.81.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogotest.tools/v3v3.5.2indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 102 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.81.1indirectcritical21.82.1
github.com/docker/dockerv28.5.2+incompatibledirecthigh92.0.0-beta.14
github.com/ollama/ollamav0.24.0indirectunknown9
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown20.55.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.