Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-26 12:33 UTC

pi-engine / pi

Multi-tenant application development engine for cloud ready SaaS platform.

PHP · HTMLNo license detected★ 246 stars⑂ 120 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗

pi-engine/pi holds a health index of 22 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (59/100) and lowest on Vitality (18/100). It was last updated 1406 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

22
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

22
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Pi EngineOrganization
15 followers24 public repossince Feb 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 1,406 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1,406
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 10 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,098 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~279.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagv2.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,098
mean_days_between_releases279.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.8/60Stars — 246 stars
17.3/25Forks — 120 forks
9.4/15Watchers — 51 watchers
Inputs used
forks120
stars246
watchers51
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 50% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.502
How it's scored
36.9/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
28.6/30PR acceptance — 1,143/1,197 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,143
open_issues61
closed_issues440
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.878
closed_unmerged_prs54
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.7/25Owner reach — 15 followers of pi-engine
22.2/25Track record — 24 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpi-engine
public_repos24
account_age_days5,739

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://www.piengine.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspi-engine, php, sso, zend-framework, zend, php7, cms, saas, multi-tenant, multi-tenant-applications, laminas
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://www.piengine.org
docs_sitehttp://www.piengine.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.5
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier75
security_posture_after_multiplier19
security_posture_before_jurisdiction25
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.
How it's scored
12.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.4.0 (high 8.0)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,614 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories14
affected_packages1
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages77
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 77 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

25At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.2/40Legible commit history — 21 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.21
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 2/1,364 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes739,894
source_files_sampled1,364
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

246GitHub stars
13contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,406days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
61open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'pi/pi' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 120 ⇿
0Stars
120Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012011462012-122019-082026-05
Major 0Minor 2Patch 2

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-26 12:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 66
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistlaminas/laminas-authentication*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-barcode*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-cache*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-captcha*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-code*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-config*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-console*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-crypt*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-db*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-di*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-dom*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-escaper*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-eventmanager*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-feed*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-file*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-filter*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-form*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-http*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-i18n*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-i18n-resources*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-inputfilter*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-json*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-loader*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-log*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-mail*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-math*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-memory*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-mime*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-modulemanager*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-mvc2.6.3composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-navigation*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-paginator*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-permissions-acl*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-permissions-rbac*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-progressbar*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-serializer*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-server*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-servicemanager*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-session*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-soap*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-stdlib*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-tag*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-test*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-text*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-uri*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-validator*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-view2.5.3p2composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-xmlrpc*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-dependency-plugin*composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-recaptcha3.1.0composer.json
Packagistimagine/imagine*composer.json
Packagistvoku/anti-xss*composer.json
Packagistmatthiasmullie/minify*composer.json
Packagistnguyenhiep/tiny-html-minifier*composer.json
Packagisthybridauth/hybridauth*composer.json
Packagistrobthree/twofactorauth*composer.json
Packagistspipu/html2pdf*composer.json
Packagisttecnickcom/tcpdf*composer.json
Packagiststripe/stripe-php*composer.json
Packagistgeoip2/geoip2*composer.json
Packagistphayes/geophp*composer.json
Packagistemcconville/google-map-polyline-encoding-tool*composer.json
Packagistraiym/instagram-php-scraper*composer.json
Packagistbigbluebutton/bigbluebutton-api-php*composer.json
Packagistvonage/client2.*composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.4.0composer.json
All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 66 direct and 14 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbigbluebutton/bigbluebutton-api-php—direct
Packagistemcconville/google-map-polyline-encoding-tool—direct
Packagistgeoip2/geoip2—direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.4.0direct
Packagisthybridauth/hybridauth—direct
Packagistimagine/imagine—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-authentication—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-barcode—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-cache—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-captcha—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-code—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-config—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-console—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-crypt—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-db—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-dependency-plugin—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-di—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-dom—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-escaper—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-eventmanager—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-feed—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-file—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-filter—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-form—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-http—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-i18n—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-i18n-resources—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-inputfilter—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-json—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-loader—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-log—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-mail—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-math—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-memory—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-mime—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-modulemanager—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-mvc2.6.3direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-navigation—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-paginator—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-permissions-acl—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-permissions-rbac—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-progressbar—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-recaptcha3.1.0direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-serializer—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-server—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-servicemanager—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-session—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-soap—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-stdlib—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-tag—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-test—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-text—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-uri—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-validator—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-view—direct
Packagistlaminas/laminas-xmlrpc—direct
Packagistmatthiasmullie/minify—direct
Packagistnguyenhiep/tiny-html-minifier—direct
Packagistphayes/geophp—direct
Packagistraiym/instagram-php-scraper—direct
Packagistrobthree/twofactorauth—direct
Packagistspipu/html2pdf—direct
Packagiststripe/stripe-php—direct
Packagisttecnickcom/tcpdf—direct
Packagistvoku/anti-xss—direct
Packagistvonage/client—direct
Packagistext-ctype—indirect
Packagistext-fileinfo—indirect
Packagistext-gd—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-mbstring—indirect
Packagistext-pdo—indirect
Packagistext-spl—indirect
Packagistlib-curl—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphp-ffmpeg/php-ffmpeg—indirect
Packagistphpmailer/phpmailer—indirect
Packagistphpoffice/phpspreadsheet—indirect
Packagistphpseclib/phpseclib—indirect
Packagistpi/pi—indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 77 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.4.0directhigh148.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.