Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 15:36 UTC

pirsch-analytics / pirsch-js-sdk

JavaScript Client SDK for Pirsch Analytics.

TypeScriptMIT★ 27 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗

#pirsch #client #sdk #javascript #analytics

pirsch-analytics/pirsch-js-sdk holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (67/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated 44 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Pirsch AnalyticsOrganization

81 followers24 public repossince Oct 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	pirsch-sdk	2.10.1	22,241	54	44 days ago	pirsch analytics client sdk api

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

31At Risk

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 44 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18	Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

commits_last_year	6
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	44
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 40 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 44 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~114.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	40
latest_release_tag	v2.10.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	44
mean_days_between_releases	114.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk

How it's scored

23/60	Stars — 27 stars
7/25	Forks — 8 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	8
stars	27
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

72Good

How it's scored

58/80	Monthly downloads — 22,241 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	pirsch-sdk
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	22,241
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits
6.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	5
top_contributor_share	0.529

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.5/30	PR acceptance — 15/17 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	15
open_issues	0
closed_issues	17
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
13.8/25	Owner reach — 81 followers of pirsch-analytics
22/25	Track record — 24 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	81
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	pirsch-analytics
public_repos	24
account_age_days	2,167

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 44 days ago
20/20	Version history — 54 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	pirsch-sdk
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

43Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

22At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc.cjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://pirsch.io
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	pirsch, client, sdk, javascript, analytics
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://pirsch.io
docs_site	https://pirsch.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

30At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3/7.5	Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
4.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	32
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:pirsch-sdk@2.10.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 32 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

10Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.1/40	Legible commit history — 19 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.19
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

36Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc.cjs
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/9 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	26,711
source_files_sampled	9
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

27GitHub stars

5contributors

6commits, last 12 months

44days since last push

40releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿

0Stars

8Forks

24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 8Patch 12

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10

3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 15:36 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
4	Maintained	4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
6	Vulnerabilities	4 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@types/node	`^26.1.2`	package.json
npm	axios	`^1.18.1`	package.json

All dependencies 154

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 152 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@types/node	`26.1.2`	direct
npm	axios	`1.18.1`	direct
npm	@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap	`1.2.6`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.10.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/css-tree	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.6`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/parser	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/project-service	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/scope-manager	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/type-utils	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/types	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/utils	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys	`8.65.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.18.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.15.0`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.11.5`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.7`	indirect
npm	builtin-modules	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001806`	indirect
npm	change-case	`5.4.4`	indirect
npm	ci-info	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	convert-hrtime	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	core-js-compat	`3.49.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-indent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.397`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.8.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`10.1.8`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-unicorn	`72.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up-simple	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	function-timeout	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.8.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	identifier-regex	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ignore	`7.0.5`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	indent-string	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-builtin-module	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-identifier	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsesc	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	make-asynchronous	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mdn-data	`2.29.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.6`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.51`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.3`	indirect
npm	p-event	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-timeout	`6.1.4`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	pluralize	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	quote-js-string	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	regjsparser	`0.13.2`	indirect
npm	reserved-identifiers	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	strip-indent	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	super-regex	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	time-span	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	ts-api-utils	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`4.41.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	web-worker	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:pirsch-sdk@2.10.1 pulls in 32 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records