Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 23:13 UTC

plaid / plaid-node

Node bindings for Plaid

TypeScriptMIT★ 586 stars⑂ 189 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗

plaid/plaid-node holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (94/100) and lowest on Vitality (54/100). It was last updated 15 days ago. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PlaidOrganization · verified domain
1,039 followers68 public repossince Feb 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmplaid47.0.03,982,43118915 days agoplaidplaid.com

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 15 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume — 32 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push15
active_weeks_last_year15
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,834 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~241.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tag9.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,834
mean_days_between_releases241.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.9/60Stars — 586 stars
19/25Forks — 189 forks
10/15Watchers — 65 watchers
Inputs used
forks189
stars586
watchers65
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 3,982,431 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesplaid
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,982,431
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

94Exceptional · 23% of overall
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor — 6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 14% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 80 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 21 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled80
top_contributor_share0.137
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
20.5/30PR acceptance — 324/474 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs324
open_issues7
closed_issues221
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.969
closed_unmerged_prs150
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
21.7/25Owner reach — 1,039 followers of plaid
25/25Track record — 68 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,039
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginplaid
public_repos68
account_age_days4,963

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20Version history — 189 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesplaid
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://plaid.com/docs
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://plaid.com/docs
docs_sitehttps://plaid.com/docs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6/7.5Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 58 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages30
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:plaid@47.0.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 30 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://plaid.com/llms.txt)
29.9/40Legible commit history — 56 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://plaid.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.56
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
53/55Manageable file sizes — 1/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes4,641,071
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

586GitHub stars
80contributors
32commits, last 12 months
15days since last push
6releases
6bus factor
7open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 189 ⇿
0Stars
189Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020018842014-012020-042026-08
Major 2Minor 3Patch 0

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 23:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities58 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmaxios^1.7.4package.json
All dependencies 127

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 126 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmaxios1.7.9direct
npm@types/chai4.2.22indirect
npm@types/mocha8.2.3indirect
npm@types/node14.17.27indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarg4.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchai4.3.4indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcheck-error1.0.2indirect
npmchokidar3.5.3indirect
npmcli1.0.1indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconsole-browserify1.1.0indirect
npmcore-util-is1.0.3indirect
npmcreate-require1.1.1indirect
npmdate-now0.1.4indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdeep-eql3.0.1indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdiff4.0.2indirect
npmdiff5.0.0indirect
npmdom-serializer0.2.2indirect
npmdomelementtype1.3.1indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler2.3.0indirect
npmdomutils1.5.1indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmentities1.0.0indirect
npmentities2.2.0indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmexit0.1.2indirect
npmexpect.js0.3.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.15.9indirect
npmform-data4.0.0indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-func-name2.0.2indirect
npmglob7.2.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmhtmlparser23.8.3indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisarray0.0.1indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjshint2.13.6indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmmake-error1.3.6indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch3.0.8indirect
npmminimatch5.0.1indirect
npmmocha10.2.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.3indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpathval1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmproxy-from-env1.1.0indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreadable-stream1.1.14indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.20indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring_decoder0.10.31indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments1.0.4indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-node9.1.1indirect
npmtype-detect4.0.8indirect
npmtypescript4.1.3indirect
npmworkerpool6.2.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.4indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyn3.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:plaid@47.0.0 pulls in 30 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.