Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 01:21 UTC

pleme-io / shigoto

Typed job-system primitive (仕事 — work/job/task) — the seventh foundational pleme-io tier. Comprehensive typed surface (Job + JobId + JobPhase 10-state FSM + JobKind + Dag + Scheduler + Budget tree + RetryPolicy + Gate + TransitionEmitter + TickReceipt). Bootstrap consumer is tend. Spec — theory/SHIGOTO.md.

RustMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

pleme-io/shigoto holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (35/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

pleme-ioOrganization
6 followers354 public repossince Sep 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.ioshigoto0.1.164461619 days ago
crates.ioshigoto-dag0.1.167,8701619 days ago
crates.ioshigoto-fsm0.1.16564819 days ago
crates.ioshigoto-emit0.1.161,1561619 days ago
crates.ioshigoto-gate0.1.161,1751619 days ago
crates.ioshigoto-rank0.1.16496919 days ago
crates.ioshigoto-test0.1.16471619 days ago
crates.ioshigoto-retry0.1.161,2911619 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 19 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 109 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year109
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push19
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 16 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 19 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv0.1.16
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release19
mean_days_between_releases9.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54.9/80Monthly downloads — 13,045 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesshigoto, shigoto-dag, shigoto-fsm, shigoto-emit, shigoto-gate, shigoto-rank, shigoto-test, shigoto-retry
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads40,825
monthly_downloads13,045
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of pleme-io
25/25Track record — 354 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpleme-io
public_repos354
account_age_days2,554

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 19 days ago
20/20Version history — 16 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesshigoto, shigoto-dag, shigoto-fsm, shigoto-emit, shigoto-gate, shigoto-rank, shigoto-test, shigoto-retry
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish19

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), shigoto-budget/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-fsm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-gate/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-rank/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-retry/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-test/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-types/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/shigoto
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdag, job-system, pleme-io, reconciler, rust, scheduler, state-machine, typed
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/shigoto
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages79
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:shigoto@0.1.16 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 79 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 87 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, shigoto-budget/Cargo.toml, shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), shigoto-budget/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-fsm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-gate/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-rank/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-retry/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-test/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto-types/Cargo.toml ([lints]), shigoto/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, shigoto-budget/Cargo.toml, shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml, shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml, shigoto-fsm/Cargo.toml, shigoto-gate/Cargo.toml, shigoto-rank/Cargo.toml, shigoto-retry/Cargo.toml, shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml, shigoto-test/Cargo.toml, shigoto-types/Cargo.toml, shigoto/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
52.6/55Manageable file sizes — 1/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes63,217
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
109commits, last 12 months
19days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 01:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 55
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto-budget/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—shigoto-budget/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—shigoto-budget/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml
crates.iopetgraph—shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—shigoto-dag/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—shigoto-emit/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto-gate/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-dag—shigoto-gate/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—shigoto-rank/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto-retry/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—shigoto-retry/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-dag—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-budget—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-retry—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-gate—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-emit—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—shigoto-scheduler/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto-test/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-scheduler—shigoto-test/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—shigoto-test/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—shigoto-test/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—shigoto-test/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioschemars—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake3—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iogen-platform—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.iogen-types—shigoto-types/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-types—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-dag—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-scheduler—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-budget—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-rank—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-fsm—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-retry—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-gate—shigoto/Cargo.toml
crates.ioshigoto-emit—shigoto/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 100

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 86 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow1.0.102direct
crates.ioasync-trait0.1.89direct
crates.ioblake31.8.5direct
crates.iochrono0.4.44direct
crates.iogen-platform0.1.34direct
crates.iogen-types0.1.34direct
crates.iohex0.4.3direct
crates.iopetgraph0.6.5direct
crates.ioschemars0.8.22direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150direct
crates.iothiserror2.0.18direct
crates.iotokio1.52.3direct
crates.iotracing0.1.44direct
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioarrayref0.3.9indirect
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.6indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.11.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocc1.2.62indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioconstant_time_eq0.4.2indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.3.0indirect
crates.iodyn-clone1.0.20indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofixedbitset0.4.2indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogen-macros0.1.34indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.2indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.65indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.3.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioinventory0.3.24indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.99indirect
crates.ioleb128fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolog0.4.30indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.1indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.ioschemars_derive0.8.22indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive_internals0.29.1indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.117indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.0indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.31indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.36indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.3+wasi-0.2.9indirect
crates.iowasip30.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.122indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.122indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.122indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.122indirect
crates.iowasm-encoder0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasm-metadata0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasmparser0.244.0indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-core0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust-macro0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-component0.244.0indirect
crates.iowit-parser0.244.0indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:shigoto@0.1.16 pulls in 79 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.