Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 16:49 UTC

pmh1314520 / WebRPA

A powerful no-code automation tool. Build workflows via drag-and-drop modules for web scraping, form filling and automated testing. | 一款功能强大的自动化工具,通过拖拽模块的方式快速构建自动化工作流,无需编写任何代码即可实现网页数据采集、表单填写、自动化测试等任务。【QQ交流群:115069513】

Python · TypeScriptCustom license★ 1,806 stars⑂ 179 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceNetwork serviceDesktop applicationhow this is determined

pmh1314520/WebRPA holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 2 days ago.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

青云制作_彭明航Personal account
24 followers8 public repossince Dec 2022Yancheng Institute of Technology

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume589 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year589
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases40 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~15.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count40
latest_release_tagv2.4.23
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases15.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
52.8/60Stars1,806 stars
18.8/25Forks179 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks179
stars1,806
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues42
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.1/25Owner reach24 followers of pmh1314520
14.1/25Track record8 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers24
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginpmh1314520
public_repos8
account_age_days1,301
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://rpa.pmhs.top
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics17 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsddddocr, easyocr, express-js, face-recognition, fastapi, ffmpeg, node-js, opencv, pandoc, playwright, pyautogui, python3, react, socket-io, typescript, uvicorn, vite
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://rpa.pmhs.top
docs_sitehttps://rpa.pmhs.top
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities139 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingfrontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json)
52.3/55Manageable file sizes31/641 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes475,168
source_files_sampled641
oversized_source_files31

Key facts

1,806GitHub stars
-contributors
589commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
40releases
-bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Contributor list unavailable
  • Could not fetch npm package 'framework-hub' from its registry
  • Could not fetch npm package 'webrpa-launcher' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.1 / 10
2.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 16:49 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities139 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 36
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmexpress^4.18.2frameworkHub/package.json
npmcors^2.8.5frameworkHub/package.json
npmhelmet^7.1.0frameworkHub/package.json
npmexpress-rate-limit^7.1.5frameworkHub/package.json
npmexpress-validator^7.0.1frameworkHub/package.json
npmsql.js^1.10.3frameworkHub/package.json
npmuuid^9.0.1frameworkHub/package.json
npmws^8.16.0frameworkHub/package.json
npmxss^1.0.14frameworkHub/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.7.0frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.1.15frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu^2.1.4frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.2.6frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-switch^1.2.6frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tabs^1.1.13frontend/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/api^2.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@xyflow/react^12.10.0frontend/package.json
npmaxios^1.13.4frontend/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1frontend/package.json
npmdompurify^3.2.7frontend/package.json
npmelkjs^0.11.1frontend/package.json
npmframer-motion^12.34.4frontend/package.json
npmhtml2canvas^1.4.1frontend/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.562.0frontend/package.json
npmmarked^18.0.4frontend/package.json
npmmermaid^11.12.2frontend/package.json
npmnanoid^5.1.6frontend/package.json
npmpinyin-pro^3.26.0frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.2.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-resizable-panels^4.0.15frontend/package.json
npmsocket.io-client^4.8.3frontend/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.4.0frontend/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.9frontend/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/api^2.0.0launcher/package.json
npmvue^3.4.21launcher/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.