Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-15 07:39 UTC

pmndrs / ecctrl

🕹️ A physics-driven controller toolkit for React Three Fiber + Rapier

TypeScriptMIT★ 806 stars⑂ 100 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

pmndrs/ecctrl holds a health index of 45 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (63/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (31/100). It was last updated 38 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

45
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

45
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PoimandresOrganization
9,985 followers102 public repossince Dec 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

51Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 38 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume — 3 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push38
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 2 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 38 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv2.0.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release38
mean_days_between_releases20.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
47.1/60Stars — 806 stars
16.6/25Forks — 100 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks100
stars806
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.5/80Monthly downloads — 17,179 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesecctrl
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads17,179
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.946
How it's scored
19.5/42Issue resolution — 46% of issues closed
7.2/30PR acceptance — 7/29 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs7
open_issues54
closed_issues47
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.465
closed_unmerged_prs22
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 9,985 followers of pmndrs
25/25Track record — 102 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers9,985
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginpmndrs
public_repos102
account_age_days2,864

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 38 days ago
20/20Version history — 102 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesecctrl
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish38

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

31At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:ecctrl@2.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38.2/40Legible commit history — 68 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.716
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 95
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/49 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes54,440
source_files_sampled49
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

806GitHub stars
5contributors
3commits, last 12 months
38days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
54open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 100 ⇿
0Stars
100Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801009952023-092025-032026-10
Major 0Minor 0Patch 2

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.2 / 10
2.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-15 07:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmzustand^5.0.14package.json
All dependencies 202

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 199 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmzustand3.7.2direct
npmzustand4.5.7direct
npmzustand5.0.14direct
npm@babel/runtime7.28.3indirect
npm@dimforge/rapier3d-compat0.12.0indirect
npm@dimforge/rapier3d-compat0.19.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.10.0indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.1indirect
npm@floating-ui/core1.7.3indirect
npm@floating-ui/dom1.7.4indirect
npm@floating-ui/react-dom2.1.6indirect
npm@floating-ui/utils0.2.10indirect
npm@mediapipe/tasks-vision0.10.17indirect
npm@monogrid/gainmap-js3.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.133.0indirect
npm@radix-ui/primitive1.1.3indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-arrow1.1.7indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-compose-refs1.1.2indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-context1.1.2indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-dismissable-layer1.1.11indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-id1.1.1indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-popper1.2.8indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-portal1.1.10indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-portal1.1.9indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-presence1.1.5indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-primitive2.1.3indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-primitive2.1.4indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-slot1.2.3indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-slot1.2.4indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip1.2.8indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-use-callback-ref1.1.1indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-use-controllable-state1.2.2indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-use-effect-event0.0.2indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-use-escape-keydown1.1.1indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-use-layout-effect1.1.1indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-use-rect1.1.1indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-use-size1.1.1indirect
npm@radix-ui/react-visually-hidden1.2.3indirect
npm@radix-ui/rect1.1.1indirect
npm@react-three/drei10.7.7indirect
npm@react-three/fiber9.6.1indirect
npm@react-three/rapier2.2.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@stitches/react1.2.8indirect
npm@tweenjs/tween.js23.1.3indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/draco3d1.4.10indirect
npm@types/offscreencanvas2019.7.3indirect
npm@types/react19.2.16indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.3indirect
npm@types/react-reconciler0.28.9indirect
npm@types/stats.js0.17.4indirect
npm@types/three0.179.0indirect
npm@types/webxr0.5.23indirect
npm@use-gesture/core10.3.1indirect
npm@use-gesture/react10.3.1indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-basic-ssl2.3.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react6.0.2indirect
npm@webgpu/types0.1.64indirect
npmassign-symbols1.0.0indirect
npmattr-accept2.2.5indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmcamera-controls3.1.0indirect
npmcolord2.9.3indirect
npmcross-env7.0.3indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdetect-gpu5.0.70indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdraco3d1.5.7indirect
npmesbuild0.27.1indirect
npmextend-shallow2.0.1indirect
npmextend-shallow3.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfflate0.6.10indirect
npmfflate0.8.2indirect
npmfile-selector0.5.0indirect
npmfor-in1.0.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-value2.0.6indirect
npmglsl-noise0.0.0indirect
npmhls.js1.6.11indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npmimmediate3.0.6indirect
npmis-extendable0.1.1indirect
npmis-extendable1.0.1indirect
npmis-plain-object2.0.4indirect
npmis-promise2.2.2indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisobject3.0.1indirect
npmits-fine2.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmleva0.10.1indirect
npmlie3.3.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmloose-envify1.4.0indirect
npmmaath0.10.8indirect
npmmerge-value1.0.0indirect
npmmeshline3.3.1indirect
npmmeshoptimizer0.22.0indirect
npmmixin-deep1.3.2indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmpotpack1.0.2indirect
npmpromise-worker-transferable1.0.4indirect
npmprop-types15.8.1indirect
npmreact19.2.7indirect
npmreact-colorful5.6.1indirect
npmreact-dom19.2.7indirect
npmreact-dropzone12.1.0indirect
npmreact-is16.13.1indirect
npmreact-use-measure2.1.7indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrolldown1.0.3indirect
npmscheduler0.27.0indirect
npmset-value2.0.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsplit-string3.1.0indirect
npmstats-gl2.4.2indirect
npmstats.js0.17.0indirect
npmsuspend-react0.1.3indirect
npmthree0.170.0indirect
npmthree0.184.0indirect
npmthree-mesh-bvh0.8.3indirect
npmthree-stdlib2.36.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtroika-three-text0.52.4indirect
npmtroika-three-utils0.52.4indirect
npmtroika-worker-utils0.52.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtunnel-rat0.1.2indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmuse-sync-external-store1.5.0indirect
npmutility-types3.11.0indirect
npmv8n1.5.1indirect
npmvite8.0.16indirect
npmwebgl-constants1.1.1indirect
npmwebgl-sdf-generator1.1.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:ecctrl@2.0.2 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.